A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat health & behaviour
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Liz's Food recommendations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #311  
Old October 12th 03, 10:22 PM
Cheryl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In ,
GAUBSTER2 composed with style:

You ARE a jerk. I suppose there are worst adjectives I could use,
but I'll just stick w/ that. You've proven it time and time again.


WTF do I care what you think of me? Hmm? You opinion about
everything I've seen is crap.

I've refrained from labeling you so far because I'm trying to
exercise restraint rather than a knee-jerk reaction which you
"ladies" here a term used quite loosely can't seem to do.

No, you haven't refrained from anything. Why do you think this
continues not only with me but everyone else that you've butted heads
with? You're an obnoxious asshole and you seem to think the ideas
you've leached from some other people are fact and should hold true in
every situation.



  #316  
Old October 13th 03, 03:54 AM
Jon C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The point is that's not true. Steve is saying that ALS foods are
re-labelled kitten foods.

If Science Diet called their kitten foods All Life Stages, which they
certainly can, would it make you feel better?

"Karen M." wrote in message
...
Once again, comparing "all stages" to "kitten" food. While an ALS food
will be formulated to *meet* growth needs *and* accomodate maintenance,
a specifically *kitten* food will be formulated specifically for
*kittens*, and therefore contain higher protein. Once again, they are
*not* the same. So keep waiting for that apology. I stand by what I
stated previously.

Steve Crane wrote:

(Karen M.) wrote in message

. com...

(Steve Crane) wrote in message

. com...


No, it is *not*. Go back and read the information in your *own* post,
and re-read my reply. You obviously aren't reading it correctly. And
regardless of this entire argument,




Karen, here are the original numbers posted.
As you can see the Science Diet products are indeed lower in carbs.
I'll accept you apology anytime for not reading the numbers correctly.
Clearly the Felidae and Wellness products are HIGHER carbs than
equivalent Science Diet products and thus contain more of that dreaded
evil grain.

Felidae Dry: protein 32.0%, fat 20.0%, fiber 2.5%,
moisture 9.0%, ash 5.5% Total 69% 100-69 = 31% carbohydrates

Wellness Dry: Protein 33.0%, fat 19.0%, fiber 5.0%, Moisture 10.0%,
Ash 6.0% Total 73% 100-73 = 27% carbohydrates

Science Diet Feline Kitten Protein 33%, fat 23%, fiber 3%, moisture
10%, ash 7% Total = 76% thus this food is 24% carbs.

Science Diet Nature's Best Feline Kitten Protein 35%, fat 22%, fiber
2%, moisture 10%, ash 6% Total = 75% thus this food is 25% carbs.




  #317  
Old October 13th 03, 03:54 AM
Jon C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The point is that's not true. Steve is saying that ALS foods are
re-labelled kitten foods.

If Science Diet called their kitten foods All Life Stages, which they
certainly can, would it make you feel better?

"Karen M." wrote in message
...
Once again, comparing "all stages" to "kitten" food. While an ALS food
will be formulated to *meet* growth needs *and* accomodate maintenance,
a specifically *kitten* food will be formulated specifically for
*kittens*, and therefore contain higher protein. Once again, they are
*not* the same. So keep waiting for that apology. I stand by what I
stated previously.

Steve Crane wrote:

(Karen M.) wrote in message

. com...

(Steve Crane) wrote in message

. com...


No, it is *not*. Go back and read the information in your *own* post,
and re-read my reply. You obviously aren't reading it correctly. And
regardless of this entire argument,




Karen, here are the original numbers posted.
As you can see the Science Diet products are indeed lower in carbs.
I'll accept you apology anytime for not reading the numbers correctly.
Clearly the Felidae and Wellness products are HIGHER carbs than
equivalent Science Diet products and thus contain more of that dreaded
evil grain.

Felidae Dry: protein 32.0%, fat 20.0%, fiber 2.5%,
moisture 9.0%, ash 5.5% Total 69% 100-69 = 31% carbohydrates

Wellness Dry: Protein 33.0%, fat 19.0%, fiber 5.0%, Moisture 10.0%,
Ash 6.0% Total 73% 100-73 = 27% carbohydrates

Science Diet Feline Kitten Protein 33%, fat 23%, fiber 3%, moisture
10%, ash 7% Total = 76% thus this food is 24% carbs.

Science Diet Nature's Best Feline Kitten Protein 35%, fat 22%, fiber
2%, moisture 10%, ash 6% Total = 75% thus this food is 25% carbs.




  #320  
Old October 13th 03, 04:00 AM
Jon C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Karen M." wrote in message
...
Go wank yourself. There's obviously a *big* difference of opinion here,
I don't consider "all life stages" to be kitten food, *exclusively*
kitten foods have more protein, therefore they are not comparable.
Period. Now, go back and re-read my first sentence.


Funny that the Felidae and Wellness have more protein than the Science Diet
then, right?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Before commercial cat food..... Kitten M Cat health & behaviour 716 October 18th 03 02:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.