On Sun, 08 May 2005 17:52:37 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 May 2005 17:31:07 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> wrote in message ...
>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 21:03:59 GMT, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
>>>>> Animals experience disappointment Goo. Almost any
>>>>>child with a dog could tell you about it. It doesn't mean
>>>>>that all animals can, but it does mean some of them
>>>>Definitely true of parrots. Billy, my Severe Macaw makes a disappointed
>>>>vocal when he wants to come out to play and I have to walk away without him.
>>>>It's not a scream for attention; it's a quick, low vocalization of
>>>>disappointment without doubt.
>> She is quite likely to be a good and decent person
>That's lovely. She still said some bull****, though.
>>>You are projecting. It's called
>>>anthropomorphization: the projection of human
>>>characteristics onto non-human things.
>> LOL!!! For one thing Goo
>****wit, we have been through this before: YOU are
>the goober. "Goober" is an insult and slur against
>stupid ****witted southern rednecks, and YOU are the
>stupid ****witted southern redneck. YOU are the
>Goober. Don't make this mistake again.
Goo is short for Goober. Goober is short for Goobernicus.
You are Goobernicus Gonad. You "think" you are a genius
and know everthing, so you don't try to learn, so you're really
ignorant, and ignorant because you're too stupid to know it.
>> you are the LAST person who
>> could possibly have a clue about something like that
>No, ****wit. I am the one who knows about this.
You don't even know what the hell we're talking about.
>didn't even know the word "anthropomorphization" until
>I told it to you, and it's doubtful you even really
>know what it means now.
Some animals experience disappointment, and you are
too stupid to realise it. Recognition of the fact is not
anthropomorphism. This fantasy however, is:
"it were unseemly for me, who am to-day a pig, and to-morrow
but ham and sausages, to dispute with a master of ethics, yet
to my porcine intellect..."
I should have been keeping a list of your lies that I have
exposed over the years. It would be huge. Here again I'll
expose you as a liar, with this example of me pointing out
that your "AR" fantasy is an incredible example of
Subject: exposing Jonathan Ball & Dutch as "ARAs"
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:23:05 GMT
we now have
absolute proof that both Dutch and the Gonad are "ARAs" who accept
the beliefs of one of the earliest fathers of the "AR" concept, and one
of the earliest promoters of vegetarianism. That early father of "AR" was
Henry S. Salt. Here is absolute proof that they both accept Salt's beliefs
....this particular incredibly anthropomorphic example is from a fantasy that
they consider to be the position of pigs:
It would appear that you learned the term from me, and are
now trying to apply it to a situation that is not anthropomorphic.
I certainly hope no one who reads your lies is stupid enough
to believe them Goo.