On 13 May 2005 09:58:06 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote:

dh@. wrote:
On 12 May 2005 10:18:32 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"
wrote:

dh@. wrote:
On 9 May 2005 10:58:09 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"
wrote:

He is incapable of seeing the real flaw in their argument

What is then Goo?

Your question doesn't make any sense.

That's because you don't believe there is any "real flaw in their
argument".

"What is then" was an absurd question, ****wit.

There are several serious flaws,

There sure are, and you don't have a clue about any of them.

and I have correctly identified them.
You have not. You have come up with a goofy idea because you feel the
need to justify that you kill animals.