On 6 Aug, 20:42, Charlie Wilkes
wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:39:49 -0400, cybercat wrote:
"Charlie Wilkes" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:52:07 +0000, Rhonda wrote:

bookie wrote:
On 3 Aug, 13:46, Lynne wrote:

on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:53:23 GMT, Charlie Wilkes

wrote:

Bookie was addressing Lynne, but Lynne supposedly has killfiled
Bookie, so I bumped the post.

Well don't bother. I have her kill-filed for a reason, and I'm not
inclined to read her blather even when quoted. -- Lynne

thats really quite pathetic and puerile of you then, typical yank
ignorance; I don't like what I hear so I am just going to out my
hands over my ears and refuse to listen especially when other peolpe
have a different opinion to me about something

Bookie,

I don't think it's the fact that you have different opinions as to why
you are killfiled, I think it's how you present your opinion. If you
come off as abrasive and judgmental and as not having any respect for
the person you are talking to -- then that's your choice, Just don't
get even more mad when people choose to stop listening.

Rhonda

Hmmm. It's true that Bookie tosses out some flame bait, with her
comments about Americans, fat people, putting a burning tire around
someone's neck, etc. etc. But so what???

I find it interesting to note the things you choose to say "so what"
about, and the things you choose to go all "old-lady-knickers-in
-a-knot" about.

???

I don't know quite what you mean by this. I think the overstated use of
killfiles is a feeble ploy, but I don't get myself worked up because
people do it. I'm just expressing an opinion. You should recall that I
have also challenged Bookie about her lurid comments re necklacing
someone with a burning tire.

In fact, I am wholly consistent in my outlook. As far as I'm concerned,
you and Bookie and Lynne are peas in a pod... truculent cat ladies with
unbounded hostility toward anyone who falls short of your cat-welfare
standards, and plenty of hostility left over to direct at one another. I
call it as I see it. It doesn't mean I'm upset, or that I don't like you.

Charlie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

openly stating that you have killfiled someone is rather sad, it is
kind of the grown up newgroup equivalent of "we don't want to play
with you, nur nur!!!" (sticks thumb on nose and waggles fingers at
someone).
and if someone wants to express themselves in a certain way ie by
verbalising the anger within them openly then thats fine by me. half
the time people say things which they wish woudl happen, eg someone
who shoots at people's cats being run out of town with a burning tyres
round their neck, but it doesn; tmean they woud actually do it, or
were some of you not aware of that? someties beign able to vent ones
spleen in such a way is a good outlet for anger and may prevent the
person actually dong somethgin harmful to themsleves or others because
they have not managed to release their pent up aggression in another
way because of what narrowminded imbeciles who like to censor
everything you write will say about it.

you can say what you like about what i write, i couldn't care less, in
fact it really amuses me that you take me so seriously that you
actually go to the extent of killfiling me for it. What also makes me
laugh is your attitude towards my statements when your country and
culture is supposed to uphold the rights of peolpe to enjoy freedom of
speech and respect what others have to say, so excuse me if I find
your attitude a little hypocritical, ladies.

bookie