Scottie's vet called

"Phil P." wrote in message
news:sKlRf.22820$_f4.3882@trnddc03...

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...


I agree with you Charlie. That's paranoia and too much TV.


Ain't that a hoot! You went on Court TV to try to sue a boyfriend for
breaking up with you- and lost. If this happened to your cat, you'd be
screaming SUE SUE SUE all over the internet. You'd milk the tragedy for
every drop of attention for yourself that you could ring out it.


Remember the judge even laughed at her along with the audience

Matthew AKA NMR ( NO MORE RETAIL ) 10 points a troll
@linethetrollsup.com wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:


"Phil P." wrote in message
news:sKlRf.22820$_f4.3882@trnddc03...

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in
message ...


I agree with you Charlie. That's paranoia and too much TV.


Ain't that a hoot! You went on Court TV to try to sue a
boyfriend for breaking up with you- and lost. If this happened
to your cat, you'd be screaming SUE SUE SUE all over the
internet. You'd milk the tragedy for every drop of attention for
yourself that you could ring out it.


Remember the judge even laughed at her along with the audience




Yeah right. You've seen it. Is that what you're lying about this
time? I sue my boyfriend for unpaid royalties and I won. The rest was
undue hardship for the money not being paid, which was not awarded.

--
Brandy Alexandre

-- Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

Brandy Alexandre wrote:
BTW, why are you always so willing to let Phil make a fool out of
you leading you down these garden paths? You've become part of his
psychosis.

http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm

Oh yes, Karleen, you're such a victim!!!

Don't flatter yourself.

-L.

Here we go again

ROFTLMAO stop it please you are making me laugh so hard you. Oh god call
911 my side are splitting
at least you are good for something thank you for the laugh


I thought you plonked me I suggest you do so if you don't like what I have
to say.

You don't have worry about me being a stalker of you. For that to happen
you would actual have to matter to and in my world and definitely not sorry
to say you will never have that stasis of being in it.



What was it Phil that judge said on the peoples court what was that link so
she can remember what the judge said



"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...
Matthew AKA NMR ( NO MORE RETAIL ) 10 points a troll
@linethetrollsup.com wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:


"Phil P." wrote in message
news:sKlRf.22820$_f4.3882@trnddc03...

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in
message ...


I agree with you Charlie. That's paranoia and too much TV.


Ain't that a hoot! You went on Court TV to try to sue a
boyfriend for breaking up with you- and lost. If this happened
to your cat, you'd be screaming SUE SUE SUE all over the
internet. You'd milk the tragedy for every drop of attention for
yourself that you could ring out it.


Remember the judge even laughed at her along with the audience


BTW, why are you always so willing to let Phil make a fool out of
you leading you down these garden paths? You've become part of his
psychosis.

http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm


Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person"


Types of stalkers


The Resentful:


* The goal of this stalker is to frighten and distress the victim.


* These stalkers may also experience feelings of injustice and
desire revenge.


The Predatory:


* The power and control that comes from stalking a victim gives
these stalkers a great deal of enjoyment.


* The stalker often strives to learn more about the victim.


* The stalker may even mentally rehearse a plan to attack the
victim.


* Most of these stalkers are diagnosed paraphilias and, compared to
the previous four categories, they were more likely to have
histories of sexual offense convictions.


http://www.bullyonline.org/related/stalking.htm


The stalker exhibits a familiar pattern of behaviour. Stalking often
starts as a result of rejection; rejection rage and abandonment rage
motivate the stalker to seek revenge through a predictable pattern
of stalking behavior. The stalker, usually a loner and socially
inept, becomes obsessed with their target and bombards them with
messages, emails, gifts, or abuse. The stalking behaviour can last
for years and the intensity of abuse increases over time. The abuse,
initially consisting of psychological violence, often escalates and
culminates in physical violence.


http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cyberc...erstalking.htm


A cyberstalker may send repeated, threatening, or harassing messages
by the simple push of a button; more sophisticated cyberstalkers use
programs to send messages at regular or random intervals without
being physically present at the computer terminal. California law
enforcement authorities say they have encountered situations where a
victim repeatedly receives the message "187" on their pagers - the
section of the California Penal Code for murder. In addition, a
cyberstalker can dupe other Internet users into harassing or
threatening a victim by utilizing Internet bulletin boards or chat
rooms. For example, a stalker may post a controversial or enticing
message on the board under the name, phone number, or e-mail address
of the victim, resulting in subsequent responses being sent to the
victim. Each message -- whether from the actual cyberstalker or
others -- will have the intended effect on the victim, but the
cyberstalker's effort is minimal and the lack of direct contact
between the cyberstalker and the victim can make it difficult for
law enforcement to identify, locate, and arrest the offender.






--
Brandy Alexandre

-- Everything tastes better with cat hair in it. =^.^=

What her a victim? L
Please tell me you are joking
Please
Please
Please
Tell me you got to be joking please say so
sh@t eating grin


"-L." wrote in message
ups.com...

Brandy Alexandre wrote:
BTW, why are you always so willing to let Phil make a fool out of
you leading you down these garden paths? You've become part of his
psychosis.

http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm

Oh yes, Karleen, you're such a victim!!!

Don't flatter yourself.

-L.

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...
Matthew AKA NMR ( NO MORE RETAIL ) 10 points a troll
@linethetrollsup.com wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:


"Phil P." wrote in message
news:sKlRf.22820$_f4.3882@trnddc03...

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in
message ...


I agree with you Charlie. That's paranoia and too much TV.


Ain't that a hoot! You went on Court TV to try to sue a
boyfriend for breaking up with you- and lost. If this happened
to your cat, you'd be screaming SUE SUE SUE all over the
internet. You'd milk the tragedy for every drop of attention for
yourself that you could ring out it.


Remember the judge even laughed at her along with the audience




Yeah right. You've seen it. Is that what you're lying about this
time? I sue my boyfriend for unpaid royalties and I won. The rest was
undue hardship for the money not being paid, which was not awarded.


You're a sleazy liar:

"The plaintiff, Brandy Alexandre, is a pornographic movie actress who's
suing her ex- lover for royalties she claims he agreed to pay her for one of
the movies she was in, as well as pain and suffering caused by the break-up
of the relationship. She's seeking $5000. The defendant, John Stagliano,
says he doesn't owe Ms. Alexandre a thing, and that any royalties that may
have been due were offset by his payment of medical bills which the
plaintiff incurred while she was in hospital. This is the case we call Porn
To Lose."
Judge Wapner ruled in Alexandre's favor for $1228. But she got nothing for
pain and suffering."If I let you get away with money damages because you
took the break-up harder than he did," said Judge Wapner, "every woman in
California who's ever been jilted would be filing suit tomorrow."

http://www.lukeford.com/stars/female...alexandre.html



You've got to lay off the crack and cocaine because they're burning out the
few brain cells you have left.

"Phil P." writes:

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...

I sue my boyfriend for unpaid royalties and I won. The rest was
undue hardship for the money not being paid, which was not awarded.

You're a sleazy liar:

Judge Wapner ruled in Alexandre's favor for $1228. But she got nothing for
pain and suffering.

Maybe I'm missing something, but what you said and what Brandy said
are the same thing. She said she got unpaid royalties (the $1228,
right?) but nothing else.
Not sure what this has to do with kitties.

Stacia

"Glitter Ninja" wrote in message
...
"Phil P." writes:

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...

I sue my boyfriend for unpaid royalties and I won. The rest was
undue hardship for the money not being paid, which was not awarded.

You're a sleazy liar:

Judge Wapner ruled in Alexandre's favor for $1228. But she got nothing
for
pain and suffering.

Maybe I'm missing something, but what you said and what Brandy said
are the same thing.

You're right. You are missing something. The sleaze said she sued her
boyfriend for unpaid royalties and for the "undue hardship for the money not
being paid" when in fact she tried to sue her boyfriend for unpaid
royalties, as well as *pain and suffering caused by the break-up of the
relationship.*. Got it, now?

Stacia is right Phil this original thread is about Candace's loss of
Scottie and it should remain that way

Us and a few other can stand Brandi , karleen, margarita salt or what ever
she goes by

But Glitter is right Phil we should concentrate on helping Candance if we
can. You are doing a great job of doing it right now. I am glad we have
you and a few others out here to help us.

We just need to ignore the has been if we can I know she is such a easy
target and a good laugh but I think we can restrain ourselves. Whatcha
think there Phil?

We can start our own thread if we want or add her to the other post about
John doe and add her to the voting list ;-)


"Glitter Ninja" wrote in message
...
"Phil P." writes:

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...

I sue my boyfriend for unpaid royalties and I won. The rest was
undue hardship for the money not being paid, which was not awarded.

You're a sleazy liar:

Judge Wapner ruled in Alexandre's favor for $1228. But she got nothing for
pain and suffering.

Maybe I'm missing something, but what you said and what Brandy said
are the same thing. She said she got unpaid royalties (the $1228,
right?) but nothing else.
Not sure what this has to do with kitties.

Stacia

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in message
...
Matthew AKA NMR ( NO MORE RETAIL ) 10 points a troll
@linethetrollsup.com wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav:


"Phil P." wrote in message
news:sKlRf.22820$_f4.3882@trnddc03...

"Brandy Alexandre" wrote in
message ...


I agree with you Charlie. That's paranoia and too much TV.


Ain't that a hoot! You went on Court TV to try to sue a
boyfriend for breaking up with you- and lost. If this happened
to your cat, you'd be screaming SUE SUE SUE all over the
internet. You'd milk the tragedy for every drop of attention for
yourself that you could ring out it.


Remember the judge even laughed at her along with the audience


BTW, why are you always so willing to let Phil make a fool out of
you leading you down these garden paths? You've become part of his
psychosis.

http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm


Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person"


Wow! You really are delusional! First of all, animal abusing crack whore, I
was posting here long before you infested this group. Thus, you followed me
here. Second, I'm not harassing you, sleaze, I'm ridiculing you because
you're an animal abusing crack whore. If you finished high school, you
would have known the difference between harassment and ridicule.