If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
rec.pets.cats.breeds
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 21:38:56 -0700, Matthew Montchalin
wrote: On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 wrote: |The rescue people don't realize how much purebred cat owners and |reputable breeders HATE the backyard breeders. Hm. Do reputable breeders actually take their cats' offspring to veterinarians for DNA testing? I'd think their reputations actually depend on more than just a wink and a handshake, but on independently verifiable credentials. I am not a breeder. I have not yet heard of DNA testing. Maine Coon breeders carefully check their studs and queens for cardio and hip problems. The whole idea is to try to eliminate genetic defects that are common to the breed. I am totally ignorant of how " new " breeds are created. |The problem is with a certain " militant " type of rescue worker |who can't deal with the idea that some people ONLY want a certain |type of purebred. I wish I had my purebred albino tabby back... It's a long story... |They take the position that every home given to a purebred is one |less home for a moggie. In their eyes , you are a " cat killer. " | |I suspect that is the main reason for the proposal of |rec.pets.cats.breeds. |The real question: Are there enough owners and breeders to support |the group NOW? Over the years many people have left newsgroups |because of the hostility encountered over this issue. Will they |come back? I guess we will find out if and when there is a vote |for rec.pets.cats.breeds It will produce an interesting result. I was thinking of abstaining until Arthur said he'd probably vote yes, so I am tempted to vote yes, too. I still am uncertain how these organizations maintain their registries, though. Are they judging these cats on their genetic makeup, or on whether they are winners of cat shows? Genetic makeup, as I understand it. Once a breed has been accepted into one of the organizations , it must conform to certain standards. Breeders take the cats that they think will win to the shows. ALL purebred cats are in the registry. There is little difference in looks and no difference in temperament between " show " cats , breeder cats, and pet quality cats. Unless a buyer is planning on breeding or showing , all the cats that are sold are pet quality. Very few people want to get involved in breeding or showing. It is an expensive and time consuming endeavor. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew Montchalin wrote:
If an owner can show that her cat shares the relevant DNA, she could compel the organization to have her cat recorded? Assuming the fee is paid? Unlikely. The registry includes lineage, so an inexpensive test would not be adequate to match Tom and Queen's DNA. A full DNA analysis showing and EXACTLY 50% match might be reasonable evidence of descent*, but.... And would this question be appropriate for rcp.breeds? -- This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack. I think I've got the problem resolved, but, if you E-mail me and it bounces, a second try might work. However, please reply in newsgroup. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew Montchalin wrote:
If an owner can show that her cat shares the relevant DNA, she could compel the organization to have her cat recorded? Assuming the fee is paid? Unlikely. The registry includes lineage, so an inexpensive test would not be adequate to match Tom and Queen's DNA. A full DNA analysis showing and EXACTLY 50% match might be reasonable evidence of descent*, but.... And would this question be appropriate for rcp.breeds? -- This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack. I think I've got the problem resolved, but, if you E-mail me and it bounces, a second try might work. However, please reply in newsgroup. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Matthew Montchalin wrote:
If an owner can show that her cat shares the relevant DNA, she could compel the organization to have her cat recorded? Assuming the fee is paid? Unlikely. The registry includes lineage, so an inexpensive test would not be adequate to match Tom and Queen's DNA. A full DNA analysis showing and EXACTLY 50% match might be reasonable evidence of descent*, but.... And would this question be appropriate for rcp.breeds? -- This account is subject to a persistent MS Blaster and SWEN attack. I think I've got the problem resolved, but, if you E-mail me and it bounces, a second try might work. However, please reply in newsgroup. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.pets.cats.breeds | Noreen Cooper | Cat health & behaviour | 29 | September 9th 03 06:36 PM |
RFD: rec.pets.cats.breeds | BarB | Cat anecdotes | 1 | September 7th 03 09:18 PM |