"Meghan Noecker" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:00:10 -0500, "Phil P."
wrote:


Maybe if everyone used the correct terms that describes exactly what it
is,
more people would be outraged and sickened enough to force legislation to
eliminate it -- like mandatory neuter before adoption or sale (health
permitting) and subsidize vets or give them a tax deduction for neutering
all
animals in their care regardless of the owners' consent or ability to
pay.

It would be great to get help with vet costs for altering pets, but no
vet would ever go along with mandatory altering without owners'
consent.

If mandatory neutering was the law, vets would have no choice.... (health
permitting).

If they altered a champion dog that was part of a breeding
program, there would be a major lawsuit.


Vets would be protected by the law.... Btw, breeders are not very high on my
list of priorities.... In fact, they're not even on it....

Phil