![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:51:33 -0700, "Jofirey"
wrote: "CatNipped" wrote in message ... It seems that one week after receiving $85 *BILLION* dollars of bail-out money from our tax dollars, the senior executives at AIG took a week-long company-paid vacation at an exclusive resort in CA to the tune of half a million bucks! It was talked about on Oprah today. Apparently it was 70 employees and they ran up a bill of $400,000 for a week long retreat with $500 a night rooms. Tried to claim it was 'different money' than the bail out money they received. Even Oprah who knows how to spend money was pretty sarcastic about how a good herbal wrap sure solves the worlds problems. Jo It is different money. AIG is a conglomerate of insurance companies in the property, casualty and life insurance businesses. The company that got into trouble was a bond insurer. A default by the bond insurer would have brought the issue of bonds to a grinding halt and you would have had even more banks fail. By law the premiums for one line of insurance may not be used to pay losses or operating expenses for another line of insurance. The boys still wanted their reward for their part of the business that did well, although it would have been more politic to lay low for a while. This is too much to explain in a 30 second news segment. A lot of what you hear on television is just plain silly, like the statement that GM didn't sell cars in Japan because they didn't make cars with the driver's side on the right. What the heck did those reporters think GM has been selling in the UK all these years. Another fact that astounds reporters is that so much medical care is done in the last year of life. I guess they haven't discovered that sad fact of the human condition: we sicken before we die. Bud |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jofirey wrote: "CatNipped" wrote in message ... It seems that one week after receiving $85 *BILLION* dollars of bail-out money from our tax dollars, the senior executives at AIG took a week-long company-paid vacation at an exclusive resort in CA to the tune of half a million bucks! It was talked about on Oprah today. Apparently it was 70 employees and they ran up a bill of $400,000 for a week long retreat with $500 a night rooms. Tried to claim it was 'different money' than the bail out money they received. Even Oprah who knows how to spend money was pretty sarcastic about how a good herbal wrap sure solves the worlds problems. Jo "Different money" or not, if they could afford to spend that much for having fun, why did they need the bailout? (Show of hands - those of us here who can afford $500 a night for hotel rooms at a posh spa when we go on vacation!) |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo I assumed "manage" was just another word for "coordinate" - with several different neighbors involved, that didn't strike me as being particularly odd. (Wonder what modern-day taxing authorities would make of an old-fashioned "barn raising"?) |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo I assumed "manage" was just another word for "coordinate" - with several different neighbors involved, that didn't strike me as being particularly odd. (Wonder what modern-day taxing authorities would make of an old-fashioned "barn raising"?) Depends of whether or not anyone owes anyone anything else once the barn is raised. Note, they take a very dim view of landlords that have tenants improve the property in lieu of rent payments. Of course they are very unlikely to find out about it, unless they are doing an audit and the landlord (my client at the time) won't shut up about it because she is so sure its such a lovely thing to be able to do. A tax preparer really hates to hear about all this mid audit. Jo |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, manage just meant keeping track of who was where and doing what. No
big deal, my husband was the one doing it. The barn raising would alert the builders union, the electrical union (if you had to have electricity for milking cows or such) and the plumbers union if you had running water. I understand these people need jobs but, the result of stopping the Barter was, that none of these things got done. We quietly caulked windows for those who couldn't and when a family decided to insulate and put siding on their house, we all showed up to help. A man had to sell his two horses as he could no longer trade work for the hay and so on and such...... "Jofirey" wrote in message news ![]() "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo I assumed "manage" was just another word for "coordinate" - with several different neighbors involved, that didn't strike me as being particularly odd. (Wonder what modern-day taxing authorities would make of an old-fashioned "barn raising"?) Depends of whether or not anyone owes anyone anything else once the barn is raised. Note, they take a very dim view of landlords that have tenants improve the property in lieu of rent payments. Of course they are very unlikely to find out about it, unless they are doing an audit and the landlord (my client at the time) won't shut up about it because she is so sure its such a lovely thing to be able to do. A tax preparer really hates to hear about all this mid audit. Jo |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:27:01 -0700, Jofirey wrote:
"EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo I assumed "manage" was just another word for "coordinate" - with several different neighbors involved, that didn't strike me as being particularly odd. (Wonder what modern-day taxing authorities would make of an old-fashioned "barn raising"?) Depends of whether or not anyone owes anyone anything else once the barn is raised. Note, they take a very dim view of landlords that have tenants improve the property in lieu of rent payments. Of course they are very unlikely to find out about it, unless they are doing an audit and the landlord (my client at the time) won't shut up about it because she is so sure its such a lovely thing to be able to do. A tax preparer really hates to hear about all this mid audit. Jo My father lived in a rented house for the last 25 years of his life. He had such a "basic maintenance in exchange for reduced rent" arrangement with the succession of landlords (first one large corporation, then another large corporation, and finally the city park board, who ended up as the landowner for a large tract of land including his house). I suspect the main issue with the tax auditors is whether or not the payment-in-kind is declared as income by the landowner. -- John F. Eldredge -- PGP key available from http://pgp.mit.edu "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know about all that tax stuff but for example, the man who painted
their house got so many bales of hay they harvested for doing the job. Nothing we ever did was counted as income or outgo. We were helping each other. With the way things are now, people may have to return to some of this in order to survive. "John F. Eldredge" wrote in message ... On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:27:01 -0700, Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Jofirey wrote: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" wrote in message m... Granby wrote: In our case we were doing things, home repair, painting and such that got the attention of union type people. Several older people needed houses painted and, for an exchange of farm products, it was done but, someone knocked on the door of the man who was managing it and he was told that it could not be allowed. So much for the concept of simply being "good neighbors"! Sorry but when it reaches the level of needing someone to manage it, its no longer just good neighbors'. Jo I assumed "manage" was just another word for "coordinate" - with several different neighbors involved, that didn't strike me as being particularly odd. (Wonder what modern-day taxing authorities would make of an old-fashioned "barn raising"?) Depends of whether or not anyone owes anyone anything else once the barn is raised. Note, they take a very dim view of landlords that have tenants improve the property in lieu of rent payments. Of course they are very unlikely to find out about it, unless they are doing an audit and the landlord (my client at the time) won't shut up about it because she is so sure its such a lovely thing to be able to do. A tax preparer really hates to hear about all this mid audit. Jo My father lived in a rented house for the last 25 years of his life. He had such a "basic maintenance in exchange for reduced rent" arrangement with the succession of landlords (first one large corporation, then another large corporation, and finally the city park board, who ended up as the landowner for a large tract of land including his house). I suspect the main issue with the tax auditors is whether or not the payment-in-kind is declared as income by the landowner. -- John F. Eldredge -- PGP key available from http://pgp.mit.edu "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|