The things you come across on Usenet (cats)

On 8 Jul, 18:07, sheelagh wrote:
On 8 Jul, 17:34, "Matthew" wrote:

Here we go again another newbie starts a thread. Someone says keep your
cats in or out and this BS debate of inside or out starts again. And all of
you jump on the band wagon it is getting pretty pathetic that you all do
this. And now with the cross posting it gets even worse.

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point you
will never change it. People here have a different view point you will
never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as past
threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all ended up
acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

You all ended up

acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

A bunch of tosser's Matthew;o)
Sheelagh

actually that should be ******* not tosser's, the former is the plural
form of the singular 'tosser' and the other is talking about something
or someone who belongs to a tosser or that the tosser is doing ie the
tosser's going on about cats again, or the tosser's pants are on fire.
lots of people get the position of the apostrophe incorrect and end up
writing something completely different from what they meant to write.
bit like the there/their/they're thing which i explained before when
get them mixed up all the time

personally for this scenario i would choose the term '******s' '****s'
'a-holes' or 'prats', maybe even 'plonkers', they are all
interchangeable

bookie

On 8 Jul, 19:48, "chalk" wrote:
"Matthew" wrote in message

...

Here we go again another newbie starts a thread. Someone says keep your
cats in or out and this BS debate of inside or out starts again. And all
of you jump on the band wagon it is getting pretty pathetic that you all
do this. And now with the cross posting it gets even worse.

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point
you will never change it. People here have a different view point you
will never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as
past threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all ended
up acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

Free, Open, and Robust discussion is the basis of a free society.
Why do you think the neo-liberal fascists want to shut down talk
radio in the United States?

Global warming My Ass! More like Junk Science.

nothing wrong with it, just that we ahve all been there with the 'cats
in or out' debate and are all fairly bored of it now. if a new bunch
of people want to go at it while the rest fo us look in, thats fine. i
just think that noone from the last string abot this one shoud be
allowed to post on it, only new people, as the oldies would have an
unfair advantage of experience or something from the last bit of argy-
bargy

On 8 Jul, 20:26, bookie wrote:
On 8 Jul, 18:07, sheelagh wrote:





On 8 Jul, 17:34, "Matthew" wrote:

Here we go again another newbie starts a thread. Someone says keep your
cats in or out and this BS debate of inside or out starts again. And all of
you jump on the band wagon it is getting pretty pathetic that you all do
this. And now with the cross posting it gets even worse.

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point you
will never change it. People here have a different view point you will
never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as past
threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all ended up
acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

You all ended up

acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

A bunch of tosser's Matthew;o)
Sheelagh

actually that should be ******* not tosser's, the former is the plural
form of the singular 'tosser' and the other is talking about something
or someone who belongs to a tosser or that the tosser is doing ie the
tosser's going on about cats again, or the tosser's pants are on fire.
lots of people get the position of the apostrophe incorrect and end up
writing something completely different from what they meant to write.
bit like the there/their/they're thing which i explained before when
get them mixed up all the time

personally for this scenario i would choose the term '******s' '****s'
'a-holes' or 'prats', maybe even 'plonkers', they are all
interchangeable

bookie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

oh ******** i meant to reply only to sheelagh not the whole group,
what an idiot.

now for all those who are unfamiliar with the term 'plomker' then that
is what i am being right now.

sorry

it 's been a long day

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:20:42 -0700, bookie wrote:

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point
you will never change it. People here have a different view point you
will never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as
past threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all
ended up acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

i didn't say a word about that! just about putting collars on cats,
which i am opposed to fro several reasons, but i am sure someone will
argue against me about it.
i can't be arsed with getting into that tedious debate again; I am never
going to change your mind and you are never to change mine no matter
much we rant on, so we have to agree to disagree.

Bookie, you goddamn liar, you posted about this less than 8 hours ago...

"keeping them captive indoors is against their nature you dumbo"

Message-ID: . com

You are an outdoor cat militant. I only hope your cats don't have to pay
the ultimate price for your wrong-headed view of this subject.

Charlie

On 8 Jul, 20:53, Charlie Wilkes
wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:20:42 -0700, bookie wrote:
Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point
you will never change it. People here have a different view point you
will never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as
past threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all
ended up acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.

i didn't say a word about that! just about putting collars on cats,
which i am opposed to fro several reasons, but i am sure someone will
argue against me about it.
i can't be arsed with getting into that tedious debate again; I am never
going to change your mind and you are never to change mine no matter
much we rant on, so we have to agree to disagree.

Bookie, you goddamn liar, you posted about this less than 8 hours ago...

"keeping them captive indoors is against their nature you dumbo"

Message-ID: . com

You are an outdoor cat militant. I only hope your cats don't have to pay
the ultimate price for your wrong-headed view of this subject.

Charlie

you m,ake it sound like I make them live outdoors with no access to
the indoors, totally incorrect, i just give them the choice and I
leave the back door open whenever i am in.mostly they stay indoors
where the soft cushions and the food is, sometimes they go to sunbathe
outside and to check out their territory (our tiny back garden) but i
like to give them the choice.
i would rather they were able to go outside and exoperience a bit of
nature than go stir crazy indoors.

Professor used his keyboard to write :
"Ivor Jones" wrote in message
...
"Professor" wrote in message
news:MrPji.102$CJ4.84@trndny08
"Ivor Jones" wrote in message
...
"Baldoni @googlemail.com" baldoniXXVnil wrote in
message
I would never let any of my cats wear a collar.
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/control-pet-cats/
Saying that the people in the UK are watched and spied
upon by Govt agencies, who knows what is next. Camera's in trees !

What a load of crap. Cats are wild animals, here in the
UK they have the right to roam where they please, long
may it remain so.

You never let us forget that you like having cats run
over by cars. In British-ese they refer to guys like you
as a bit "thick", right?

Who said I like cats run over by cars..? I've had cats all my life (I'm 52)
and none of them have ever been run over, hit or otherwise injured as a
result of being outdoors. It all depends where you live.

What I *don't* like is keeping a naturally outdoor animal a prisoner. But
we've had this "discussion" before.

Ivor

I.E. Yes, you are a bit thick. Thousands of cats are killed on England's
motorways yearly, but you don't seem to give a toss. I can't fathom how
keeping cats safe indoors is somehow against their better interests. Does
dementia run in your family?

I have never seen a cat on a motorway in my life, and I have spent a
lot of time driving on them.

They are too damn noisy for one thing.

--
Count Baldoni

"chalk" wrote in message
...

"Matthew" wrote in message
...
Here we go again another newbie starts a thread. Someone says keep your
cats in or out and this BS debate of inside or out starts again. And all
of you jump on the band wagon it is getting pretty pathetic that you all
do this. And now with the cross posting it gets even worse.

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point
you will never change it. People here have a different view point you
will never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as
past threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all ended
up acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.


Free, Open, and Robust discussion is the basis of a free society.
Why do you think the neo-liberal fascists want to shut down talk
radio in the United States?

Global warming My Ass! More like Junk Science.



Someone needs their meds refilled

"Mr Tanaka" wrote in message
ps.com...
On Jul 8, 5:17 pm, "Matthew" wrote:
"sheelagh"

Specially Barry

what's that Matt? lmao
dude, you don't even have a leg to stand on

would be a big shame getting caught cruising wouldn't it?
what about Marcie next door, I heard she's got a little kit with WHIPS
in it

just put the safari hat away, go find something good on the tube,
Paris Trout, (Dennis Hopper) is sexually abusing a brunette on cable
tv. The movie takes place back in the sweaty days.


Dude you must be on some good stuff to come up with that bunch of mumble
jumble

Nobody 'started it'. Someone half-inched a thread from uk.rec.gardening!

(and Sheelagh, "*******" doesn't have an apostrophe!)

--
AnneJ

If you don't quit, and don't cheat, and don't run home
when trouble arrives, you can only win.
~Shelley Long- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL.
I thought being the plural, they would?
But then again, I haven't been reading or writing for that long, so
you are probably correct, & I am wrong. You live and learn as they
say!!
sorry!
Sheelagh )

Never. This is a new perversion of the language. You see a lot of that
lately along with confusing then with than, your with you're, The apostrophe
denotes possession or a contraction.

Stacey

"Matthew" wrote in message
...

"chalk" wrote in message
...

"Matthew" wrote in message
...
Here we go again another newbie starts a thread. Someone says keep
your cats in or out and this BS debate of inside or out starts again.
And all of you jump on the band wagon it is getting pretty pathetic
that you all do this. And now with the cross posting it gets even
worse.

Would you all get over it People over seas have a different view point
you will never change it. People here have a different view point you
will never change it. You can't debate or even discuss it rational as
past threads and this one have proven time and time again. You all
ended up acting like how do the British say it a bunch of *******.


Free, Open, and Robust discussion is the basis of a free society.
Why do you think the neo-liberal fascists want to shut down talk
radio in the United States?

Global warming My Ass! More like Junk Science.



Someone needs their meds refilled



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA