If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
True? Prince William shot and killed a cat belonging to someone on Balmoral
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_925133.html
Wills accused of shooting cat Prince William has been investigated by police after a woman claimed he shot her pet cat. Jeshiera Art filed a complaint saying Wills, 21, fired a gun outside her home near Balmoral - and her cat has not been seen since, reports The Sun. Police decided to take no action so Jeshiera, 34, is threatening to take out a private prosecution against William. She said: "It had gone 11 when there was this huge bang. There was a lamp shining on my house and one at my cat. Then there were a couple of shots." Buckingham Palace confirmed Wills had been on a rabbit shoot near Balmoral, but denied a cat was shot. Is this true? Seems to terrible and terrible it is only reported in the obscure news services. If true, he should be arrested. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Tree Line at
wrote on 4/19/04 7:50 AM: http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_925133.html Wills accused of shooting cat Prince William has been investigated by police after a woman claimed he shot her pet cat. Jeshiera Art filed a complaint saying Wills, 21, fired a gun outside her home near Balmoral - and her cat has not been seen since, reports The Sun. Police decided to take no action so Jeshiera, 34, is threatening to take out a private prosecution against William. She said: "It had gone 11 when there was this huge bang. There was a lamp shining on my house and one at my cat. Then there were a couple of shots." Buckingham Palace confirmed Wills had been on a rabbit shoot near Balmoral, but denied a cat was shot. Is this true? Seems to terrible and terrible it is only reported in the obscure news services. If true, he should be arrested. I don't see how she could do anything unless she finds the cat. Karen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't
have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make that kind of accusation. But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits at (what sounds like) very close to her house. Sherry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't
have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make that kind of accusation. But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits at (what sounds like) very close to her house. Sherry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be
threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. "Sherry " wrote in message ... : That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't : have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make : that kind of accusation. : : But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits : at (what sounds like) very close to her house. : : : Sherry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be
threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. "Sherry " wrote in message ... : That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't : have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make : that kind of accusation. : : But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits : at (what sounds like) very close to her house. : : : Sherry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be
threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. Walllll....I'm telling ya, Pilgrim, NOBODY shoots *anything* close enough to my house to spotlight my cats. Nobody. Not even Dubbya himself. And on second thought, what kind of fun is tramping through pastures at night shooting a defenseless animal? Killing for the *sheer* sake of killing. Not for food, not even for trophy, which is bad enough. I'd seriously wonder about what's in the heart of someone who enjoys that. Sherry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be
threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. Walllll....I'm telling ya, Pilgrim, NOBODY shoots *anything* close enough to my house to spotlight my cats. Nobody. Not even Dubbya himself. And on second thought, what kind of fun is tramping through pastures at night shooting a defenseless animal? Killing for the *sheer* sake of killing. Not for food, not even for trophy, which is bad enough. I'd seriously wonder about what's in the heart of someone who enjoys that. Sherry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Question is what's in the *heads*, not the hearts, Sherry. That family has a
rep, deserved or not, of let's just say not being real bright due to inbreeding over centuries. Their collective i.q.'s would probably make, comparatively, what's running our country look like Einstein. Also, those princes don't really have very much to do; they don't work as we know it. We really don't have anything like them in the USA; even our rock stars have to give a concert now and then, and Bill Gates, our richest, puts on his pants and goes somewhere every day, even if he doesn't lift a finger physically. But showing up at some charity event is as hard as it ever gets for the royals, in spite of the silly pics you see with one of them holding a shovel full of dirt somewhere.....we just can't imagine such a life. Anyone's pet would be expendable and not worth a discussion to such beings. "Sherry " wrote in message ... : R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be : threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those : royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences : to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. : : Walllll....I'm telling ya, Pilgrim, NOBODY shoots *anything* close enough to my : house to spotlight my cats. Nobody. Not even Dubbya himself. : And on second thought, what kind of fun is tramping through pastures at night : shooting a defenseless animal? Killing for the *sheer* sake of killing. Not for : food, not even for trophy, which is bad enough. I'd seriously wonder about : what's in the heart of someone who enjoys that. : : Sherry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|