If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to
disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. How much more is this administration going to deliberately hurt the lower and middle classes of this country???!!!!! -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
CatNipped wrote:
The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. Where did you hear this? AFAIK, Employers have always had the ability to choose what plan to purchase for their employees and the benefits allowable are purely up to the insurance policy as written. I was never aware of any mandated coverage "law" for mammograms or routine exams for anyone. (You might recall I'm a licensed agent in life, AD&D and health.) Prior to the introduction of HMO's and PPO's, the primary policies purchased by Employers were Comprehensive Major Medical and most did not cover the cost of routine exams. Again, depending on the policy language, mammograms were only covered if the attending physician determined there was a need for one, rather than simply an annual "preventive" mammogram. Jill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
I just emailed my senator giving him a piece of my mind, I urge you all to
do the same. -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ "CatNipped" wrote in message ... The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. How much more is this administration going to deliberately hurt the lower and middle classes of this country???!!!!! -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"jmcquown" wrote in message
... CatNipped wrote: The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. Where did you hear this? AFAIK, Employers have always had the ability to choose what plan to purchase for their employees and the benefits allowable are purely up to the insurance policy as written. I was never aware of any mandated coverage "law" for mammograms or routine exams for anyone. (You might recall I'm a licensed agent in life, AD&D and health.) Prior to the introduction of HMO's and PPO's, the primary policies purchased by Employers were Comprehensive Major Medical and most did not cover the cost of routine exams. Again, depending on the policy language, mammograms were only covered if the attending physician determined there was a need for one, rather than simply an annual "preventive" mammogram. Jill I heard it on Good Morning America this morning. Right now "standard coverage" includes all tests or recommended doctor visits. This bill will allow insurance companies to remove *ANY* mammograms or routine doctor visits for children from coverage. Before this employers could choose to not cover elective procedures, but had to cover standard procedures. Hugs, CatNipped |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"CatNipped" wrote in message ... The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. How much more is this administration going to deliberately hurt the lower and middle classes of this country???!!!!! That is very short sighted. I lost some friends to breast cancers. Many among them detected the cancer early but still lost the battles. Imagine if mammogram is not covered by insurance, many who need it may not go for it. It is more costly to treat cancer at a later stage. These days I don't even need a doctor's requisiton to go for a mammogram as I am in a provincial breast screening program. They sent me a reminder to go for a mammogram every year or two. Of course it was paid by the provincial health insurance. I don't have any family history of breast cancer. My only risk factor is my age. Winnie -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
.. (You
might recall I'm a licensed agent in life, AD&D and health.) Please enlighten me...I read that statement that you are a licenced agent in life, Advanced Dungeons and Dragons (tm) and health! Lesley Slave of the Fabulous Furballs |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"CatNipped" wrote in message ... The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. How much more is this administration going to deliberately hurt the lower and middle classes of this country???!!!!! -- They also want to include a mandory routine AIDS test with physicals. I think that's unfair practice because then future insurance companies can deny a person coverage. Speaking as an uninsured, unemployed person who is going in for a mammogram on Thursday, I can tell you how difficult it was to find a clinic who will even see me. They're taking me on a sliding scale based upon how much money my husband makes. After the mammogram, though, I have no idea how I'm going to financially face treatment. I may not do anything and just let nature take its course. If I was a single, unemployed person with children, I would be eligible for Medicaid, but as a married woman under 40, I am not. I am so disgruntled with the way the government is being run and I don't see it changing for the better. kili |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"Lesley" wrote in message
oups.com... . (You might recall I'm a licensed agent in life, AD&D and health.) Please enlighten me...I read that statement that you are a licenced agent in life, Advanced Dungeons and Dragons (tm) and health! Lesley Slave of the Fabulous Furballs LOL! It stands for Accidental Death and Disability I believe. -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"Lesley" wrote in message oups.com... . (You might recall I'm a licensed agent in life, AD&D and health.) Please enlighten me...I read that statement that you are a licenced agent in life, Advanced Dungeons and Dragons (tm) and health! Lesley Slave of the Fabulous Furballs Hey don't knock that game ;-) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [OT]
"W. Leong" wrote in message
.. . "CatNipped" wrote in message ... The senate is considering a bill that would allow insurance companies to disallow coverage of mammograms and routine exams for children. Employers could choose to go with the cheaper plan with less coverage. How much more is this administration going to deliberately hurt the lower and middle classes of this country???!!!!! That is very short sighted. I lost some friends to breast cancers. Many among them Yes, very short-sighted, but not without precedence. They won't pay for birth control even though pregnancy is more expensive to treat, they won't pay for weight control even though heart attacks, strokes, and other results of overweight are more expensive to treat, and they won't pay for smoking cessation aids even though lung cancer, heart disease, strokes, emphazema and other smoking-related diseases are more expensive to treat. It's not unusual to have a co-pay of $300 or more per month for family coverage - and if you don't pay that you may end up with hundreds of thousands of dollars of medical bills instead. But paying $300 or more per month for family coverage - how will most families squeeze out the extra bucks for mammograms and pediatric health monitoring???! -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ detected the cancer early but still lost the battles. Imagine if mammogram is not covered by insurance, many who need it may not go for it. It is more costly to treat cancer at a later stage. These days I don't even need a doctor's requisiton to go for a mammogram as I am in a provincial breast screening program. They sent me a reminder to go for a mammogram every year or two. Of course it was paid by the provincial health insurance. I don't have any family history of breast cancer. My only risk factor is my age. Winnie -- Hugs, CatNipped See all my masters at: http://www.PossiblePlaces.com/CatNipped/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AKK! I'm Melting! [OT] | Catnipped | Cat anecdotes | 27 | June 14th 05 04:05 AM |
[OT] Anne Bancroft, R.I.P. | Jeanne Hedge | Cat anecdotes | 4 | June 9th 05 05:21 PM |
[OT] A fire next door | Karen | Cat anecdotes | 6 | June 5th 05 03:30 AM |
[OT] plumbing grumbles | John F. Eldredge | Cat anecdotes | 9 | June 3rd 05 10:54 PM |
[OT] Arrgghhh! Flipping insurance companies | Monique Y. Mudama | Cat anecdotes | 3 | June 3rd 05 03:40 PM |