If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Question is what's in the *heads*, not the hearts, Sherry. That family has a
rep, deserved or not, of let's just say not being real bright due to inbreeding over centuries. Their collective i.q.'s would probably make, comparatively, what's running our country look like Einstein. Also, those princes don't really have very much to do; they don't work as we know it. We really don't have anything like them in the USA; even our rock stars have to give a concert now and then, and Bill Gates, our richest, puts on his pants and goes somewhere every day, even if he doesn't lift a finger physically. But showing up at some charity event is as hard as it ever gets for the royals, in spite of the silly pics you see with one of them holding a shovel full of dirt somewhere.....we just can't imagine such a life. Anyone's pet would be expendable and not worth a discussion to such beings. "Sherry " wrote in message ... : R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be : threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those : royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences : to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. : : Walllll....I'm telling ya, Pilgrim, NOBODY shoots *anything* close enough to my : house to spotlight my cats. Nobody. Not even Dubbya himself. : And on second thought, what kind of fun is tramping through pastures at night : shooting a defenseless animal? Killing for the *sheer* sake of killing. Not for : food, not even for trophy, which is bad enough. I'd seriously wonder about : what's in the heart of someone who enjoys that. : : Sherry |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, true. But one thing in favor of this type of report is the fact
that Aunt (whatshername, Charles older sister) has a dog that has been in the paper a couple times for attacking when unprovoked. I have nothing at all against tempermental dogs, I have my Mutt who will bite. But I don't take her out in the public and let her run loose either because of that exact reason. So true or not, the Royal family does have previous animal issues behind them. I doubt he shot a cat too. He's going to be King of England someday (although I strongly suspect the title is on it's last two or three generations) and I don't think he'd attempt something so stupid or heartless. No matter how he feels about animals. I'm no Diana fanatic, but I do believe she was too caring of a person to raise a child that way. Grace "Sherry " wrote in message ... That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make that kind of accusation. But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits at (what sounds like) very close to her house. Sherry |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, true. But one thing in favor of this type of report is the fact
that Aunt (whatshername, Charles older sister) has a dog that has been in the paper a couple times for attacking when unprovoked. I have nothing at all against tempermental dogs, I have my Mutt who will bite. But I don't take her out in the public and let her run loose either because of that exact reason. So true or not, the Royal family does have previous animal issues behind them. I doubt he shot a cat too. He's going to be King of England someday (although I strongly suspect the title is on it's last two or three generations) and I don't think he'd attempt something so stupid or heartless. No matter how he feels about animals. I'm no Diana fanatic, but I do believe she was too caring of a person to raise a child that way. Grace "Sherry " wrote in message ... That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story doesn't have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough to make that kind of accusation. But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at rabbits at (what sounds like) very close to her house. Sherry |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Gracie, I didn't mean the dude was raised that way. If you're a few
sandwiches short of a picnic, who knows what's fun to you.....to quote that Robert Palmer epic, "A pretty face....don't mean no pretty heart....." (Bad Case of Lovin'You). (snicker). "GraceCat" wrote in message ... : Yes, true. But one thing in favor of this type of report is the fact : that Aunt (whatshername, Charles older sister) has a dog that has been : in the paper a couple times for attacking when unprovoked. I have : nothing at all against tempermental dogs, I have my Mutt who will bite. : But I don't take her out in the public and let her run loose either : because of that exact reason. So true or not, the Royal family does have : previous animal issues behind them. : : I doubt he shot a cat too. He's going to be King of England someday : (although I strongly suspect the title is on it's last two or three : generations) and I don't think he'd attempt something so stupid or : heartless. No matter how he feels about animals. I'm no Diana fanatic, : but I do believe she was too caring of a person to raise a child that : way. : : Grace : : "Sherry " wrote in message : ... : That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story : doesn't : have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough : to make : that kind of accusation. : : But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at : rabbits : at (what sounds like) very close to her house. : : : Sherry : : |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Gracie, I didn't mean the dude was raised that way. If you're a few
sandwiches short of a picnic, who knows what's fun to you.....to quote that Robert Palmer epic, "A pretty face....don't mean no pretty heart....." (Bad Case of Lovin'You). (snicker). "GraceCat" wrote in message ... : Yes, true. But one thing in favor of this type of report is the fact : that Aunt (whatshername, Charles older sister) has a dog that has been : in the paper a couple times for attacking when unprovoked. I have : nothing at all against tempermental dogs, I have my Mutt who will bite. : But I don't take her out in the public and let her run loose either : because of that exact reason. So true or not, the Royal family does have : previous animal issues behind them. : : I doubt he shot a cat too. He's going to be King of England someday : (although I strongly suspect the title is on it's last two or three : generations) and I don't think he'd attempt something so stupid or : heartless. No matter how he feels about animals. I'm no Diana fanatic, : but I do believe she was too caring of a person to raise a child that : way. : : Grace : : "Sherry " wrote in message : ... : That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story : doesn't : have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough : to make : that kind of accusation. : : But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at : rabbits : at (what sounds like) very close to her house. : : : Sherry : : |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Gracie, I didn't mean the dude was raised that way.
Well, yeah, but isn't their Pop an avid fox hunter? So they've been so to speak, raised thinking it's "normal" to kill defenseless animals. Sherry |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Gracie, I didn't mean the dude was raised that way.
Well, yeah, but isn't their Pop an avid fox hunter? So they've been so to speak, raised thinking it's "normal" to kill defenseless animals. Sherry |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Hopitus2 wrote in message ... R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. Not true, Princess Anne recently became the first Royal for ages to get a criminal conviction because she let her dog run riot in a public area and attack someone. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Hopitus2 wrote in message ... R U kidding, Sherry? We don't live in a monarchy so that *would* be threatening behavior here in USA. But I've always got the impression those royals do whatever, wherever, whenever they want......with no consequences to their exalted hides. Whole different ballpark than here. Not true, Princess Anne recently became the first Royal for ages to get a criminal conviction because she let her dog run riot in a public area and attack someone. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Oh I know Hops!! I wasn't insinuating you at all... Truth be, I didn't read
all of the msgs and I don't recall what most of anybody has said. (rude I know, got a buttkicking cold right now so....) This was an unbiased and un.... what's that word for umm.. rubbing off on someone/prompted... comment And you are absolutely right though, the Monarchy does put forth a great image today (to us USA'ers) but centuries are telling and the fact is, there are some mighty big skeletons in that closet. I think... I don't know... *bleh* I didn't think colds and stuff was supposed to be contagious. Grace "Hopitus2" wrote in message ... Gracie, I didn't mean the dude was raised that way. If you're a few sandwiches short of a picnic, who knows what's fun to you.....to quote that Robert Palmer epic, "A pretty face....don't mean no pretty heart....." (Bad Case of Lovin'You). (snicker). "GraceCat" wrote in message ... : Yes, true. But one thing in favor of this type of report is the fact : that Aunt (whatshername, Charles older sister) has a dog that has been : in the paper a couple times for attacking when unprovoked. I have : nothing at all against tempermental dogs, I have my Mutt who will bite. : But I don't take her out in the public and let her run loose either : because of that exact reason. So true or not, the Royal family does have : previous animal issues behind them. : : I doubt he shot a cat too. He's going to be King of England someday : (although I strongly suspect the title is on it's last two or three : generations) and I don't think he'd attempt something so stupid or : heartless. No matter how he feels about animals. I'm no Diana fanatic, : but I do believe she was too caring of a person to raise a child that : way. : : Grace : : "Sherry " wrote in message : ... : That sounds a little flaky & coincidental. I realize that brief story : doesn't : have all the details, but it doesn't sound to me that she saw enough : to make : that kind of accusation. : : But I am surprised that anyone is allowed to romp & stomp and shoot at : rabbits : at (what sounds like) very close to her house. : : : Sherry : : |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|