If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RWatchtower (Jehovah's Witnesses) to BAN PUSSIES for Cult-members?e: H
What a lot of nonsense! The JWs are known to twist scripture.
| Can one deny that the chance exists | that the same grave consequences could visit your home that fell upon John? Don't know of *any* such case. | Clearly, God disapproved of this 'birthday' party. Should we not then | disapprove (without showing any malicious intent, for Godly hatred of every | last part of the wicked system of things is a manifestation of our | obedience to Jehovah) of cats the way the scriptures recommend? It's the wickedness of the *human heart* the bible refers to!! | Throughout history, particularly in the middle ages and reaching its climax | in the Salem Witch trials of the 1600s, cats were recognized by the forces | of Christendom as carriers - if not direct incarnatations - of demons. | While, in common with most beliefs of the empire of false religion, no | evidence has ever been found to support this, the symbolism of cats still | remain. If it was a false religion as you say, why then should we carry on believing this nonsense? No! Now we know better and do not support those wrong beliefs about cats! | The careful student of the Bible will acknowledge that nowhere within it is | any species ('kind') of cat referred to in favorable terms. Dogs are not mentioned either, and canaries and guinea pigs and giraffes and zebras, monkeys and, and ... | While the animal itself may be unaware of | this, it serves only its true master - Satan, the devil. No it serves killing mice.... | The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, | faithful Job, the Apostles, Jesus, Charles Russell nor any other human | bearing God's favor himself owned a cat. .... and therefore it was so clear that cats were about that there's no need to mention it. | Should we simply assume that this | is a mere coincidence? No, surely not! This was the case because these | individuals did not want to be like the heathen contemporaries of their | respective days who showed no regard for how God feels about owning a cat. No! What they did instead: they didn't *worship* the cats. | Additionally, cats practice many unclean habits not befitting a Christian | household: coughing up fur balls, licking inappropriate body areas | (inappropriate handling), urination on the floor, eating dead animals often | with their blood, vocal promiscuity and widespread sexual misconduct | without the benefit or sanctity of matrimony or fidelity, abuse of catnip | (an intoxicant herb), stealing food from the table, and so on. What sort of | example does this give our young ones endeavoring to faithfully serve | Jehovah? And how about dogs? The removal of the cat must therefore be carefully | planned, and a Christian will know he must not give a satanic being to | another person, on penalty of bloodguilt. PLONK!! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What a lot of nonsense! The JWs are known to twist scripture.
| Can one deny that the chance exists | that the same grave consequences could visit your home that fell upon John? Don't know of *any* such case. | Clearly, God disapproved of this 'birthday' party. Should we not then | disapprove (without showing any malicious intent, for Godly hatred of every | last part of the wicked system of things is a manifestation of our | obedience to Jehovah) of cats the way the scriptures recommend? It's the wickedness of the *human heart* the bible refers to!! | Throughout history, particularly in the middle ages and reaching its climax | in the Salem Witch trials of the 1600s, cats were recognized by the forces | of Christendom as carriers - if not direct incarnatations - of demons. | While, in common with most beliefs of the empire of false religion, no | evidence has ever been found to support this, the symbolism of cats still | remain. If it was a false religion as you say, why then should we carry on believing this nonsense? No! Now we know better and do not support those wrong beliefs about cats! | The careful student of the Bible will acknowledge that nowhere within it is | any species ('kind') of cat referred to in favorable terms. Dogs are not mentioned either, and canaries and guinea pigs and giraffes and zebras, monkeys and, and ... | While the animal itself may be unaware of | this, it serves only its true master - Satan, the devil. No it serves killing mice.... | The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, | faithful Job, the Apostles, Jesus, Charles Russell nor any other human | bearing God's favor himself owned a cat. .... and therefore it was so clear that cats were about that there's no need to mention it. | Should we simply assume that this | is a mere coincidence? No, surely not! This was the case because these | individuals did not want to be like the heathen contemporaries of their | respective days who showed no regard for how God feels about owning a cat. No! What they did instead: they didn't *worship* the cats. | Additionally, cats practice many unclean habits not befitting a Christian | household: coughing up fur balls, licking inappropriate body areas | (inappropriate handling), urination on the floor, eating dead animals often | with their blood, vocal promiscuity and widespread sexual misconduct | without the benefit or sanctity of matrimony or fidelity, abuse of catnip | (an intoxicant herb), stealing food from the table, and so on. What sort of | example does this give our young ones endeavoring to faithfully serve | Jehovah? And how about dogs? The removal of the cat must therefore be carefully | planned, and a Christian will know he must not give a satanic being to | another person, on penalty of bloodguilt. PLONK!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|