|
|
afr wrote in message . org...
Shortly after that, during an informal chat with a woman who worked for a pet insurance company (who sent me an article in the mail), I heard that there was research indicating a strong link between bha and bht in science diet and kidney cancer in cats. My previous cat had eaten that her whole life. I had heard that Flynt River Ranch was good for cats with urinary problems, so up until his recent blockage, my present companion had been on that his whole life. There is no such research period. Like always it takes a few under educated people to jump on a band wagon they do not understand. The vast majority of such studies are done at 1% or 10,000 parts per million. Most pet foods use about 30 parts per million. Over 300 times as much as is commonly used in pets foods. Vitamin E, D, A, beta carotene, selenium and sodium would all be fatal if they were increased in doseage to the same level as was done in the majority of studies. In fact if I increased sodium levels in pet foods by one third as much, the food would be fatal. Not over the long term, but very quickly. Another way to look at this issue. Most people can take 2 aspirin without difficulty. Nobody would be stupid enough to take 600 aspirin in a single dose. Unless of course suicide was the desired result. |
I don't know now, its been long since I've been there. I do like to go in
town most of the time where I can get all my organic stuff. Its an exceptionnal case. Its a supermarket in a very small town that is close to their people and I suppose someone asked for a bag, they ordered two and never sold the other. But even so, in remote areas such as mine, rotation of these products is likely to be very slow, even when sold at the vet. I remember last year going to the vet to ask for samples of SD and they only had one flavor of canned to offer. Elaine Elaine can you give us the name of the town and the retailers name? |
I don't know now, its been long since I've been there. I do like to go in
town most of the time where I can get all my organic stuff. Its an exceptionnal case. Its a supermarket in a very small town that is close to their people and I suppose someone asked for a bag, they ordered two and never sold the other. But even so, in remote areas such as mine, rotation of these products is likely to be very slow, even when sold at the vet. I remember last year going to the vet to ask for samples of SD and they only had one flavor of canned to offer. Elaine Elaine can you give us the name of the town and the retailers name? |
From: "Jeremy Lowe"
Since the FDA asked pet food manufacturers to lower the PPM concentration of ethoxyquin http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/updates/dogethox.html there must be some concern. You're focusing on something that is about 7+ years old? Why are you looking at the glass as being 1/2 empty? There's nothing nefarious in setting standards. If it was so bad (as you suggest) why was it not banned altogether? Using your logic, perhaps it's because there wasn't enought concern for a ban? As to it's antioxidant properties there are natural sources of antioxidants that are much better sources of these desired properties. Such as....? Since food that is bought by a pet food manufacturer as prepared food does not fall under the guidelines of ingredient listing, only what the manufacturer has added how do we know that the levels of ethoxyquin are within the range listed by the FDA as acceptable. Because there is no PROOF (empirical evidence) suggesting that eq is bad for animals at levels found in pet foods. We can't, thus the best advice is simply avoid the product. You still have never addressed my argument AGAINST excess nutrients. You'd rather focus on ingredients and not focus on a REAL problem--exces nutrients in pet foods. Get a grip.... my comments simply implied I think it is better to feed as natural a food product as possible an avoid man made preservatives. And I'm saying that there is nothing wrong w/ synthetic antioxidants. Prove me wrong. Don't use scare tactics, use facts. Don't go on about Teflon, or tobacco companies, or formaldehyde, or the US Government, or anything else. Deal with facts, please. |
From: "Jeremy Lowe"
Since the FDA asked pet food manufacturers to lower the PPM concentration of ethoxyquin http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/updates/dogethox.html there must be some concern. You're focusing on something that is about 7+ years old? Why are you looking at the glass as being 1/2 empty? There's nothing nefarious in setting standards. If it was so bad (as you suggest) why was it not banned altogether? Using your logic, perhaps it's because there wasn't enought concern for a ban? As to it's antioxidant properties there are natural sources of antioxidants that are much better sources of these desired properties. Such as....? Since food that is bought by a pet food manufacturer as prepared food does not fall under the guidelines of ingredient listing, only what the manufacturer has added how do we know that the levels of ethoxyquin are within the range listed by the FDA as acceptable. Because there is no PROOF (empirical evidence) suggesting that eq is bad for animals at levels found in pet foods. We can't, thus the best advice is simply avoid the product. You still have never addressed my argument AGAINST excess nutrients. You'd rather focus on ingredients and not focus on a REAL problem--exces nutrients in pet foods. Get a grip.... my comments simply implied I think it is better to feed as natural a food product as possible an avoid man made preservatives. And I'm saying that there is nothing wrong w/ synthetic antioxidants. Prove me wrong. Don't use scare tactics, use facts. Don't go on about Teflon, or tobacco companies, or formaldehyde, or the US Government, or anything else. Deal with facts, please. |
Ralston Purina owned interest and still has connected interest in Ralcorp
which produces the Beech Nut food line, a large consumer of grain products. http://www.purina.com/company/profile/timeline.asp Since its merger with Nestle' the giant Swiss owned food company it now has more ties than ever to the human food industry. How could I forget about Nestle merging w/ Purina? ;) As for Colgate Palmolive I did not state that all major pet food manufacturers produce human food just MOST of them. This company is probably one of the few that does not hold major interest in food production, but then again I don't know that I would trust my pets health to accompany that's major product is toothpaste! Colgate owns Hill's Pet Nutrition, but Hill's Pet is it's own company. Don't you think there is some synergy between clinically proven dental diets and the expertise of Colgate in the dental category? Or is that a bad thing? |
Ralston Purina owned interest and still has connected interest in Ralcorp
which produces the Beech Nut food line, a large consumer of grain products. http://www.purina.com/company/profile/timeline.asp Since its merger with Nestle' the giant Swiss owned food company it now has more ties than ever to the human food industry. How could I forget about Nestle merging w/ Purina? ;) As for Colgate Palmolive I did not state that all major pet food manufacturers produce human food just MOST of them. This company is probably one of the few that does not hold major interest in food production, but then again I don't know that I would trust my pets health to accompany that's major product is toothpaste! Colgate owns Hill's Pet Nutrition, but Hill's Pet is it's own company. Don't you think there is some synergy between clinically proven dental diets and the expertise of Colgate in the dental category? Or is that a bad thing? |
From: (GAUBSTER2)
Ralston Purina owned interest and still has connected interest in Ralcorp which produces the Beech Nut food line, a large consumer of grain products. http://www.purina.com/company/profile/timeline.asp Since its merger with Nestle' the giant Swiss owned food company it now has more ties than ever to the human food industry. How could I forget about Nestle merging w/ Purina? ;) As for Colgate Palmolive I did not state that all major pet food manufacturers produce human food just MOST of them. This company is probably one of the few that does not hold major interest in food production, but then again I don't know that I would trust my pets health to accompany that's major product is toothpaste! Colgate owns Hill's Pet Nutrition, but Hill's Pet is it's own company. Don't you think there is some synergy between clinically proven dental diets and the expertise of Colgate in the dental category? Or is that a bad thing? Well, IMO, if they were really on the ball, they would not be advocating a dry food diet for a carnivore. Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CatBanter.com