If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shame on the CBC
From a December issue of Marketing Magazine:
The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-03-22, Kim penned:
From a December issue of Marketing Magazine: The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. Hrm. There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message
... On 2005-03-22, Kim penned: From a December issue of Marketing Magazine: The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. Hrm. There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca The chances are very good that the scene, or at least part of it, is computer generated, and the fish is not really suffocating. Joy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoj" wrote in message . .. "Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... On 2005-03-22, Kim penned: From a December issue of Marketing Magazine: The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. Hrm. There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca The chances are very good that the scene, or at least part of it, is computer generated, and the fish is not really suffocating. Joy While that may be true, I was a child with asthma. It is a horrible, helpless feeling to be a small child and have an asthma attack so severe you can't even go get your parents or call out to ask for help. No child with asthma needs to see an add like that on TV regardless of what point it might be trying to make. Jo |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I saw that ad once and it bothered me a lot. I was
thinking, "How far are they gonna go with this?" "Jo Firey" wrote in message ... "Yoj" wrote in message . .. "Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... On 2005-03-22, Kim penned: From a December issue of Marketing Magazine: The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. Hrm. There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca The chances are very good that the scene, or at least part of it, is computer generated, and the fish is not really suffocating. Joy While that may be true, I was a child with asthma. It is a horrible, helpless feeling to be a small child and have an asthma attack so severe you can't even go get your parents or call out to ask for help. No child with asthma needs to see an add like that on TV regardless of what point it might be trying to make. Jo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[[There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It
depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. ]] I saw that ad, too. It makes me think, "Please tell me they're not actually doing this to a real fish. The SPCA would be after them if they hurt an animal while making the commercial... right?" I hope Joy's observation, that at least some of the scene is computer-generated, is true. I understand that it's an important point they're trying to make, but even so, I would hate to think that they'd be able to cause suffering to any sort of animal in the process of making it. Donna |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Jo Firey" wrote in message
... "Yoj" wrote in message . .. "Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... On 2005-03-22, Kim penned: From a December issue of Marketing Magazine: The Nova Scotia SPCA had the CBC howling against the shock value of ads created for the animal rights group by Hallifax's Porkpie Hat. Designed to raise awareness about responsible pet ownership, the CBC refused to air spots in which children asked questions like "If I make a mistake, will you give me away?" A voiceover asks "If this is so wrong, what makes it OK when it's a pet?" That's advertising that cuts through. Hrm. There's an ad on TV around here sometimes about childhood asthma. It depicts a goldfish whose water supply is continually dwindling, until the fish is on its side, panting, and a child's voice says, "I don't want to feel like a fish without water." The ad disturbs me. Did they really have to resort to suffocating a fish to get the message across? It seems even more wrong because they want us to identify with the fish's suffering, so clearly they know they're hurting it. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca The chances are very good that the scene, or at least part of it, is computer generated, and the fish is not really suffocating. Joy While that may be true, I was a child with asthma. It is a horrible, helpless feeling to be a small child and have an asthma attack so severe you can't even go get your parents or call out to ask for help. No child with asthma needs to see an add like that on TV regardless of what point it might be trying to make. Jo That is a good point. I didn't develop asthma until I was an adult, but I can certainly see what you mean. Joy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Megan - Declaw Hall of Shame? | PawsForThought | Cat health & behaviour | 12 | July 6th 04 01:07 PM |
Shame, shame AOL... | -L. : | Cat health & behaviour | 4 | March 25th 04 03:02 PM |
FLORIDA: STATE OF SHAME - VERY LONG | Hopitus2 | Cat anecdotes | 2 | November 15th 03 04:47 AM |