I couldn't agree more, Phil. Society likes to come up with words to hide
what they don't want to think about.

....like "pro choice" instead of "killing".






"Phil P." wrote in message
...

"Joe Pitt" wrote in message
. ..
I attended a presentation about stopping the killing of cats (and dogs)
in
animal control facilities. He emphasised that you euthanize an animal
that
is SICK. What is happening in shelters all over is they are KILLING
perfectly fine animals because they are unwanted, often due to the
failure
to spay and neuter their parents. The general public sees 'euthanized'
and
it softens what is happening in their minds.

I see postings that say you adopted the day before the animal was due to
be
euthanized. Tell people you adopted just before the animal was due to be
KILLED.

It may seem a small thing, but when you talk to people it may help their
awareness of the problem.

Maybe if everyone used the correct terms that describes exactly what it
is,
more people would be outraged and sickened enough to force legislation to
eliminate it -- like mandatory neuter before adoption or sale (health
permiting) and subsidize vets or give them a tax deduction for neutering
all
animals in their care regardless of the owners' consent or ability to pay.

I use the terms "excecute", "put to death", "slaughter"... because they
stick in peoples' throats and are much harder to swallow than "put to
sleep"
or euthanize" or "put down".