And...

On 20/04/2010 20:55, BfloPolska wrote:
On Apr 20, 1:32 pm, wrote:
... I was beginning to wonder why some pets is the USA are on medication
for depression...

As I said earlier... You're ****ing nutters!

When I'm toasted I'm delicious.

Blessed be,
Baha


I think Hitler had the same idea for the Jews in the 40's?

20.4.2010 22:54, Lurker kirjoitti:
On 20/04/2010 20:50, Christine BA wrote:

And where in these previous posts is age in reference to wisdom and
intelligence referred to?
That was elsewhere in the thread.


You were referring to my claims of not knowing a poster if I were to
suggest they found their rebuttal in a school yard...

If you were not making a point of how old they were... what exactly were
you trying to say?

Please be a little clearer this time as my back is hurting from
attempting to stoop to your level...


Well, like *I* said, that was elsewhere on the thread. This case of not
knowing the poster was another one.

--
Christine in Finland
christal63 (at) gmail (dot) com

Lurker wrote:

On 20/04/2010 20:38, wrote:

Some people stand up and say... you're cruel to look at animals as
pets... You're cruel to deny them their natural environment whilst
dressing them in fluffy boots and feeding them anti-depressants...

PETA nutter... speaking of nutters.

I'm a nutter for openly condemning those that treat genetically wild
animals as pets?

Domestic cats are *not* genetically wild. That's what "domesticated"
means. They have been selectively bred over many centuries to be
dependent on humans for their survival, along with dogs, sheep, and
many other species.

I'm very much against keeping wild animals as pets, btw.

Joyce
--
Cats are rather delicate creatures and they are subject to a good
many ailments, but I never heard of one who suffered from insomnia.
-- Joseph Wood Krutch

On 20/04/2010 21:02, Christine BA wrote:
20.4.2010 22:58, Lurker kirjoitti:

Not all humans... just those that wear crosses and mumble prayers to an
invisible man in the sky... Mostly on his day off!! How rude is that?

Also... why pray if he's supposed to have a divine plan?

If your prayers aren't answered you'll claim it's Gods will... but if
it's Gods will then why bother praying in the first place?

You see... religion is fundamentally flawed... but you're too dumb to
see it


And where did I state that I pray?? Or even that I'm Christian??


CHRISTine... Did you not type the following...

How is Sunday the first day of the week? Isn't it the seventh day of the
week, when God rested after creating the world. Ok, so I'm not very
religious, but that's how I see it.

?

Not very pretty much means there's some of you that is...

On 20/04/2010 21:02, Kyla =^..^= wrote:
"Lurker"
On 20/04/2010 19:50, Stormmee wrote:
or in fact if you can't live with it, the alternative would be pleaseant
for
the human gene pool, Lee


You thank God frequently which would make you a religious person... Yet
here you are wishing another human dead?

And exactly what church is it you belong to?

Can you not see the flaws in your personality?

See, Gary can't get enough attention to suit his needs on the music ng, so
he has to come here and bash us..pathetic he is..YAWN
Kyla
--who thanks God all the time too and counts her blessings as well.




Not a Gary... sorry.

Lurker wrote:
On 20/04/2010 18:39, MLB wrote:

Takes one to know one!

Now 'there's' an intelligent reply...

What school yard did you pick that gem up from?

=============
Oops! looks like it hit a nerve.

20.4.2010 23:12, Lurker kirjoitti:
On 20/04/2010 21:02, Christine BA wrote:

And where did I state that I pray?? Or even that I'm Christian??


CHRISTine... Did you not type the following...

How is Sunday the first day of the week? Isn't it the seventh day of the
week, when God rested after creating the world. Ok, so I'm not very
religious, but that's how I see it.


So if my name's Christine I have to be Christian?? Hmmm... Interesting,
I'll let my parents know this little tidbit of wisdom.

Over here, Sunday's the last day of the week, at least on all the
calendars...

--
Christine in Finland
christal63 (at) gmail (dot) com

On 20/04/2010 21:10, wrote:
Lurker wrote:

On 20/04/2010 20:38, wrote:

Some people stand up and say... you're cruel to look at animals as
pets... You're cruel to deny them their natural environment whilst
dressing them in fluffy boots and feeding them anti-depressants...

PETA nutter... speaking of nutters.

I'm a nutter for openly condemning those that treat genetically wild
animals as pets?

Domestic cats are *not* genetically wild. That's what "domesticated"
means. They have been selectively bred over many centuries to be
dependent on humans for their survival, along with dogs, sheep, and
many other species.




Sit a baby in a room without any verbal communication throughout it's
infancy and it'll not know what you're saying once it reaches 13 and you
start talking to it.

Cats aren't born domesticated... they're natural predators that
instincly want to hunt for their food. You begin the domesticating
process the moment you begin to wipe their asses and open tins for
them... But i's gone way beyond that now, hasn't it? Anti-depressents
and woolly jackets...

How long before people start dying them to match their shoes? Oh...
they already do!


I'm very much against keeping wild animals as pets, btw.

Then don't

On 20/04/2010 21:05, Christine BA wrote:
20.4.2010 22:54, Lurker kirjoitti:
On 20/04/2010 20:50, Christine BA wrote:

And where in these previous posts is age in reference to wisdom and
intelligence referred to?
That was elsewhere in the thread.


You were referring to my claims of not knowing a poster if I were to
suggest they found their rebuttal in a school yard...

If you were not making a point of how old they were... what exactly were
you trying to say?

Please be a little clearer this time as my back is hurting from
attempting to stoop to your level...


Well, like *I* said, that was elsewhere on the thread. This case of not
knowing the poster was another one.



Not too clued up on how Usenet works... are you?

self delusion is a good thing for you I am sure, Lee
"Lurker" wrote in message
...
On 20/04/2010 20:05, Stormmee wrote:
ok i won't post further to you, you are at such a definite disatvantage
it


I don't see any disadvantages in realizing the world is more than 5,000
years old... along with not believing all the other stupid theories the
bible spews forth...

I prefer to think myself as an educated and well informed individual.