A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat health & behaviour
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

There you have it folks ...(was Purrs for Dan)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 8th 05, 05:37 PM
Candace
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



-L. wrote:
Charlie Wilkes wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:40:23 -0700, Dan M wrote:

Everybody, just keep adding this idiot's sock puppet addresses to your
kill files.


I'm through with the socks. I don't need them, Dan.

How's Conan, BTW? Are we still on for the airlift???

Charlie


I guess I don't understand why this would be proof of anything. This
just occurred. What does it have to do with June 28th? I believe
Charlie is being *sarcastic*.

Charlie was the first option. Then when his Google history became an
issue, the SD guy and Meghan's sister became the more likely options,
with Charlie's blessing.

Candace

  #12  
Old July 9th 05, 01:23 AM
Meghan Noecker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8 Jul 2005 01:14:25 -0700, "-L." wrote:

Direct proof that Mary's plan was to send Conan to Charlie. There was
never any plan to home him in CA. She's a busted liar.



Well, this is the email I received that Monday night, when nobody knew
Dan had changed the plans:

No one is giving up. We just decided to stop planning on the
newsgroup. Please keep it to yourself for the moment (Candace knows as
well), but Dan will pick the cat up tomorrow. He found a vet two
blocks from his house that can temporarily board the cat for $10/day.


There is an adoption possibility in San Diego, one in the Bay Area,
your sister and Charlie. One of them will work out and transport will
be arranged.


We're prioritizing in terms of distance the kitty has to travel, so
are waiting to hear on the San Diego option - which sounds promising
(just lost a 17 year old cat a few months ago) and then will work our
way back up to Seattle if necessary.


Mary is, I expect, obfuscating the issue to prevent more calls to the
shelter.


I think it'll work out fine - collections will happen after the kitty
is safely placed.
************************************************** ***************************

I certainly understood it to mean that local options would be first,
and he'd only go on a flight if those didn't work out.


--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
  #13  
Old July 9th 05, 01:39 AM
-L.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Meghan Noecker wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005 01:14:25 -0700, "-L." wrote:

Direct proof that Mary's plan was to send Conan to Charlie. There was
never any plan to home him in CA. She's a busted liar.



Well, this is the email I received that Monday night, when nobody knew
Dan had changed the plans:

No one is giving up. We just decided to stop planning on the
newsgroup. Please keep it to yourself for the moment (Candace knows as
well), but Dan will pick the cat up tomorrow. He found a vet two
blocks from his house that can temporarily board the cat for $10/day.



You mean Conan was going to be kept in a CAGE!! A CAGE!! A CAGE!! A
CAGE!! A ****ing, goddamned CAGE!!
Gee...where have I heard that before?



There is an adoption possibility in San Diego, one in the Bay Area,
your sister and Charlie. One of them will work out and transport will
be arranged.


Um hum. IOW, "Let's hand the cat off to whomever will take him."


We're prioritizing in terms of distance the kitty has to travel, so
are waiting to hear on the San Diego option - which sounds promising
(just lost a 17 year old cat a few months ago) and then will work our
way back up to Seattle if necessary.


So the indignantion isn't so much that Conan was going to be kept in a
CAGE (despite Mary's constant bellowing) but that he wasn't placed in
San Diego.



Mary is, I expect, obfuscating the issue to prevent more calls to the
shelter.


That's the stupidest ****ing logic I have ever heard: "Let's say the
cat is still at the shelter and still at risk for being euthanized so
that people will stop calling the shelter."

If the cat was supposedly still at risk for euthanization, people are
MORE LIKELY to do something about it - call the shelter, or, as
happened - go get the cat. And that's *exactly* what happened. She
has no one to blame for where Conan is now but herself, for being such
a bloody idiot.

snip

And Charlie was still waiting for "lift-off", as that was still a
viable option.


-L.

  #14  
Old July 9th 05, 01:41 AM
Mary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"-L." wrote in message
oups.com...


Meghan Noecker wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005 01:14:25 -0700, "-L." wrote:

Direct proof that Mary's plan was to send Conan to Charlie. There was
never any plan to home him in CA. She's a busted liar.



Well, this is the email I received that Monday night, when nobody knew
Dan had changed the plans:

No one is giving up. We just decided to stop planning on the
newsgroup. Please keep it to yourself for the moment (Candace knows as
well), but Dan will pick the cat up tomorrow. He found a vet two
blocks from his house that can temporarily board the cat for $10/day.



You mean Conan was going to be kept in a CAGE!! A CAGE!! A CAGE!! A
CAGE!! A ****ing, goddamned CAGE!!


For one or two nights, you hidous shrew, Not for 11 and counting.


There is an adoption possibility in San Diego, one in the Bay Area,
your sister and Charlie. One of them will work out and transport will
be arranged.


Um hum. IOW, "Let's hand the cat off to whomever will take him."


We're prioritizing in terms of distance the kitty has to travel, so
are waiting to hear on the San Diego option - which sounds promising
(just lost a 17 year old cat a few months ago) and then will work our
way back up to Seattle if necessary.


So the indignantion isn't so much that Conan was going to be kept in a
CAGE (despite Mary's constant bellowing) but that he wasn't placed in
San Diego.


With a good man who would have cared for him.

Do you somehow imagine that anyone thinks you care about this cat?

Try to understand this, Lynnie: almost everyone is quicker on the uptake
than you are. Now think about it for a minute. Now think about how
you have presented yourself over the past few months. Get it?
Hmm?


  #15  
Old July 9th 05, 01:46 AM
-L.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mary wrote:
For one or two nights, you hidous shrew, Not for 11 and counting.


"You have no one to blame for where Conan is now but yourself, for
being such
a bloody idiot."

Hum. Seems like a good sig line to me.

-L.

  #16  
Old July 9th 05, 01:49 AM
Trish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"whitershadeofpale" wrote in message
oups.com...


-L. wrote:

You mean Conan was going to be kept in a CAGE!! A CAGE!! A CAGE!! A
CAGE!! A ****ing, goddamned CAGE!!
Gee...where have I heard that before?


Greeaat day, still at it uh?

Here ya go sugar plum, I've been saving this for special times like
these.

http://www.barryparrish.com/HEREYAGO.jpg

Toodles.


LOL!


  #17  
Old July 9th 05, 01:50 AM
whitershadeofpale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



-L. wrote:

You mean Conan was going to be kept in a CAGE!! A CAGE!! A CAGE!! A
CAGE!! A ****ing, goddamned CAGE!!
Gee...where have I heard that before?


Greeaat day, still at it uh?

Here ya go sugar plum, I've been saving this for special times like
these.

http://www.barryparrish.com/HEREYAGO.jpg

Toodles.

  #18  
Old July 9th 05, 01:51 AM
Meghan Noecker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 8 Jul 2005 17:39:00 -0700, "-L." wrote:



You mean Conan was going to be kept in a CAGE!! A CAGE!! A CAGE!! A
CAGE!! A ****ing, goddamned CAGE!!
Gee...where have I heard that before?


For only a day or a few. At most, it would have been 4 nights. If San
Diego had not worked out, he would have been ona flight that Saturday
to Washington. So, he certainly wouldn't be sitting in a cage still
today.


Um hum. IOW, "Let's hand the cat off to whomever will take him."

Well, that's better than handing him to somebody who doesn't want him.


So the indignantion isn't so much that Conan was going to be kept in a
CAGE (despite Mary's constant bellowing) but that he wasn't placed in
San Diego.

No, the indigination is that he is *still* in a cage 11 days later.
And no sign of a home in the near future.


--
Meghan & the Zoo Crew
Equine and Pet Photography
http://www.zoocrewphoto.com
  #19  
Old July 9th 05, 01:53 AM
-L.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Meghan Noecker wrote:
No, the indigination is that he is *still* in a cage 11 days later.
And no sign of a home in the near future.


"Mary has no one to blame for where Conan is now but herself, for being
such
a bloody idiot."

-L.

  #20  
Old July 9th 05, 01:54 AM
Kitkat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-L. wrote:

Meghan Noecker wrote:

No, the indigination is that he is *still* in a cage 11 days later.
And no sign of a home in the near future.



"Mary has no one to blame for where Conan is now but herself, for being
such
a bloody idiot."

-L.

Hey,Lyn...didn't you say about 5 or 6 (billion) times that you were DONE
with this discussion?!?!?!!???!!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What the Bleep & Job purrs [email protected] Cat anecdotes 58 August 30th 04 01:35 AM
Mama Zoo UPDATE - keep purrs coming JoJo Cat anecdotes 27 June 14th 04 05:55 PM
Purrs needed yet again please! Mama Zoo JoJo Cat anecdotes 60 June 13th 04 09:11 PM
Purrs for a Peaceful Passing Lucy's Mom Cat anecdotes 36 May 16th 04 04:24 PM
Foster Kitty Needs Purrs JoJo Cat anecdotes 44 April 21st 04 05:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.