Re: Cat in a jar.

[Priscilla Ballou]

In article >,
the catlord > wrote:

> >Troll, maybe spammer, with new identity.
>
> **** YOU JOE. I posted to see whether or not people considered it
> abuse, rather than simply complain to the site since I wasn't sure
> myself. Not that someone as stupid as you would care.

I think most of us consider it a use of Photoshop.

Priscilla
--
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum,
minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
(thanks be to topfive.com)

[Seanette Blaylock]

Priscilla Ballou > had some very interesting
things to say about Re: Cat in a jar.:
>In article >,
> the catlord > wrote:
>> >Troll, maybe spammer, with new identity.
>> F*CK YOU JOE. I posted to see whether or not people considered it
>> abuse, rather than simply complain to the site since I wasn't sure
>> myself. Not that someone as stupid as you would care.
>I think most of us consider it a use of Photoshop.

Especially if one has the brains to Google the apparently about
semi-annual mentions of this particular hoax [I can think back to
hearing about this at least two *years* ago, *without* help from
Google], or to consult the Urban Legends Reference Pages [see
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/bonsai.htm for particulars on
this specific joke], or to check any of the other fairly numerous hoax
sites around *before* going into hysterics.

--
Felix, with help from his secretary/Mom