|
|
I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but
like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey |
I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but
like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey |
Subject: Lauren the Liar--where are you?
From: "Hailey" I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey No, Hailey, she hasn't apologized. :( She started to and then rescinded it a couple of sentences later. What I meant, by "responding to me directly"....she said she had me killfiled, but then she responds to my posts anyway. shrug |
Subject: Lauren the Liar--where are you?
From: "Hailey" I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey No, Hailey, she hasn't apologized. :( She started to and then rescinded it a couple of sentences later. What I meant, by "responding to me directly"....she said she had me killfiled, but then she responds to my posts anyway. shrug |
From: "Hailey"
I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey Hi Hailey, I'm not quite sure I get the point of your post, but anyway, let me clue you in since you seem to be so interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster's troll bait. I had 2 cats who are now deceased. I loved these cats very much. On a thread about food, I posted that my cats did poorly on Hill's Science Diet. For that I have been called a liar. The fact is Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy had a fit because I dared to tell of my bad experiences with Hill's Science Diet. For some reason unknown to many (although I do have a good idea of why he does it, but that's another story), Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy is totally and completely obsessed with defending Hill's Science Diet at all costs. He has never posted anything of value but rather just flame baits people, thus his reputation as a trolll. I even went so far as to dig out the medical records from one of my deceased cats to prove to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy that they in fact did do poorly on Science Diet and once switched to another brand, their symptoms greatly improved. Instead of apologizing to me, he went on to make more nasty, rude, mean-spirited comments, and he has stopped since. Now as to you, Hailey, one has to wonder why someone is interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy. Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
From: "Hailey"
I'm sure she has you blocked so I wouldn't expect any responses at all, but like you said, there will others to put in their two cents. Same **** happened to me. Actually I wish she would block me, like she has sworn to have done so in the past. However, she has been replying directly to me, so I guess she changed her mind. That doesn't change the fact that she conjured up a pack of lies. replying directly, does that mean she apologized to you? I hope. Hailey Hi Hailey, I'm not quite sure I get the point of your post, but anyway, let me clue you in since you seem to be so interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster's troll bait. I had 2 cats who are now deceased. I loved these cats very much. On a thread about food, I posted that my cats did poorly on Hill's Science Diet. For that I have been called a liar. The fact is Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy had a fit because I dared to tell of my bad experiences with Hill's Science Diet. For some reason unknown to many (although I do have a good idea of why he does it, but that's another story), Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy is totally and completely obsessed with defending Hill's Science Diet at all costs. He has never posted anything of value but rather just flame baits people, thus his reputation as a trolll. I even went so far as to dig out the medical records from one of my deceased cats to prove to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy that they in fact did do poorly on Science Diet and once switched to another brand, their symptoms greatly improved. Instead of apologizing to me, he went on to make more nasty, rude, mean-spirited comments, and he has stopped since. Now as to you, Hailey, one has to wonder why someone is interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy. Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
Lauren, this is just more of your lies! I see you are going to try to bring in
more sympathy by dredging up this story about your dead cats. This actually has nothing to do with Science Diet. (oh, by the way, I see that you changed the title of the thread again, even though you deny ever doing this) This has to do with you LYING about me on the issue of declawing. Period. I'm still waiting for you to apologize. The TRUTH is that I sympathized with you for your cats. The TRUTH is that I mentioned to you TWICE that I believed that you may not have been happy with Science Diet. You seem to forget that all the time, because your LIES make a better "story". The TRUTH is that Phil P dug up a bunch of posts that YOU MADE that directly CONTRADICT yourself on your usage of Hill's. The TRUTH is that you have an irrational HATRED of anything Hill's. Anybody that goes back and looks at your posts will see that immediately. I simply post MY experiences and the research I'VE done on various companies and since you don't like it, you instead call names, act immature, and make up lies. When I post information DIRECTLY from Small Animal Clinical Nutrition....you pooh pooh as being fiction written by pet food companies. (which of course isn't true) If you don't like what I have to say, then ignore me. If you want to question me, fine. But just because you don't like what you see doesn't mean you should act like a spoiled 4 year brat. When myself or Steve Crane or anyone else dares defy you with a different opinion or facts that contradict you, you respond with vile name calling and more lies. That's simply the truth, lauren. You can try to besmirch me all you want. That doesn't change the fact, that you have proven yourself beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a LIAR. shrug The truth hurts, doesn't it? Hi Hailey, I'm not quite sure I get the point of your post, but anyway, let me clue you in since you seem to be so interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster's troll bait. I had 2 cats who are now deceased. I loved these cats very much. On a thread about food, I posted that my cats did poorly on Hill's Science Diet. For that I have been called a liar. The fact is Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy had a fit because I dared to tell of my bad experiences with Hill's Science Diet. For some reason unknown to many (although I do have a good idea of why he does it, but that's another story), Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy is totally and completely obsessed with defending Hill's Science Diet at all costs. He has never posted anything of value but rather just flame baits people, thus his reputation as a trolll. I even went so far as to dig out the medical records from one of my deceased cats to prove to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy that they in fact did do poorly on Science Diet and once switched to another brand, their symptoms greatly improved. Instead of apologizing to me, he went on to make more nasty, rude, mean-spirited comments, and he has stopped since. Now as to you, Hailey, one has to wonder why someone is interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy. Lauren |
Lauren, this is just more of your lies! I see you are going to try to bring in
more sympathy by dredging up this story about your dead cats. This actually has nothing to do with Science Diet. (oh, by the way, I see that you changed the title of the thread again, even though you deny ever doing this) This has to do with you LYING about me on the issue of declawing. Period. I'm still waiting for you to apologize. The TRUTH is that I sympathized with you for your cats. The TRUTH is that I mentioned to you TWICE that I believed that you may not have been happy with Science Diet. You seem to forget that all the time, because your LIES make a better "story". The TRUTH is that Phil P dug up a bunch of posts that YOU MADE that directly CONTRADICT yourself on your usage of Hill's. The TRUTH is that you have an irrational HATRED of anything Hill's. Anybody that goes back and looks at your posts will see that immediately. I simply post MY experiences and the research I'VE done on various companies and since you don't like it, you instead call names, act immature, and make up lies. When I post information DIRECTLY from Small Animal Clinical Nutrition....you pooh pooh as being fiction written by pet food companies. (which of course isn't true) If you don't like what I have to say, then ignore me. If you want to question me, fine. But just because you don't like what you see doesn't mean you should act like a spoiled 4 year brat. When myself or Steve Crane or anyone else dares defy you with a different opinion or facts that contradict you, you respond with vile name calling and more lies. That's simply the truth, lauren. You can try to besmirch me all you want. That doesn't change the fact, that you have proven yourself beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a LIAR. shrug The truth hurts, doesn't it? Hi Hailey, I'm not quite sure I get the point of your post, but anyway, let me clue you in since you seem to be so interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster's troll bait. I had 2 cats who are now deceased. I loved these cats very much. On a thread about food, I posted that my cats did poorly on Hill's Science Diet. For that I have been called a liar. The fact is Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy had a fit because I dared to tell of my bad experiences with Hill's Science Diet. For some reason unknown to many (although I do have a good idea of why he does it, but that's another story), Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy is totally and completely obsessed with defending Hill's Science Diet at all costs. He has never posted anything of value but rather just flame baits people, thus his reputation as a trolll. I even went so far as to dig out the medical records from one of my deceased cats to prove to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy that they in fact did do poorly on Science Diet and once switched to another brand, their symptoms greatly improved. Instead of apologizing to me, he went on to make more nasty, rude, mean-spirited comments, and he has stopped since. Now as to you, Hailey, one has to wonder why someone is interested in whether or not I reply to Gaubster aka Fraudster aka Troll Boy. Lauren |
From: (GAUBSTER2)
dares defy you with a different opinion or facts that contradict you, you respond with vile name calling and more lies. That's simply the truth, lauren. You can try to besmirch me all you want. lol, who started the thread "Lauren the Liar"? Obviously you still have a huge comprehension problem. The posts that Phil dug up prove nothing except my previous cats did poorly on Science Diet. You, Crane and Phil can't accept that fact, for whatever reason. If anyone owes an apology it's you. You never sympathized about my cats. Rather, you have been stalking me on this newsgroup whenever I post, calling me names. Then when I respond in kind, you cry like a baby. You just post flame bait and nothing of value. You really do need to get a life. That doesn't change the fact, that you have proven yourself beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a LIAR. No, I'm not the liar, you are by calling me a liar. Just because you want to call me a liar to suit your purposes absolutely unequivacably does not prove me a liar. It's easy for you to call me a liar, instead of accepting the fact that my cats did poorly on Science Diet. I think you're obsessed to the point of bordering on psychosis when it comes to any food thread. I'm sure everyone in this newsgroup is tired of this childish nonsense. It is a waste of bandwidth and not fair to the other members of the group, you know? But I guess you don't care about anyone else but yourself, as you've clearly proven time and time again. Replying to you is a waste because you cannot comprehend anything anyone tells you. You cannot interpret what is being said in a post. You don't seem to have the ability to absorb or grasp an opinion that isn't yours (or for that matter even ones that are). Instead you make things up about what the person is trying to say since you clearly are unable to understand any intelligent conversation. I could go on and on but I have wasted enough time already. Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CatBanter.com