A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat community
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Animals do not "anticipate"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old May 24th 06, 09:11 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

little impotent ****bag billie robb lied:

Leif Erikson
wrote in message


You haven't done it, billie.



You haven't answered the question regarding proof of your theory.


Think about it for a while, impotent little billie.
See if you can get close.
  #102  
Old May 25th 06, 02:46 AM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"


"little impotent ****bag Leif Erikson" lied:


You haven't answered the question regarding proof of your theory.


Think about it for a while,


So much for your asanine theories. If you can't (or won't) prove something,
then it's safe to presume you are full of ****.
L8R

--

William Robb


  #103  
Old May 25th 06, 06:15 AM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

little impotent ****bag billie robb wrote:
Leif Erikson wrote:


You haven't answered the question regarding proof of your theory.


Think about it for a while,



So much for your asanine theories.


So much for your ability to think.

Stupid fat ****.
  #104  
Old May 25th 06, 04:28 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

On Wed, 24 May 2006, a stupefied foolish Goober squealed:

I'm saying he's a fool


LOL! Well Goo, we know from many past experiences--and this one-- that
you can't back up any such claim. You're too inept to even try Goober.
  #105  
Old May 26th 06, 08:58 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

On Wed, 24 May 2006 14:06:16 -0600, "William Robb" wrote:


a consistently ignorant and inept Goober maundered:

You haven't done it, billie.


You haven't answered the question regarding proof of your theory.


Goo never does that (because he can't ;¬)

Until then, you can be as retarded as you like,


Over the years I've continued to wonder if the Goober is really as
stupid as he's making it appear he is, or if he's trying to appear stupider
than he really is...could Goo really be as stupid as he acts?

but you still have an unfounded theory.


After a while Goo usually amusingly will begin to claim that he has
supported whatever particular absurdity in the past, but mysteriously
no one is ever able to find evidence of it...not even Goo himself.

Are you the person someone is refering to as Goo, as in Goober?


His title is actually Goobernicus, but it's fun to call him Goo or Goober,
Goob is fun too.

It seems to suit you.


Yes, it defines him. Goobernicus: the moron who thinks he's a genius.
And as an extra fun bonus, a Google search for Goobernicus will confirm
it.

If you really want to waste your time on a flame war, look elsewhere. They
are boring and infantile.

Just prove your theories like an adult.


It would probably be amusing to see him try, but we can't expect the
poor inept Goober to attempt anything like that.
  #106  
Old May 26th 06, 11:57 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

****wit David Harrison, ignorant dog-sodomizing goober
cracker, blabbered:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 14:06:16 -0600, "William Robb" wrote:


Leif Erikson helpfully wrote:

You haven't done it, billie.


You haven't answered the question regarding proof of your theory.



Leif never wastes time answering the time-wasting demands of ****wits like you and me, billie.


And don't you ever forget it, ****wit.
  #107  
Old May 29th 06, 03:32 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

On Wed, 24 May 2006 13:29:19 -0600, "William Robb"
wrote:


"Leif Erikson" ****wit, ignorant pig-sodomizing fool
wrote in message


No animal benefits from coming into existence, ****wit. This is
established.


This may be redundant, but I enjoy taking candy from children so, precisely
who established this little gem?


LOL!!! Excellent question. And the answer is: Goo amusingly thinks
that *he* did.

You need to be specific; ie: which think tank, university faculty or
whatever.
Hopefully it isn't just one deranged person's ravings.


Well, not very surprisingly, it is. This is really one of Goo's more absurd
claims, though by now I'm so used to seeing him prance it about I usually
don't make much response to it. The Goober foolishly believes that just
because his imaginary non-existent "entities" (ines) can not benefit from life,
neither can animals who actually live. Goo now claims this to be true, even
though during a brief period of less confusion the Goober was able to consider
that: "EVEN WITH the very best animal welfare conditions one might provide:
they STILL might not be as good as the "pre-existence" state was for the
animals; one simply cannot know." Now Goo claims that *he* does know,
yet he has been unable to explain how he found out...or at least unwilling
to. Maybe you'll have better luck, but I don't believe the Goober has it in him
to figure out what he thinks himself, much less try to explain it. Goo needs to
explain:

1. how the inability of ines to benefit from life, could possibly prevent living
creatures from benefitting from life

2. how he found out that even the very best animal welfare conditions are
not as good as his imagined "pre-existence" state was for the animals

but Goo fails....
  #108  
Old May 29th 06, 03:36 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

On 24 May 2006, a both inept and cowardly Goober wrote:

little impotent ****bag Billie Robb wrote:

Goo lied:


No animal benefits from coming into existence, ****wit. This is
established.



This may be redundant, but I enjoy taking candy from children


You


NO Goober! That's exactly why you are such an inept and lame
maunderer! In an effort to rise above remaining the complete failure
that you as yet have proven yourself to be (and also to provide more
Goobal absurdity for people to laugh at), just try to answer the man's
question for once in your ineptly useless and unbeneficial existence,
Goo! TRY to answer!!!
  #109  
Old May 29th 06, 05:40 PM posted to rec.animals.wildlife,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.pets.cats.community,rec.pets.dogs.behavior
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Animals do not "anticipate"

****wit David Harrison, ignorant lying dog-sodomizing
goober cracker, lied:

On 24 May 2006, Leif Erikson helpfully wrote:


little impotent ****bag Billie Robb wrote:


Leif Erikson helpfully wrote:



No animal benefits from coming into existence, ****wit. This is
established.


This may be redundant, but I enjoy taking candy from children


You haven't done it, little impotent ****bag billie.



NO Leif!


RIGHT, ****wit! He hasn't done it! And YOU haven't
shown that causing animals to exist provides them a
"benefit", because it CANNOT do so.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Animal Rescue Workers Stay With Animals Cat Protector Cat health & behaviour 0 September 24th 05 02:05 AM
How to block annoying posts Hailey Cat health & behaviour 0 August 13th 05 02:19 AM
PETA caught illegally dumping dead animals Steve Crane Cat health & behaviour 4 June 19th 05 08:35 PM
Friend in Oshkosh Wisconsin needs help! Batson Cat health & behaviour 10 May 26th 04 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.