If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
... bewtifulfreak wrote in There are regional and cultural issues surrounding everything we do and one country will be in line with it while another will not. Glom on to whatever fits within your ideal, but don't discount everything that does not as "just wrong." Because by and large it isn't. It's just an opinion. As I said, there is anecdotal evidence and professional information indicating that it's not just opinion that declawing can and often does harm cats: it's fact. That's not hystrionic and overzelous, that's just plain fact. I support you in living your life in whatever way you see fit that doesn't harm another being: I don't care about your religious preference, your sexual preference, what you wear, what you eat, if you smoke (as long as you do so considerately), or anything else. I don't care if you belive in God or whether the moon is made of green cheese. *That's* all a matter of opinion and personal preference, or, in the case of believing the moon is made of green cheese, harmless ignorance. Causing injury to another being - particularly for your own convenience, but for any reason whatsoever - is certainly *not* harmless, and thus, not merely a matter of personal preference, unless you are the type of person who believes that someone should be allowed to exercise their preference for things such as wife beating. How many industrialized nations are there in the world anyway? Twenty of them have banned declawing. Twenty different nations agreeing on the same thing seems like far more than "opinion" to me, and certainly argues against it being a matter of regional and cultural preference, unless we are to believe all twenty of those nations have the same regional and cultural bias, which seems highly unlikely. The only two countries that haven't banned it are much more likely to share a cultural and regional bias, that most likely being the bias of putting the love of money above all else. Half of them admit there's still an underground for it and the results have been similar to the banning of abortion--disfigurement and death. If that's what you want to happen to cats, fine. I think you're cruel. I don't want that to happen. I don't want murder to happen either, but it does. But does that mean we should make it legal? I'm not comparing declawing to murder, but the fact that something happens illegally doesn't justify making it legal. And for someone who encourages people to discuss things rationally in order to make their opinions more accesible, accusing me of wanting cats to suffer and calling me cruel because I'm against declawing is not only irrational, but hypocritical as well. Ann -- For more information on the anti-declawing issue I would recommend The Declawing Information Site: http://stopdeclaw.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Declawing: glad I took the time | [email protected] | Cat health & behaviour | 247 | November 10th 03 04:12 PM |
Unbelievable BS! WRT declawing from the SFVMA | [email protected] | Cat health & behaviour | 6 | September 29th 03 04:04 PM |