If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought"
wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought wrote: test Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any unmoderated newsgroup. If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than "test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make if you can or can't post? Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for you, eh? Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it does, then great, Problem solved. -- Meghan & the Zoo Crew Equine and Pet Photography http://www.zoocrewphoto.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
equalizer wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck wrote: PawsForThought wrote: test There *are* test groups for this purpose. If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND** time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine? eq Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the whole episode than I am. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
PawsForThought wrote:
Joe Canuck brought next idea : PawsForThought wrote: on 4/4/2005, Joe Canuck supposed : PawsForThought wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought wrote: test Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any unmoderated newsgroup. If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than "test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make if you can or can't post? Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for you, eh? ...something which *you* just did... reply. Well yeah, I did start the thread, lol. Yes, another boneheaded move. Yep, you are a bonehead! :-) ....and your point would be? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
equalizer wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:50:52 -0400, Joe Canuck wrote: equalizer wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck wrote: PawsForThought wrote: test There *are* test groups for this purpose. If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND** time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine? eq Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the whole episode than I am. Nope, not offended. Just enjoying making you continue to post in a thread you found "objectionable". My aim is to keep this thread going as long as possible now for the pure entertainment value and to make you look like a hypocrite. Now, dance! eq Well, you apparently have less of a clue about Usenet that you think you do. Go chew on that for a while, see if you can connect the dots. Report back here when finished. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
PawsForThought wrote:
Meghan Noecker used his keyboard to write : On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought" wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought wrote: test Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any unmoderated newsgroup. If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than "test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make if you can or can't post? Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for you, eh? Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it does, then great, Problem solved. I actually did do a test post at 1.test, which posted fine. But for some reason I was having problems posting to this particular group. Unfortunately my employer decided to come in at that moment with something for me to do so I just did a quick test post. Yeah, I suppose I should have thought of some great topic, but I didn't. So sue me :/ Playing on Usenet while on the job, great set of work ethics you have. No surprise there. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
u r all acting like trolls
grow up "PawsForThought" wrote in message ... equalizer wrote : On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:50:52 -0400, Joe Canuck wrote: equalizer wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck wrote: PawsForThought wrote: test There *are* test groups for this purpose. If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND** time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine? eq Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the whole episode than I am. Nope, not offended. Just enjoying making you continue to post in a thread you found "objectionable". My aim is to keep this thread going as long as possible now for the pure entertainment value and to make you look like a hypocrite. Now, dance! eq LMAO!!!! Poor wittle Joe :') -- PawsForThought |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"FatBobRoundPants" wrote in message ... u r all acting like trolls grow up U done sA? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Joe Canuck" wrote in message ... PawsForThought wrote: Meghan Noecker used his keyboard to write : On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought" wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought wrote: test Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any unmoderated newsgroup. If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than "test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make if you can or can't post? Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for you, eh? Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it does, then great, Problem solved. I actually did do a test post at 1.test, which posted fine. But for some reason I was having problems posting to this particular group. Unfortunately my employer decided to come in at that moment with something for me to do so I just did a quick test post. Yeah, I suppose I should have thought of some great topic, but I didn't. So sue me :/ Playing on Usenet while on the job, great set of work ethics you have. No surprise there. Have you always been this much of an asshole, and if so, how did I miss it? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"kaeli" wrote in message ... In article , enlightened us with... u r all acting like trolls grow up hook3d on fonics wurked 4 me / so sorry hahaha! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Otis urine test results back | Susan M | Cat anecdotes | 11 | March 31st 05 09:57 PM |
Boop test | Gabey8 | Cat anecdotes | 8 | February 24th 05 03:06 AM |
Test message, please discard | [email protected] | Cat community | 0 | October 26th 04 03:01 PM |
Feline leukemia -- how young to test? | Priscilla H Ballou | Cat health & behaviour | 14 | September 12th 04 04:40 AM |
Shamrock FeLV test | Jean Hobbs | Cat anecdotes | 5 | August 15th 04 04:06 PM |