test
 

PawsForThought wrote:

test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought wrote:
test

Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make
if you can or can't post?

"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
test


Hahaha! "Kittylitter.com!" Cute.

"TCS" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:
test

Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to
any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other
than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it
make
if you can or can't post?

PawsForThought often has lots of good things to say, asshole. Scrutinize
*this*

"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:
test

Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to
any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other
than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it
make
if you can or can't post?

Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?

--

But it is the Central Scwoootinizer. Be afraid. Be very afwaid. :)

PawsForThought wrote:

PawsForThought wrote:

test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.


I'm sure there are, wise ass :)


Wise, something you apparently are not.

PawsForThought wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:

test


Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post
to any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other
than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does
it make
if you can or can't post?


Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?


....something which *you* just did... reply.

"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
Joe Canuck has brought this to us :
PawsForThought wrote:

PawsForThought wrote:

test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.


I'm sure there are, wise ass :)


Wise, something you apparently are not.

**** off asshole


I was just thinking the same thing. Seems like Joe has caught what
Steve G. has.

PawsForThought wrote:

Joe Canuck has brought this to us :

PawsForThought wrote:

PawsForThought wrote:

test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.



I'm sure there are, wise ass :)


Wise, something you apparently are not.


**** off asshole


yawn

I've been called worse, surely you can do better?

laughs

PawsForThought wrote:

on 4/4/2005, Joe Canuck supposed :

PawsForThought wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:

test



Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can
post to any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say
other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference
does it make
if you can or can't post?



Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?


...something which *you* just did... reply.


Well yeah, I did start the thread, lol.


Yes, another boneheaded move.