Hey, JOE

[Laura A. Robinson]

Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.

Laura

[Ellie Pea]

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 03:01:20 GMT, Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

I *know* I'm gonna regret this but Laura, power down hun and go stroke your
cat, it'll do you the world of good!

[Ellie Pea]

On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 03:01:20 GMT, Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

I *know* I'm gonna regret this but Laura, power down hun and go stroke your
cat, it'll do you the world of good!

[Ellie Pea]

On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 03:31:04 GMT, Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> circa Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:15:19 +0100, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Ellie Pea ) said,
>>> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
>>> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
>>> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>>>
>>> Laura
>>
>> I *know* I'm gonna regret this but Laura, power down hun and go stroke your
>> cat, it'll do you the world of good!
>>
> I did. All better now. :-)
>
> Laura

Neat :0D

[Ellie Pea]

On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 03:31:04 GMT, Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> circa Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:15:19 +0100, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Ellie Pea ) said,
>>> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
>>> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
>>> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>>>
>>> Laura
>>
>> I *know* I'm gonna regret this but Laura, power down hun and go stroke your
>> cat, it'll do you the world of good!
>>
> I did. All better now. :-)
>
> Laura

Neat :0D

[David S.]

"Laura A. Robinson" > wrote in message
.net...

> Grow the **** up.

I've always found this expression fascinating. To me, it relates that a
**** can be planted, fertilized, watered, and grown like a plant. Once the
**** has grown, however, it obviously makes noise that is either loud or
annoying in frequency, hence the expression "shut the **** up". I have
always wanted to see a picture of the process by which a **** is grown or
quieted. I've never seen it on HG or DIY TV.

The expression "get the **** out", however, is clear and requires no further
explanation. I wouldn't at all be surprised if there are folks who are
allergic to **** plants. And what they might do to cats is beyond
comprehension.

David <------ who would "get a ****ing clue" if Home Depot sold them, but
he would defer to Ms. Laura on their relation to agriculture. :-D

[David S.]

"Laura A. Robinson" > wrote in message
.net...

> Grow the **** up.

I've always found this expression fascinating. To me, it relates that a
**** can be planted, fertilized, watered, and grown like a plant. Once the
**** has grown, however, it obviously makes noise that is either loud or
annoying in frequency, hence the expression "shut the **** up". I have
always wanted to see a picture of the process by which a **** is grown or
quieted. I've never seen it on HG or DIY TV.

The expression "get the **** out", however, is clear and requires no further
explanation. I wouldn't at all be surprised if there are folks who are
allergic to **** plants. And what they might do to cats is beyond
comprehension.

David <------ who would "get a ****ing clue" if Home Depot sold them, but
he would defer to Ms. Laura on their relation to agriculture. :-D

[Joe Canuck]

Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.

I'm not sure you think.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura A. Robinson wrote:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.

I'm not sure you think.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[David S.]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .

> I'm not sure you think.

Oh, Joe, sure she does. Not only does she think, but she relates those
thoughts in a very direct and efficient way. Let me show you:

1. > Grow the **** up.<

We know she means you, Joe, because of her use of imperative mood. The
"you" is understood, and you are mentioned by name in the subject line.

She uses "****" in the figurative rather than the literal sense. She is
bringing into question the extent of your maturity and stating that you
should increase in maturity beyond that which you have already shown in your
posts to her. She is very direct here. Two stark ideas in only four words.
There is very definitely thinking involved here.

2. >> Note that I'm removing the no archive header from this post JUST SO
THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A ****ING IDIOT. <<

There are many thoughts here, Joe.

In a prior thread you made a condescending comment on her use of the "no
archive header". You implied that she was hiding her arguments behind it
because they were weak and misinformed. She responded about why she uses
the "no archive header", and her reason did not sync up with your
evaluation. I believe that your act of condenscension precipitated the
aggravated tone you are encountering here. And the use of tone implies
thinking.

In this thread, just to make sure that you understand the depth of her
conviction that you are a ****ing idiot, she removed the "no archive
header". This means that she intends for two things to happen: a) the whole
world will know what she thinks, and b) the whole world will know it in
perpetuity. In one sentence she conveyed an aggitated tone, the size of her
audience, and the length of her audience's attention.

3. >Stupid jackass.<

In only two words she has related her opinion of your lack of intellect and
obtuse character. Efficiency doesn't get much better than this. There are
two more concepts here, Joe.

Hence, your assertion that she doesn't think is refuted by the very evidence
you are criticizing. Moreover, the tone and efficiency of her language
demonstates many products of thought.

You aren't very good at this verbal exchange thing, are you, Joe? You must
be new to this Usenet stuff.

David

[David S.]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .

> I'm not sure you think.

Oh, Joe, sure she does. Not only does she think, but she relates those
thoughts in a very direct and efficient way. Let me show you:

1. > Grow the **** up.<

We know she means you, Joe, because of her use of imperative mood. The
"you" is understood, and you are mentioned by name in the subject line.

She uses "****" in the figurative rather than the literal sense. She is
bringing into question the extent of your maturity and stating that you
should increase in maturity beyond that which you have already shown in your
posts to her. She is very direct here. Two stark ideas in only four words.
There is very definitely thinking involved here.

2. >> Note that I'm removing the no archive header from this post JUST SO
THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A ****ING IDIOT. <<

There are many thoughts here, Joe.

In a prior thread you made a condescending comment on her use of the "no
archive header". You implied that she was hiding her arguments behind it
because they were weak and misinformed. She responded about why she uses
the "no archive header", and her reason did not sync up with your
evaluation. I believe that your act of condenscension precipitated the
aggravated tone you are encountering here. And the use of tone implies
thinking.

In this thread, just to make sure that you understand the depth of her
conviction that you are a ****ing idiot, she removed the "no archive
header". This means that she intends for two things to happen: a) the whole
world will know what she thinks, and b) the whole world will know it in
perpetuity. In one sentence she conveyed an aggitated tone, the size of her
audience, and the length of her audience's attention.

3. >Stupid jackass.<

In only two words she has related her opinion of your lack of intellect and
obtuse character. Efficiency doesn't get much better than this. There are
two more concepts here, Joe.

Hence, your assertion that she doesn't think is refuted by the very evidence
you are criticizing. Moreover, the tone and efficiency of her language
demonstates many products of thought.

You aren't very good at this verbal exchange thing, are you, Joe? You must
be new to this Usenet stuff.

David

[Cheryl]

David S. wrote:
> "Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>> I'm not sure you think.
>
> Oh, Joe, sure she does. Not only does she think, but she relates
> those thoughts in a very direct and efficient way. Let me show you:
>
> 1. > Grow the **** up.<
>
> We know she means you, Joe, because of her use of imperative mood.
> The "you" is understood, and you are mentioned by name in the
subject
> line.
>

Not the same Joe. Learn to read headers. :) You're new to this
usenet stuff aren't you? lol :)

[Cheryl]

David S. wrote:
> "Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
> .. .
>
>> I'm not sure you think.
>
> Oh, Joe, sure she does. Not only does she think, but she relates
> those thoughts in a very direct and efficient way. Let me show you:
>
> 1. > Grow the **** up.<
>
> We know she means you, Joe, because of her use of imperative mood.
> The "you" is understood, and you are mentioned by name in the
subject
> line.
>

Not the same Joe. Learn to read headers. :) You're new to this
usenet stuff aren't you? lol :)

[PawsForThought]

>On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 18:02:55 GMT, "David S."
> wrote:
>
>>"Laura A. Robinson" > wrote in message
.net...
>>
>>> Grow the **** up.
>>
>>I've always found this expression fascinating. To me, it relates that a
>>**** can be planted, fertilized, watered, and grown like a plant. Once the
>>**** has grown, however, it obviously makes noise that is either loud or
>>annoying in frequency, hence the expression "shut the **** up". I have
>>always wanted to see a picture of the process by which a **** is grown or
>>quieted. I've never seen it on HG or DIY TV.
>>
>>The expression "get the **** out", however, is clear and requires no further
>>explanation. I wouldn't at all be surprised if there are folks who are
>>allergic to **** plants. And what they might do to cats is beyond
>>comprehension.
>>
>>David <------ who would "get a ****ing clue" if Home Depot sold them, but
>>he would defer to Ms. Laura on their relation to agriculture. :-D

I abso****inglutely love it!

Lauren

________
See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm

[PawsForThought]

>On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 18:02:55 GMT, "David S."
> wrote:
>
>>"Laura A. Robinson" > wrote in message
.net...
>>
>>> Grow the **** up.
>>
>>I've always found this expression fascinating. To me, it relates that a
>>**** can be planted, fertilized, watered, and grown like a plant. Once the
>>**** has grown, however, it obviously makes noise that is either loud or
>>annoying in frequency, hence the expression "shut the **** up". I have
>>always wanted to see a picture of the process by which a **** is grown or
>>quieted. I've never seen it on HG or DIY TV.
>>
>>The expression "get the **** out", however, is clear and requires no further
>>explanation. I wouldn't at all be surprised if there are folks who are
>>allergic to **** plants. And what they might do to cats is beyond
>>comprehension.
>>
>>David <------ who would "get a ****ing clue" if Home Depot sold them, but
>>he would defer to Ms. Laura on their relation to agriculture. :-D

I abso****inglutely love it!

Lauren

________
See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm

[David S.]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> Thats all well and good David... but methinks you've directed your rant
> at the wrong Joe. :-)

Oops. Oh, well. As Rosanna Rosanna Danna might say, "Never mind ...
bitch."

Sorry, Mr. Canuck.

David

[David S.]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> Thats all well and good David... but methinks you've directed your rant
> at the wrong Joe. :-)

Oops. Oh, well. As Rosanna Rosanna Danna might say, "Never mind ...
bitch."

Sorry, Mr. Canuck.

David

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Thu, 03 Jul 2003 14:14:55 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>I'm not sure you think.
>>
>
> And the point of this response is what? Proving how little you know
> of me?

Your original post:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

A favourable impression hasn't been made after having read this above.

Is that expression of hate above who you are?

Is that the impression you wish to make?

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Thu, 03 Jul 2003 14:14:55 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>I'm not sure you think.
>>
>
> And the point of this response is what? Proving how little you know
> of me?

Your original post:

> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

A favourable impression hasn't been made after having read this above.

Is that expression of hate above who you are?

Is that the impression you wish to make?

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Cathy Friedmann]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .
> Laura R. wrote:
> > circa Thu, 03 Jul 2003 14:14:55 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> > Joe Canuck ) said,
> >
> >>I'm not sure you think.
> >>
> >
> > And the point of this response is what? Proving how little you know
> > of me?
>
> Your original post:
>
> > Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> > this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> > ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
> >
> > Laura
>
> A favourable impression hasn't been made after having read this above.
>
> Is that expression of hate above who you are?
>
> Is that the impression you wish to make?

Ah... but for how long have you been reading Laura's posts?? Based on lots
of previous posts (over perhaps 2 years?), Laura definitely thinks
(objectively) & has a brain which works just fine.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon

[Cathy Friedmann]

"Joe Canuck" > wrote in message
.. .
> Laura R. wrote:
> > circa Thu, 03 Jul 2003 14:14:55 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> > Joe Canuck ) said,
> >
> >>I'm not sure you think.
> >>
> >
> > And the point of this response is what? Proving how little you know
> > of me?
>
> Your original post:
>
> > Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> > this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> > ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
> >
> > Laura
>
> A favourable impression hasn't been made after having read this above.
>
> Is that expression of hate above who you are?
>
> Is that the impression you wish to make?

Ah... but for how long have you been reading Laura's posts?? Based on lots
of previous posts (over perhaps 2 years?), Laura definitely thinks
(objectively) & has a brain which works just fine.

Cathy

--
"Staccato signals of constant information..."
("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:

> Now, quit trolling.

<insert laughing here>

Just *who* is doing the trolling? I refer you to below:

> Path: news20.bellglobal.com!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf3.bellg lobal.com!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!chi1.webusenet.com!new s.webusenet.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gn ilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> From: Laura A. Robinson >
> Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
> Subject: Hey, JOE
> Message-ID: >
> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.30
> X-Time: What I need
> Lines: 5
> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 03:01:20 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.205.216.10
> X-Complaints-To:
> X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1057114880 151.205.216.10 (Tue, 01 Jul 2003 23:01:20 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 23:01:20 EDT
> Xref: nf1.bellglobal.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:304703
>
> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

No question about it. You are.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:

> Now, quit trolling.

<insert laughing here>

Just *who* is doing the trolling? I refer you to below:

> Path: news20.bellglobal.com!nf1.bellglobal.com!nf3.bellg lobal.com!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!chi1.webusenet.com!new s.webusenet.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gn ilink.net!nwrddc01.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
> From: Laura A. Robinson >
> Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav
> Subject: Hey, JOE
> Message-ID: >
> X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.30
> X-Time: What I need
> Lines: 5
> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 03:01:20 GMT
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.205.216.10
> X-Complaints-To:
> X-Trace: nwrddc01.gnilink.net 1057114880 151.205.216.10 (Tue, 01 Jul 2003 23:01:20 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 23:01:20 EDT
> Xref: nf1.bellglobal.com rec.pets.cats.health+behav:304703
>
> Grow the **** up. Note that I'm removing the no archive header from
> this post JUST SO THE ENTIRE WORLD CAN SEE THAT I THINK YOU ARE A
> ****ING IDIOT. Stupid jackass.
>
> Laura

No question about it. You are.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:

> Hello?

I'm right here. Hello back at you.

> You didn't read "Joe's" posts, I see.

Should I? Do they contain anything important?

> As I said, **** off.

I'm not easily ****ed off. Try harder.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:

> Hello?

I'm right here. Hello back at you.

> You didn't read "Joe's" posts, I see.

Should I? Do they contain anything important?

> As I said, **** off.

I'm not easily ****ed off. Try harder.

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>
>
> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.

So is your post. So your point is?

Oh wait, I think I know what your point is: ****-off.

;-)

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>
>
> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.

So is your post. So your point is?

Oh wait, I think I know what your point is: ****-off.

;-)

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Tara]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>
>
> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.

And apparently very very delicate :-)

Tara

[Tara]

Laura R. wrote:
> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
> Joe Canuck ) said,
>
>>Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>
>
> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.

And apparently very very delicate :-)

Tara

[Joe Canuck]

Tara wrote:
> Laura R. wrote:
>
>> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
>> Joe Canuck ) said,
>>
>>> Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>>
>>
>> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.
>
>
> And apparently very very delicate :-)
>
> Tara
>

Delicate my arse... I'm savin' my arsenal for something worthy. ;-)

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck

[Joe Canuck]

Tara wrote:
> Laura R. wrote:
>
>> circa Fri, 04 Jul 2003 16:39:43 -0400, in rec.pets.cats.health+behav,
>> Joe Canuck ) said,
>>
>>> Also has a mouth that needs to be stapled or washed out with soap.
>>>
>>
>> Like I said, unsolicited and judgemental.
>
>
> And apparently very very delicate :-)
>
> Tara
>

Delicate my arse... I'm savin' my arsenal for something worthy. ;-)

--
"Its the bugs that keep it running."
-Joe Canuck