If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:19:36 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:
dh@. wrote in message news On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:02:10 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: dh@. wrote On Sun, 8 May 2005 18:13:34 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: Quit pretending that you "consider the animals" in some unselfish way, it's obvious that you don't. Do you? If so, explain how I'm not the one claiming I do. Good, because you "ARAs" certainly should never claim to care about the animals that you want to eliminate. People who eat meat should never claim to be doing those animals a favour. QUIT PRETENDING THAT YOU *CONSIDER* ANIMALS IN SOME UNSELFISH WAY. I can. You can't. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
dh@. wrote:
On 13 May 2005 10:03:59 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On 12 May 2005 10:19:48 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. That's a lie. No, ****wit. It isn't a lie. Your belief that they can experience disappointment is purely your anthropomorphic projection. There is no credible evidence non-human animals can experience disappointment. All we have are unreliable anecdotes from credulous dopes like you. You're too stupid for this Goo. ****wit: YOU are the Goober. Stop repeating this fundamental error. There is one Goober, and you are it. I am both smarter and more intelligent than you, ****wit - you know it, I know it, everyone who has ever read these exchanges knows it. It isn't even close. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
dh@. wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005 09:19:36 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: dh@. wrote in message news On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:02:10 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: dh@. wrote On Sun, 8 May 2005 18:13:34 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: Quit pretending that you "consider the animals" in some unselfish way, it's obvious that you don't. Do you? If so, explain how I'm not the one claiming I do. Good, because you "ARAs" certainly should never claim to care about the animals that you want to eliminate. People who eat meat should never claim to be doing those animals a favour. QUIT PRETENDING THAT YOU *CONSIDER* ANIMALS IN SOME UNSELFISH WAY. I can. You do not. Stop lying about it. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Rudy Canoza wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. Period. You've got to be kidding me!! Seriously, I am very disappointed that this discussion is even happening! WTF! Let's start with definition: dis=B7ap=B7point 1. To fail to satisfy the hope, desire, or expectation of. Rudy, are you saying animals have no hopes or desires? Or are you saying their hopes and desires are always satisfied? Here's another one for you, have you ever admitted to an error? You should try it every day, it makes you a better person. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:10:05 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
dh@. wrote: On 13 May 2005 10:03:59 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On 12 May 2005 10:19:48 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. That's a lie. No, ****wit. It isn't a lie. Your belief that they can experience disappointment is purely your anthropomorphic projection. There is no credible evidence non-human animals can experience disappointment. All we have are unreliable anecdotes from credulous dopes like you. You're too stupid for this Goo. ****wit: YOU are the Goober. Stop repeating this fundamental error. There is one Goober, and you are it. I am both smarter and more intelligent than you, You are Goobernicus Gonad. You are a moron. You are an "ARA". ****wit - you know it, I know it, everyone who has ever read these exchanges knows it. LOL! Even if every single person on the planet read your stupid lies and believed them, it would only prove that they're stupid enough to believe your lies Goober. Maybe they are, but that wouldn't mean you're smart, it would only mean that they're stupid. It isn't even close. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 17:10:05 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: dh@. wrote: On 13 May 2005 10:03:59 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On 12 May 2005 10:19:48 -0700, "Rudy Canoza" wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. That's a lie. No, ****wit. It isn't a lie. Your belief that they can experience disappointment is purely your anthropomorphic projection. There is no credible evidence non-human animals can experience disappointment. All we have are unreliable anecdotes from credulous dopes like you. You're too stupid for this Goo. ****wit: YOU are the Goober. Stop repeating this fundamental error. There is one Goober, and you are it. I am both smarter and more intelligent than you, You are Goobernicus Gonad. You are a ****witted, stupid-beyond-belief 46-YEAR-OLD pseudo-"man" who still makes up silly sounding names. You are a punk, ****wit. You are not a real man. You didn't address the statement, ****wit. You are stupid, and I am not. ****wit - you know it, I know it, everyone who has ever read these exchanges knows it. LOL! You think it's funny that everyone correctly regards you as stupid? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 May 2005 23:34:05 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote:
wrote: Rudy Canoza wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. Period. You've got to be kidding me!! Seriously, I am very disappointed that this discussion is even happening! WTF! Let's start with definition: dis·ap·point 1. To fail to satisfy the hope, desire, or expectation of. You IDIOT! That's what someone can do TO another. It is an ACTIVE verb: you disappoint me. TO BE disappointed is passive. The disappointed one doesn't DO anything. You've given an active verb to try to support an overly sentimental, anthropomorphizing view that animals can PASSIVELY be disappointed. You ****ing moron. For starters, animals do not have "hopes". They have primitive desires and expectations, They are all related and some animals experience them. Most people are not too stupid to understand that Goober. but they are not "disappointed" when they are not satisfied. Rudy, are you saying animals have no hopes or desires? They absolutely do not have hopes. You are too stupid to understand. They have primitive desires, and when the desires aren't met, the animals do not mope the way humans might. How the hell could you know? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
dh@. wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 23:34:05 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: wrote: Rudy Canoza wrote: dh@. wrote: On Sun, 08 May 2005 20:41:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: we have been here to establish that your beliefs about animals are purely your projection of your emotions onto animals. That is called anthropomorphization, and it is philosophically wrong. We have also been here and found that you have no idea whether my beliefs are correct or not, We DO know that your beliefs are completely incorrect. because you don't have a clue which emotions they are and are not capable of. We do know certain ones that they do not experience. Disappointment is one they do not experience. Period. You've got to be kidding me!! Seriously, I am very disappointed that this discussion is even happening! WTF! Let's start with definition: dis·ap·point 1. To fail to satisfy the hope, desire, or expectation of. You IDIOT! That's what someone can do TO another. It is an ACTIVE verb: you disappoint me. TO BE disappointed is passive. The disappointed one doesn't DO anything. You've given an active verb to try to support an overly sentimental, anthropomorphizing view that animals can PASSIVELY be disappointed. You ****ing moron. For starters, animals do not have "hopes". They have primitive desires and expectations, They are all related They are not. You're too stupid and UNEDUCATED to know. but they are not "disappointed" when they are not satisfied. Rudy, are you saying animals have no hopes or desires? They absolutely do not have hopes. You are too stupid to understand. You are the stupid uneducated dope in all this, Goober****wit. I am smart; more to the point, I am vastly smarter and better educated and more thoughtful than you. They have primitive desires, and when the desires aren't met, the animals do not mope the way humans might. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Distressing Article | Phil P. | Cat health & behaviour | 2 | December 15th 04 12:51 AM |
Animals are not currency | Michael | Cat anecdotes | 18 | September 14th 04 01:20 PM |
Friend in Oshkosh Wisconsin needs help! | Batson | Cat health & behaviour | 10 | May 26th 04 08:47 PM |
NEW PET ANIMALS BULLETIN BOARD SERVICE! | Animalsrus1 | Cat rescue | 1 | August 1st 03 12:19 AM |