On 15 Jun, 23:16, goyangi tan wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:52 pm, sheelagh wrote:

The least desirable comment, freely offered opinion that I could find,
was this:

I broke bad! yes I did.
I grabbed Lucy by the nap of the neck and showed her what ugly was
My point is, it's never the cats fault, cats will take as much

Really? Not surprising, given your short relationship with the written
word.

How about these:

"I grabbed Lucy by the nap of the neck and showed her what ugly was"

"If Lucy swipes a kitten, I hound her down with a broom
and muther****ing dare her to do it again... im the big cat around
here, I call the shots, Im in charge"

Did you intentionally omit these in deference to your *virtual*
friend, or did you not understand the words?
Here -- print this out and have someone read it aloud to you:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.p...av/msg/79a6cbb...

All I could read here, was a man who had a bad hair day here, & he was
direct enough & honest about how he felt.. He was annoyed @ the time,
& was venting.
I think we all have moments like that.( Maybe you don't?)....

Suuure. He didn't *mean* to terrorise his pets with a broom and rough
handling...'and it'll never happen again I promise honest baby'.
Drunken wife beaters use that as a defence all the time.

If you would care to inspect the passage again., I think you will find
that he might have felt that way, but that doesn't prove a case for
very unsavoury innuendo's, & deformation of character. He didn't say
he hurt them, merely an opinion as to why he felt that way. Can you?

"Deformation"?! Like John Merrick?
ROTFLMAO
Give us another, Mrs. Malaprop.

I don't see any threat involved here.

I'm quite sure you don't -- or don't *want* to. He's your Usenet
master, after all...

This is not abuse. He didn't say he hurt them either.

No. Of course not. I'm sure that Lucy purred with joy at being grabbed
"by the nap (sic) of the neck and
shown what ugly was" and "hound(ed) down with a broom and
muther****ing (sic) dared to do it again".
I'm sure loving cat owners grab their adult cats by the neck all the
time -- and have the deep scars to prove it.

Touchingly oblivious, as always. Obarry Wan has trained you well.

BTW, does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Oh, Believe me it has "Nothing to do with being trained"'far from it
in fact..
I would have said exactly the same thing about the vast majority of
the posters on this site. I believe they were careless words & would
be disappointed to hear otherwise, but until then I am prepared to
give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled to it


It has nothing to do with knowing Barry.
Barry is no master of mine @ all, & if you knew any better you
wouldn't be saying this.
As you so kindly point out, he used unwise words. However, I don't
think he said anything about abusing them. It is what you assume that
is the figment of your deluded imagination that motivates this hate
campaign. If you really want to know what I think, it is this:
I have no idea what motivates you towards Him & see no sport in trying
to character assassination.
You do the same to me & others here too. We just get fed up with
hearing the same old thing.
I would remind you..it is you that seems to follow the group, not the
other way around. You are the classic unoriginal troll, totally
unadulterated " Look @ MEeeeee"
-----------------------------
I designed this as a motivating subject & left it open to debate as to
whether the new laws that cover cats welfare, is it doing the job it
was designed to do..or do others feel that it is too little too late?

*I really can't be bothered to trade insults with you. I would rather
abandon the Post than do any talking with you. It is the ONLY way to
deal with a twisted mind of someone who's only "thrill is to try &
provoke a reaction. No, I know better.. I don't want to know! & I
would "RATHER" ABANDOD this post than trade anything with you. It
would make me as bad as you. Just so you understood.*
---------------------------------