If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
writes I found Lusksat post really annoying and inflammatory to those who let their cats out. This subject is a parallel to a music newsgroup post asking whether it was The Beatles, Elvis or The Rolling Stones who were the greatest. In other words.....this topic has been discussed, analyzed and brought back for as long as this newsgroup existed. It's not a new subject and no new ground has been broken. Those in the UK feel it's ok to let a cat wander about. Those in the US..experts...the majority of pet people, etc..feel is it best to keep the cat inside. Frankly, there have been a high number of posts from people who mourned a pet who died outside from: a car..poisons..wild animals..dogs..and a significant number of posts from those who lost cats (outside cats never returned home) It's isn't real helpful to harangue and condemn someone for letting a cat out who's brokenhearted over just losing it. Which you do constantly. It always makes me wonder if you don't honestly think the mourning cat owner in question is *already* feeling guilty and bad enough and hasn't "learned their lesson." Sherry |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message ... "Mary" wrote in message om... " Not nearly as tiresome as your sarcasm. Do you mean to tell me that you live in Chapel Hill and let your cats roam? Rest assured that cats were not "designed" to live outside in the modern urban world. I'm sorry Mary, but I nearly wrote a post along the same lines as Steve. No need to apologize for your opinions. I notice that Steve did not answer my question, meaning of course that Steve, who does indeed live in Chapel Hill (near where I live) allows his cats to roam. Well, they're his cats, but, once again, I don't want to hear about it when one of them gets hit by a car, ripped open by a dog, or poisoned by an insane neighbor. I found Lusksat post really annoying and inflammatory to those who let their cats out. If this was a US/Canadian moderated forum especially for indoor cats then I would understand the response and accept that , but this is an unmodertated cat newsgroup for anybody and everybody regardless. Sorry, I don't recall the post you're talking about. We all feel strongly about certain subjects and want to push those ideas and in an unmoderated newsgroup there's bound to be insults and sarcasm . If Luskats and anyone writes posts like that then there are bound to be answers like Steve's. That's newsgroups for you Whatever. Steve lives in the US in an urban area. That's what worries me. Of course people should be warned of the dangers and encouraged to keep their cat in or limit its time outside, if it is necessary. Anyone who has to be warned that allowing their cats to roam means opening them up to ANYTHING that comes their way are truly and irrevokably stupid. You love them or you don't. You keep them safe or you don't. It's your choice. But I DON'T want to hear about it when "Missy got hit by a car!" "Muffy has a dog bite!" etc. What really upsets me is seeing posts on forums from people who react to their cats natural behaviour like scratching and jumping on surfaces by shouting at them , spraying them with water and/or vinegar, throwing things at them , picking them up and shaking them, hissing in their faces tapping their noses, using shock/IV collars on them and matter of factly talking about disciplining them and finding these methods totally acceptable without even bothering to find or use kinder and better ways. So let's see. It's okay to allow them out and unprotected, but not to yell at them. Interesting. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message ... "Mary" wrote in message om... " Not nearly as tiresome as your sarcasm. Do you mean to tell me that you live in Chapel Hill and let your cats roam? Rest assured that cats were not "designed" to live outside in the modern urban world. I'm sorry Mary, but I nearly wrote a post along the same lines as Steve. No need to apologize for your opinions. I notice that Steve did not answer my question, meaning of course that Steve, who does indeed live in Chapel Hill (near where I live) allows his cats to roam. Well, they're his cats, but, once again, I don't want to hear about it when one of them gets hit by a car, ripped open by a dog, or poisoned by an insane neighbor. I found Lusksat post really annoying and inflammatory to those who let their cats out. If this was a US/Canadian moderated forum especially for indoor cats then I would understand the response and accept that , but this is an unmodertated cat newsgroup for anybody and everybody regardless. Sorry, I don't recall the post you're talking about. We all feel strongly about certain subjects and want to push those ideas and in an unmoderated newsgroup there's bound to be insults and sarcasm . If Luskats and anyone writes posts like that then there are bound to be answers like Steve's. That's newsgroups for you Whatever. Steve lives in the US in an urban area. That's what worries me. Of course people should be warned of the dangers and encouraged to keep their cat in or limit its time outside, if it is necessary. Anyone who has to be warned that allowing their cats to roam means opening them up to ANYTHING that comes their way are truly and irrevokably stupid. You love them or you don't. You keep them safe or you don't. It's your choice. But I DON'T want to hear about it when "Missy got hit by a car!" "Muffy has a dog bite!" etc. What really upsets me is seeing posts on forums from people who react to their cats natural behaviour like scratching and jumping on surfaces by shouting at them , spraying them with water and/or vinegar, throwing things at them , picking them up and shaking them, hissing in their faces tapping their noses, using shock/IV collars on them and matter of factly talking about disciplining them and finding these methods totally acceptable without even bothering to find or use kinder and better ways. So let's see. It's okay to allow them out and unprotected, but not to yell at them. Interesting. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message
... "Phil P." wrote in message ... Statistics can be made to prove anything. Do you have any statistics to prove that ? LOL! ROTFL , What's that saying about statistics and damn lies? Alison I think you mean this one, attributed to Benjamin Disraeli.... "There are three kinds of lies - lies, damned lies and statistics." Jeannie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/04 |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message
... "Phil P." wrote in message ... Statistics can be made to prove anything. Do you have any statistics to prove that ? LOL! ROTFL , What's that saying about statistics and damn lies? Alison I think you mean this one, attributed to Benjamin Disraeli.... "There are three kinds of lies - lies, damned lies and statistics." Jeannie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/04 |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message ... "Mary" wrote in message om... Here we go again with this old chestnut.....Whether you do or do not let your cat out is not a situation where the "one size fits all" rule applies. In my opinion, if you live in a city...it's probably best to keep the cat inside, if one of your cats has already been killed by coyotes...probably not such a good idea to let another cat roam, if you live somewhere more rural, assess the dangers and make a decision based on your own situation. Jeannie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/04 |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
"Alison" wrote in message ... "Mary" wrote in message om... Here we go again with this old chestnut.....Whether you do or do not let your cat out is not a situation where the "one size fits all" rule applies. In my opinion, if you live in a city...it's probably best to keep the cat inside, if one of your cats has already been killed by coyotes...probably not such a good idea to let another cat roam, if you live somewhere more rural, assess the dangers and make a decision based on your own situation. Jeannie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/04 |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
"GAUBSTER2" wrote in message
... From: "Jeannie" The statistics show that an indoor cat lives much longer than an outdoor one because of the dangers of living outdoors. Well, no they don't, Well, yes they do. 98% of all statistics are made up :-) Statistics can be made to prove anything. That's why you need to look at "peer published research"! Don't be so cynical. 87.5% of peer published researchers are cynics..so... Jeannie --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 22/07/04 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Real Life gets in the way | Tanada | Cat anecdotes | 54 | November 1st 04 06:41 PM |