test

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought"
wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:
test

Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can post to any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference does it make
if you can or can't post?

Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?

Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe
I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to
somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it
does, then great, Problem solved.


--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com

equalizer wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck
wrote:


PawsForThought wrote:


test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.



If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of
the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND**
time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in
hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine?

eq

Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the
whole episode than I am.

PawsForThought wrote:

Joe Canuck brought next idea :

PawsForThought wrote:

on 4/4/2005, Joe Canuck supposed :

PawsForThought wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:

test




Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can
post to any
unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say
other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference
does it make
if you can or can't post?




Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty
for you, eh?


...something which *you* just did... reply.



Well yeah, I did start the thread, lol.


Yes, another boneheaded move.


Yep, you are a bonehead! :-)



....and your point would be?

equalizer wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:50:52 -0400, Joe Canuck
wrote:


equalizer wrote:


On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck
wrote:



PawsForThought wrote:



test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.



If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of
the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND**
time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in
hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine?

eq

Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the
whole episode than I am.



Nope, not offended. Just enjoying making you continue to post in a
thread you found "objectionable". My aim is to keep this thread going as
long as possible now for the pure entertainment value and to make you
look like a hypocrite.

Now, dance!

eq


Well, you apparently have less of a clue about Usenet that you think you
do. Go chew on that for a while, see if you can connect the dots.

Report back here when finished.

PawsForThought wrote:
Meghan Noecker used his keyboard to write :

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought"
wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:

test


Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can
post to any unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say
other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference
does it make if you can or can't post?


Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?


Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe
I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to
somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it
does, then great, Problem solved.


I actually did do a test post at 1.test, which posted fine. But for
some reason I was having problems posting to this particular group.
Unfortunately my employer decided to come in at that moment with
something for me to do so I just did a quick test post. Yeah, I suppose
I should have thought of some great topic, but I didn't. So sue me :/


Playing on Usenet while on the job, great set of work ethics you have.

No surprise there.

u r all acting like trolls
grow up

"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
equalizer wrote :
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:50:52 -0400, Joe Canuck
wrote:

equalizer wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:38:25 -0400, Joe Canuck
wrote:


PawsForThought wrote:


test


There *are* test groups for this purpose.



If you were so "offended" by this, then WTF did you quote the text of
the entire frigging thing, effectively propagating it a **SECOND**
time?!? Don't you have more productive things to do, like posting in
hood boy style on rec.skiing.alpine?

eq

Judging by your rhetoric, it seems you are much more offended over the
whole episode than I am.


Nope, not offended. Just enjoying making you continue to post in a
thread you found "objectionable". My aim is to keep this thread going as
long as possible now for the pure entertainment value and to make you
look like a hypocrite.

Now, dance!

eq

LMAO!!!! Poor wittle Joe :')

--
PawsForThought

"FatBobRoundPants" wrote in message
...
u r all acting like trolls
grow up



U done sA?

"Joe Canuck" wrote in message
...
PawsForThought wrote:
Meghan Noecker used his keyboard to write :

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:50:37 -0400, "PawsForThought"
wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:48:22 -0400, PawsForThought
wrote:

test


Take it to a test newsgroup; if you can post there then you can
post to any unmoderated newsgroup.

If you can't fathom that, then how about having something to say
other than
"test". If you never have anything to say, then what difference
does it make if you can or can't post?


Why would anyone reply to a test post? Life must be pretty empty for
you, eh?


Because if everybody did test posts, the groups would be horrible. Whe
I need to do a test, I just come up with a new topic or reply to
somebody. If it doesn't post, I can always repost it later. And if it
does, then great, Problem solved.


I actually did do a test post at 1.test, which posted fine. But for
some reason I was having problems posting to this particular group.
Unfortunately my employer decided to come in at that moment with
something for me to do so I just did a quick test post. Yeah, I suppose
I should have thought of some great topic, but I didn't. So sue me :/


Playing on Usenet while on the job, great set of work ethics you have.

No surprise there.


Have you always been this much of an asshole, and if so,
how did I miss it?

In article ,
enlightened us with...
u r all acting like trolls
grow up


hook3d on fonics wurked 4 me

/ so sorry

--
--
~kaeli~
A bicycle can't stand on its own because it is two tired.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

"kaeli" wrote in message
...
In article ,
enlightened us with...
u r all acting like trolls
grow up


hook3d on fonics wurked 4 me

/ so sorry



hahaha!