If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan M" wrote in message news Well it was so many lies on the table. And you still haven't told the truth. But you will! Oh yes you will! Can you say "plonk"? You ain't smart enough to plonk it's just a word you learned on here. Its just a word mate BTW: Say hello to Dylan, I know he's right there. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan M" wrote So you are saying that the only people associated with the cat groups to whom you gave your cell phone is myself, Tracy, Rhonda, and Charlie? Because this is the only way that your assumption might make sense. That is EXACTLY what I am saying! Are you sure? Because this is a very serious allegation. Are you saying that you have never given your cell number to anyone but us? Think Dan. I have a feeling that this cannot be true. In fact, I imagine that anyone with the time and inclination to Google anecdotes will find proof that this is not true. I think you are forgetting someone to whom you gave your cell number. If you recall, I asked your permission before I gave it to anyone. And I did not give it to anyone I did not tell you I was going to give it to. I see. All you had to do was tell us this. How on earth would you have ever come to believe that any of us who wanted you to save Conan would threaten you? This just makes no sense to me. I'm not even going to answer this. I've answered it so many times before that I've grown tired of repeating myself. Would anybody else try to give it a try? Well, yes. I will indeed let it drop. But I want you to put yourself in our places. If you had care enough to put all this thought into helping this cat, and had not done anything wrong at all, just to be betrayed as you betrayed us with no explanation--you would at least want an explanation. You handled this thing very badly--but I am left with the impression that I was not wrong to trust you. I was wrong to trust you to draw the right conclusions regarding any threatening calls you may have received. It is ludicrous that you blamed us, the very people who were relying upon your help. That said, if stupidity were illegal, the already overcrowded prisons would indeed be in trouble. Thank you, Dan, for finally coming clean. I am sorry you had to go through this. In the future, use your head. You had no reason to believe that any one of Conan/Dylan's well wishers would hurt you. And above all, be honest. There is rarely a reason for a good person to lie. And I do think you are a good person. And please use your head as well. What could have possibly lead you to believe that spewing the venom you've been dispensing so freely recently could in any way be justified? You are either a hateful woman or an immature one. Or just an effective one. I got my explanation--which is something you owed me, and all of the people who trusted you, and to whom you lied merely out of cowardice. Whoever called you was no friend of mine, or Tracy's or Rhonda's or Dan's. And they had the exact effect on you that they wanted to. They frightened you. It certainly takes a sick person to do that. The mistake you made was deciding it was one of us. THINK about it. It makes no sense. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean B." wrote in message ... Dan M wrote: Why not take this opportunity to explain what happened between the time you promised us you would pick him up, then lied to us about picking him up? I had always seen you as an upright guy. Do you actually believe that I would have made threatening calls to you when you were doing me a favor for which I had never stopped expressing my deep gratitude? And why would I do that? So you can warp my words again? If you will reread my previous posts you'll see that I never claimed you made threatening calls. I said that I had received threatening calls, and I never identified who they were from. In fact, I don't know who they were from, and I frankly don't want to know. All I need to know is that it was a sick and twisted individual. Honestly, Dan, I just want to understand. I trusted you, as did Tracy, Rhonda, and Charlie. And I have given you no reason to suggest that I do not care about cats, particularly about Conan/Dylan in particular. I have merely been trying to get you to explain your actions. I think everyone, including me, actually wants you to have had good reasons to betray us, or to think that you had. Because not one of us did a thing but spend time and effort trying to save that cat. Just tell the truth--people just want to understand. No, I don't think they do. I think they *want* to get enraged and they *want* to act like flaming assholes. Many of the people who have posting on this topic must be mentally deranged to post the crap they do. You are a prime example - replying to somebody's posts and adding your comments as if they were sent by the original poster? That's underhanded, deceitful, and inexcusable. The fact of the matter is that I will never apologize for anything I have to do to insure the safety of myself, my family, or my animals. If I have to tell a minor untruth to get some twisted psycho off my ass and away from my loved ones, then you better believe that's exactly what I'm going to do. When someone makes physical threats against me, I take it seriously. Even when it's done over Usenet or by some twisted coward who hides behind anonymous phone calls. Anyway, that being said, and making the (perhaps erroneous) assumption that at last one reader of this groups is really interested in what has been happening with Conan/Dylan (Dylan is really a much better name - he's definitely not a "Conan"), here it is: I left for the shelter to get the cat. While on the freeway I got a call from some twisted psycho sack of s**t who said offered up some threats if I followed through on picking up the cat. The only people who knew when I was going to be on the road to the shelter were a small group I had been exchanging e-mail with. Whether the call came from someone in that list or just someone acquainted with someone on that list is impossible to determine. Either way, it meant that I wasn't going to have anything to do with anyone in that e-mail group. I knew of other people interested in finding Conan a good home, so I picked him up and worked with them to find the cat a good home. Not a "good enough" home, but a good home. He had to spend about a week in a boarding kennel, the rest of the time he was at my house with my cats. During the time he was in the kennel I made about every-other-day trips out to visit and play with him, and the staff allowed him out of his enclosure every day. He was not in a steel cage, he was in a nicely-appointed enclosure with lots of room and a comfortable place to sleep. During that time we looked into several "good enough" homes, but held out for something really appropriate. We have now found that. There, now, is the complete story of Conan/Dylan. If you really and truly care about cats and if your only concern through this whole episode was only Conan's well-being, then let the issue drop. Conan was always well cared for, he did not have to endure long days in stell cages, and he is in a nice, comfortable house. That is, I believe, the goal that everybody had been spouting. Since that goal has been realized, you no longer have any reason to spew your venom, crosspost like an idiot, and make harrassing posts. Dan Finally. The truth. That is what we wanted. You could have saved many people lots of grief if you had spoken up sooner. -- Jean B. Hi Jean B. No, this is not the truth. Dylan is with Dan. This is why all the lies. Who would lie about a kennel. Who would like about a decent home. No one would, but Dan sho layed out the lies. It's cause he's got the cat. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"Philip" wrote in message k.net... "Mary" wrote in message ... "Charlie Wilkes" wrote in message ... On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 06:24:32 GMT, Kitkat wrote: rich wrote: Charlie Wilkes wrote: If you really cared about cats, you'd save your pennies for the ones nobody else is interested in. You just want to be the center of attention. In light of that just what are YOU doing to help in this area? At least through Monica's and others help one cat has a true home. Just what have you done other that shoot your mouth off? Well, I believe he detailed his rescue of a cat who was splattered across the pavement. Tweaker is her name. He nursed her back to health. Pam, who thinks that counts for a lot Thank you. Tweaker is a boy, BTW. See, it isn't just me! He kind of looks like a girl in the photos I have seen. Isn't he kind of small for a boy? I fell short of being the perfect cat lover when I rescued Tweaker because I did not immediately take him to the 24 hour emergency vet. I decided to see whether he would die or get better. When it became clear that recovery was his fortune, only then did he get vetted. My heart is not pure in terms of my attitude toward the welfare of cats. A dark streak of practicality pollutes it. I am morally defective by the standards of this group. Nevertheless, Cat Karma smiled upon me broadly when I got Tweaker. He is just the cat for me. He is predisposed to be friendly to all people and dogs. He is tidy and low-key. He seems eager for new experiences and he's having quite a few. Join the morally defective club, Charlie. I have been demonized for doing nothing but trying to help Conan. Mary, you have been demonized for doing MUCH MORE ... FAR beyond the call of necessity for Conan's sake. Where was necessity when Conan needed it Philip! It was necessary for you to return him? |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
"Snittens" wrote in message ... "cmtowle" wrote in message news:bTZCe.1979235$Xk.1047181@pd7tw3no... As promised, a final update to let everyone who is interested know that Conan (now "Dylan" which we thought a more gentle name) has indeed been homed with wonderful cat-loving humans and a feline friend. He is a loving and lovable kitty lapping up all of the attention and affection he is getting. To those who had the courage to post and/or e-mail their continued support and who offered to help in so many ways, thank you. You continued to trust that we were doing everything right to ensure a great life for this cat. That mattered to us. snip Thank you for all your hard work in finding this kitty a great home! -Kelly Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear. I have read every single post Dan made since this happened. Every word. He's lying, he's still lying. But alas we know the truth. Dan has got the cat. Dan wanted him. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Dan M wrote:
There, now, is the complete story of Conan/Dylan. If you really and truly care about cats and if your only concern through this whole episode was only Conan's well-being, then let the issue drop. Conan was always well cared for, he did not have to endure long days in stell cages, and he is in a nice, comfortable house. That is, I believe, the goal that everybody had been spouting. Since that goal has been realized, you no longer have any reason to spew your venom, crosspost like an idiot, and make harrassing posts. That's very interesting. I'm glad you posted this because I, for one, really wondered what happened that day. You always seemed like a nice guy on rpca and it didn't make sense. I'm glad Dylan is in a good home and that he spent part of his transition time at your house rather than caged. I am sure, however, that it was no one in Mary's "group" who threatened you. It was probably the same person who posted that they had called the shelter on that Monday. It was someone posting through Cat KB, I think. It was unfortunate that there were so many misunderstandings/hurt feelings along the way. I am sure everyone is happy that Conan is safe and in his own home now. You, no doubt, made the decision that you felt was necessary but it is understandable that others did not feel the same way and had thought you were all working together. Mary has said that all she wanted was an explanation and you have provided it so that is good of you and, hopefully, the Conan/Dylan threads can come to an end soon. Candace |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan M" wrote in message news Mary wrote: So you are saying that the only people associated with the cat groups to whom you gave your cell phone is myself, Tracy, Rhonda, and Charlie? ... Dan replied: That is EXACTLY what I am saying! Dan, I hope you saved that threatening message on your cell phone. I imagine someone never thought of that when he or she made that call. Maybe that someone is wondering if you have it or not. I hope this whole thing ends without additional nastiness, but if it continues, that recording could be useful. And, thank you for letting us all know what happened and that Dylan is doing fine. Annie |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
"Annie Wxill" wrote in message ... "Dan M" wrote in message news Mary wrote: So you are saying that the only people associated with the cat groups to whom you gave your cell phone is myself, Tracy, Rhonda, and Charlie? ... Dan replied: That is EXACTLY what I am saying! Dan, I hope you saved that threatening message on your cell phone. I imagine someone never thought of that when he or she made that call. Maybe that someone is wondering if you have it or not. I hope this whole thing ends without additional nastiness, but if it continues, that recording could be useful. And, thank you for letting us all know what happened and that Dylan is doing fine. Dan says it was a male. So he has always known it was not me. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-07-19 11:28:53 -0700, Dan M said:
Anyway, that being said, and making the (perhaps erroneous) assumption that at last one reader of this groups is really interested in what has been happening with Conan/Dylan (Dylan is really a much better name - he's definitely not a "Conan"), here it is: I left for the shelter to get the cat. While on the freeway I got a call from some twisted psycho sack of s**t who said offered up some threats if I followed through on picking up the cat. The only people who knew when I was going to be on the road to the shelter were a small group I had been exchanging e-mail with. Whether the call came from someone in that list or just someone acquainted with someone on that list is impossible to determine. Either way, it meant that I wasn't going to have anything to do with anyone in that e-mail group. I knew of other people interested in finding Conan a good home, so I picked him up and worked with them to find the cat a good home. Not a "good enough" home, but a good home. He had to spend about a week in a boarding kennel, the rest of the time he was at my house with my cats. During the time he was in the kennel I made about every-other-day trips out to visit and play with him, and the staff allowed him out of his enclosure every day. He was not in a steel cage, he was in a nicely-appointed enclosure with lots of room and a comfortable place to sleep. During that time we looked into several "good enough" homes, but held out for something really appropriate. We have now found that. There, now, is the complete story of Conan/Dylan. If you really and truly care about cats and if your only concern through this whole episode was only Conan's well-being, then let the issue drop. Conan was always well cared for, he did not have to endure long days in stell cages, and he is in a nice, comfortable house. That is, I believe, the goal that everybody had been spouting. Since that goal has been realized, you no longer have any reason to spew your venom, crosspost like an idiot, and make harrassing posts. Thank you, Dan. I did, actually, want to know what happened with Dylan and appreciate the summary of why you changed your mind at the last minute. Makes perfect sense to me, actually. Take care, b |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
"whitershadeofpale" wrote in message ... "Philip" wrote in message k.net... "Mary" wrote in message ... "Charlie Wilkes" wrote in message ... On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:01:26 GMT, "Philip" wrote: "Charlie Wilkes" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:49:43 GMT, "cmtowle" wrote: The relentless net sleuthing, the negative spins, the threats, and the outrageous theories you came up with would be laughable if a cat's future had not been at stake. Who are you trying to kid with this pious horse****? Cats get killed and plowed into landfills every day, by the thousands. What makes any one of them more important than all the rest? If you really cared about cats, you'd save your pennies for the ones nobody else is interested in. You just want to be the center of attention. Charlie Charlie. Your moments of sophistry, such as the one above, are evolving from an occasional fault to a regular feature. It ain't my sophistry, brother. I borrowed it from the moralizing baboons with whom you have encamped yourself. Monica is all worked up about how a cat's future is at stake. I'm trying to put that concern into some kind of realistic context. Philip is not encamped with Monica. She has some very nasty things to say about him in email. She was as concerned as all of us were about Philip's abandonment of Conan/Dylan. But she offered nothing until Charlie stepped up to the plate and offered to adopt him. Prove it Mary. She don't owe you gotdamn thang! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU I hope I hope I hope Mary sues your tail for antagonizing her during this wholet thing., I have BCC'd copies of the pertainent emails Mary made that included my screen name. You can bring suit for any reason in this country. But bringing suit does in no way guarantee a judgement favorable to the one bringing the suit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conan: New home? | Alison | Cat health & behaviour | 35 | July 19th 05 05:16 PM |
Conan: New home? | Charlie Wilkes | Cat anecdotes | 4 | July 17th 05 07:17 PM |
Conan Hysteria and a Challenge | [email protected] | Cat health & behaviour | 308 | July 11th 05 06:58 AM |
No San Diego Home for Conan | CatNipped | Cat anecdotes | 126 | July 10th 05 06:13 AM |
Hoping to get home | Dan M | Cat anecdotes | 34 | December 21st 04 02:20 PM |