If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25*am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo *wrote: * From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? *The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: *proved. * * That doesn't mean that any chickens are raised to be pet food for one thing Goob, and for another it doesn't do a thing to back up your pet food cattle idea. They said, "a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts". It sounds like, Goo, they are now sending more of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering instead of using them for human food, so they need more chickens to feed HUMANS Goober, not pets. Consumption has not increased, but the percentage of each bird that humans consume in general has been reduced for whatever reason(s) so more chickens are needed for humans. Humans are eating less of the "least desired parts" so more chickens have to be born to provide more of the desirable parts, regardless of whether the parts they are no longer eating get feed to pets, rendered, or cooked up for the homeless. LOL!! Poor stupid Goobs. He set a trap then stepped into it himself. Now he's gnawing his own leg off to get free. I don't believe Goo's at the point of knowing his own position yet. This Goober STILL thinks that cows are raised just to be pet food, and now he thinks chickens are too. It may be another period of years again before Goo figures out how stupid he's being right now...IF he ever does figure it out at all. What must the Goober think? He believes some chickens are raised specifically to be pet food but can't say for how long, so let's say for Goo that it's 6-8 weeks and if he wants to say it's longer or shorter that's up to Goo. Does Goo believe that entire chicken houses are filled with birds being raised only to become pet food? Or does Goo think that maybe a portion of many houses contain birds that will become pet food? Let's say for Goo since he won't/can't say for himself, that he believes entire houses are filled with pet food chickens since he believed entire herds of cattle were raised for pet food and most likely he still does. So, we can conclude that the Goober believes there are entire chicken houses filled with chickens which he thinks will be raised for 6-8 weeks only to become pet food, with each entire bird being used only for pet food. LOL!!! It's incredibly stupid, but that's what Goo must believe. Either that or he must think that what we consider the prime parts of the pet food chickens are regarded as "less desirable" parts in the pet food industry, and so are sold as by-products to the human market. LOL!!! Either way, WHAT A GOOBER! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Mar 31, 6:22*pm, dh@. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25*am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo *wrote: * From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? *The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: *proved.. * * That doesn't mean that any chickens are raised to be pet food for one thing Goob, and for another it doesn't do a thing to back up your pet food cattle idea. They said, "a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts". It sounds like, Goo, they are now sending more of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering instead of using them for human food, so they need more chickens to feed HUMANS Goober, not pets. Consumption has not increased, but the percentage of each bird that humans consume in general has been reduced for whatever reason(s) so more chickens are needed for humans. Humans are eating less of the "least desired parts" so more chickens have to be born to provide more of the desirable parts, regardless of whether the parts they are no longer eating get feed to pets, rendered, or cooked up for the homeless. LOL!! Poor stupid Goobs. He set a trap then stepped into it himself. Now he's gnawing his own leg off to get free. * * I don't believe Goo's at the point of knowing his own position yet. This Goober STILL thinks that cows are raised just to be pet food, and now he thinks chickens are too. It may be another period of years again before Goo figures out how stupid he's being right now...IF he ever does figure it out at all. * * What must the Goober think? He believes some chickens are raised specifically to be pet food but can't say for how long, so let's say for Goo that it's 6-8 weeks and if he wants to say it's longer or shorter that's up to Goo. Does Goo believe that entire chicken houses are filled with birds being raised only to become pet food? Or does Goo think that maybe a portion of many houses contain birds that will become pet food? Let's say for Goo since he won't/can't say for himself, that he believes entire houses are filled with pet food chickens since he believed entire herds of cattle were raised for pet food and most likely he still does. So, we can conclude that the Goober believes there are entire chicken houses filled with chickens which he thinks will be raised for 6-8 weeks only to become pet food, with each entire bird being used only for pet food. LOL!!! It's incredibly stupid, but that's what Goo must believe. Either that or he must think that what we consider the prime parts of the pet food chickens are regarded as "less desirable" parts in the pet food industry, and so are sold as by-products to the human market. LOL!!! Either way, WHAT A GOOBER! Yeh, he displayed the most incredible stupidity with his stupid 12 year old pet food cow and now he's trying to hint at the same situation with chickens, turkeys, and sheep except he's hedging his bets by not giving any ages. Wonder why Goo forgot pigs? Maybe he thinks they don't make good pet food |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On 3/31/2011 11:37 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:22 pm, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25 am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo wrote: From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: proved. That doesn't mean that LOL!! Poor I don't believe Yeh, he displayed the The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: proved. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Apr 1, 2:44*am, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/31/2011 11:37 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 31, 6:22 pm, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25 am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo *wrote: * *From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? *The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: *proved. * * *That doesn't mean that LOL!! Poor * * *I don't believe Yeh, he displayed the The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: * No one in rec.pets.cats.community participates in this discussion. Some of us may be interested in the issue but none of us seems to want to talk about it HERE. So learn to trim headers and leave off uninterested newsgroups, please. -- Will in New Haven |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Mar 31, 11:44*pm, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/31/2011 11:37 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 31, 6:22 pm, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25 am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo *wrote: * *From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? *The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: *proved. * * *That doesn't mean that LOL!! Poor * * *I don't believe Yeh, he displayed the The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: *proved.. So what? Why did you try to get people to believe that cows were being raised for TWELVE YEARS only to be pet food? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On 4/1/2011 10:32 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
On Mar 31, 11:44 pm, George wrote: On 3/31/2011 11:37 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 31, 6:22 pm, dh@. wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Mar 30, 9:25 am, dh@. wrote: On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:47:04 -0700, Goo wrote: On 3/29/2011 12:22 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 29, 12:16 pm, Goo wrote: From the USDA Animal Agriculture - 1980-2020 Chicken Growth Domestic demand for chicken has increased dramatically since the beginning of the broiler industry. Cost reduction, product innovation, and healthy image have set a pace to take chicken to first place among the meats (boneless weight) in the U.S. diet by 2010. Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption because of increased exports and a shift in tonnage of the least desired parts to pet food and rendering. Got it, ****wit and Douchebag? The number of chickens produced has increased due in part to demand for chicken in pet food. You lose. INCREASED EXPORTS,........LEAST DESIRED PARTS TO PET FOOD. "Total production has increased at a greater rate than consumption" - more chickens were produced *both* because of greater exports *AND* demand for chicken in pet food. The demand for pet food causes more animals to be produced: proved. That doesn't mean that LOL!! Poor I don't believe Yeh, he displayed the The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: proved. So what? So, you and ****wit have been denying it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
****wit David Harrison, criminal breeder of fighting birds, lied:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:33:28 -0700, George Plimpton wrote: On 4/1/2011 10:32 AM, ****stain Hamilton drooled: On Mar 31, 11:44 pm, George Plimpton wrote: The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: proved. So far you've only found evidence of cattle So far, ****wit, I've found evidence for *ALL* types of livestock: more of *ALL* kinds exist due to the demand for pet food, ****wit. So what? So, you and ****wit have been denying it. For more than one reason. For one reason only: you're stupid ****s. One is that it seems unlikely on the surface, since there is so much by-product from human food processing that ****wit: the demand for that "byproduct" causes more animals to be bred. If the demand for it weren't there, that would raise the cost of producing meat for human consumers, as someone would have to incur the cost of disposing of the waste. ****wit, you don't know anything about economics. You really are hopelessly outclassed here. Another example is that you have been able to find no evidence at all to support your claim that extra cattle need to be raised Of course I have, ****wit. Demand for meat + demand for "other stuff" from cattle = demand for cattle. The demand for cattle is higher, ****wit, because of the demand for "other stuff". Because the demand is higher, ****wit, the price paid is higher, and because the price paid is higher, the supply is higher. You really don't have a clue what you're talking about - none at all. Another is the fact that you can't provide any sort of details about ****wit: I have cited several USDA reports that confirm that more livestock are produced in part because of the demand for pet food. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:33:28 -0700, Goo wrote:
On 4/1/2011 10:32 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote: On Mar 31, 11:44 pm, Goo wrote: The demand for pet food causes more livestock animals to exist: proved. So far you've only found evidence of cattle, in only one example Goob, and in your one example they don't raise enough cattle to feed even 50 dogs. Your one example is not at all significant, but that one insignificant example is all you have. And also in your one and only example which is also insignificant, it's not the "demand" for pet food which causes those particular cattle to exist which again makes it insignificant in regards to your claim. Again, as always, you have NOTHING Goo. So what? So, you and ****wit have been denying it. For more than one reason Goober. One is that it seems unlikely on the surface, since there is so much by-product from human food processing that there's more than enough for pet food and some of it gets used for fertilizer and rendering. If we're guessing that there's more money in animal parts used for pet food than there is in animal parts that get rendered and used for fertizer, then the fact that sometimes entire animals are rendered and used for fertilizer tells us that there are already more than enough animals slaughtered to feed dogs and cats and STILL have parts left over to be rendered and used for fertilizer. Another example is that you have been able to find no evidence at all to support your claim that extra cattle need to be raised, much less our other more recent and more absurd seeming claims. You have NOTHING to back up your claims Goo, and that IS reason to doubt you. And to laugh at you too Goo. Another is the fact that you can't provide any sort of details about what it is you think you have in mind. You can't even say how long you believe these supposed pet food livestock are supposed to live, or where, or what types of animals exactly. So, Goo, even if we wanted to try to imagine your claims being true along with you, which we HAVE tried Goober!, YOU can't provide enough details about what your imagining to make it possible to consider whatever it is you think you're thinking of. It gets back to: You have NOTHING!, Goo. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pet demand for chickens
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 18:13:23 -0700, Goo lied:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:25:28 -0700, dh@. wrote: Another is the fact that you can't provide any sort of details about ****wit: I have cited several USDA reports that confirm that more livestock are produced in part because of the demand for pet food. No you have not Goo, which is why you can't produce any examples of them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cats and Chickens | Cat Lover | Cat health & behaviour | 15 | May 16th 08 02:15 AM |
Helping Meowmie shut up the chickens | Christina Websell | Cat anecdotes | 25 | September 13th 05 09:28 PM |
Helping Meowmie shut up the chickens | Kwwwaaaazzeeeee Kaaaaaattzzz | Cat health & behaviour | 0 | September 12th 05 09:24 PM |
Caring for my chickens whilst I'm away (OT) | Christina Websell | Cat anecdotes | 23 | May 14th 05 05:23 AM |
Chickens | Helen Wheels | Cat anecdotes | 2 | December 12th 04 03:16 AM |