bookie wrote:
On 6 Aug, 06:52, Rhonda wrote:

bookie wrote:

On 3 Aug, 13:46, Lynne wrote:

on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 06:53:23 GMT, Charlie Wilkes

wrote:

Bookie was addressing Lynne, but Lynne supposedly has killfiled Bookie,
so I bumped the post.

Well don't bother. I have her kill-filed for a reason, and I'm not
inclined to read her blather even when quoted.
--
Lynne

thats really quite pathetic and puerile of you then, typical yank
ignorance; I don't like what I hear so I am just going to out my hands
over my ears and refuse to listen especially when other peolpe have a
different opinion to me about something

Bookie,

I don't think it's the fact that you have different opinions as to why
you are killfiled, I think it's how you present your opinion. If you
come off as abrasive and judgmental and as not having any respect for
the person you are talking to -- then that's your choice, Just don't get
even more mad when people choose to stop listening.

Rhonda- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


and cybercat is not 'abrasive'? there are some people who post here
regularly who are much worse than me inthe way they present their
points of view, and I don;t killfile them i jsut see through the tone
and the way they have written their replies and go direct to the facts
or argument they are trying to make, i don't need stuff to be sugar-
coated for me to read it (in fact i don't think anyone has ever sugar
coated anything for me in my entire life, maybe that is what has made
me the way I am).

anyway, kill file me, then you lose out, simple

Bookie, the point was not to do any comparisons about who is abrasive or
not. What I was trying to say is that don't be surprised and even more
angered when you get killfiled. It seems like you really try to push
buttons and toss out insults when that happens.

Rhonda