On 6/16/2011 6:42 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:47:36 -0400, wrote:

On 6/13/2011 3:39 PM, dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:09:16 -0400, wrote:

On 6/9/2011 10:10 PM, AT DOT Gandalf wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:26:17 -0700, Rudy Canoza
wrote:

Goo would like us to believe that what's on the label is what's in the can,
because that's what he believes. Goo apparently thinks herds and flocks of
livestock animals are raised for no other reason than to be used for pet food:

"It's established: cattle and other animals are expressly raised
to be pet food." - Goo

"Cattle are specifically bred into existence to be pet
food. There have been several citations to support this." - Goo

and so believes labels saying things like the following really do represent
what's inside:

cheeseburger, turkey and bacon, lamb and rice, roasted turkey medley,
porterhouse steak, smoked bacon and egg, top sirloin, rib-eye steak, steak
florentine, oven roasted beef burgundy, steak tips sonoma, roast turkey, new
york strip, filet mignon

The poor Goober is still somewhat confused though, even though he feels certain
animals are raised only to become pet food, he's very VERY much afraid to say
what he thinks happens to the choice cuts of meat. We've narrowed it down to him
pretty much having to believe they are used in pet food and the labels on the
cans accurately represent what's inside. But why is Goo so afraid to say that's
what he believes? After considering it for a while I've come to the conclusion
that Goo's poor little brain is disturbed because it can't figure out why
rib-eye for dogs is so much cheaper than it is for humans, and he also can't
figure out why a can of rib-eye dog food isn't several times more expensive than
a can of cheeseburger dog food, etc. LOL!!!
Another GOD DAMNED Usenet TROLL.

Please DO NOT FEED THIS CROSS POSTING TROLL!!!!
You can start by not cross posting it. Duh!
There's nothing wrong with cross posting.
There is something wrong with cross posting troll posts.
You don't appreciate the significance. Some eliminationists like to believe
that animals live and die ONLY to become pet food, meaning that more animals
experience life because of it which is incorrect. Even so they believe it and so
they are opposed to it.

There is no commercial pet food company anywhere that does that. Dog
food is almost always made from leftovers from human foods, and that
will sometimes include sawdust, roadkill, pea hulls, beet pulp, and worse!

However, even if it were true why would anyone oppose it?

Goo believed that some cattle are raised for twelve
years for no other reason than to become pet food. If there are any other people
that clueless, they should learn the truth already.

Animals used for food are used very young when they are tender. How
could it be cost efficient to feed an animal for 12 years before you
butcher it? Your average chicken in a supermarket is only 8-10 weeks old.

Having said all that, all you and your friends are doing is repeating
the same crap over and over again and not adding anything new to the
debate so why do it?