Bush and his cronies to wipe out all endangered species...

In ,
being of bellicose mind posted:
Who voted for these a$$holes?

Gaubster for one (like that's a surprise. He makes Bush look like a
rocket scientist.)
I am so angry after reading this article I could scream. Their
justification for this is totally retarded. The article did say
that we're in the public comment period until the 17th. Does
anyone know specifics on how and where to comment?

Megan

Have you ever noticed that none of the animals "we" classify as a
harvestable food source is "endangered?" That's because "we" breed
them and monitor their numbers so that their numbers will never be
hunted into extinction.
--

~~Philip "Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"

In news:%F7ib.26841$La.19723@fed1read02,
Shawn & Michelle being of bellicose mind posted:
Here's a link to a less biased account of the story, which has
nothing to do with President Bush, but with the Federal Fish and
Wildlife Service. You have to watch for outright lies from any
story originating from the Washington Post and/or the LA Times (and
many others). It's only a handful of species that are being
considered, and it is to supposedly encourage third world countries
where these animals are treated poorly to adopt better conservation
programs.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/10/11/end...ies/index.html

Agreed. The NY Times, The LA Times, The Chicago Tribune, the San
Fransico Chronicle, and ALL the newspapers who get their news feed
and articles from these papers are very suspect these days as all of
them are politically LEFT of center to a considerable degree.

As to the vulgar comment as to who votes for whom, I would hope
there would be more than one issue that voters consider. And that
they'd check their sources. I'd hate to think that we are a nation
of simpletons.

Think it because, it's true. Don't stay in denial. These are the
people the Democrats appeal to.
--

~~Philip "Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"

In news:%F7ib.26841$La.19723@fed1read02,
Shawn & Michelle being of bellicose mind posted:
Here's a link to a less biased account of the story, which has
nothing to do with President Bush, but with the Federal Fish and
Wildlife Service. You have to watch for outright lies from any
story originating from the Washington Post and/or the LA Times (and
many others). It's only a handful of species that are being
considered, and it is to supposedly encourage third world countries
where these animals are treated poorly to adopt better conservation
programs.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/10/11/end...ies/index.html

Agreed. The NY Times, The LA Times, The Chicago Tribune, the San
Fransico Chronicle, and ALL the newspapers who get their news feed
and articles from these papers are very suspect these days as all of
them are politically LEFT of center to a considerable degree.

As to the vulgar comment as to who votes for whom, I would hope
there would be more than one issue that voters consider. And that
they'd check their sources. I'd hate to think that we are a nation
of simpletons.

Think it because, it's true. Don't stay in denial. These are the
people the Democrats appeal to.
--

~~Philip "Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"

Nothing to worry about really. It´s not that simple. There´s an
international agency of which the USA is a member that regulates the
trade of endangered species. Every species that leaves the country
*must* have documentation of precedence (a hunter cannot go and get
one in the wild). For example, if the pandas in some Chinese zoo has
offspring and this zoo does not wish to keep them, this zoo can sell
them to other zoos around the world. These animals *cannot* be taken
from their wild habitats. This trade is highly regulated by all
members and most countries in the world are members.

http://www.cites.org/

Nothing to worry about really. It´s not that simple. There´s an
international agency of which the USA is a member that regulates the
trade of endangered species. Every species that leaves the country
*must* have documentation of precedence (a hunter cannot go and get
one in the wild). For example, if the pandas in some Chinese zoo has
offspring and this zoo does not wish to keep them, this zoo can sell
them to other zoos around the world. These animals *cannot* be taken
from their wild habitats. This trade is highly regulated by all
members and most countries in the world are members.

http://www.cites.org/

From:
Date: 10/12/03 12:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

Who voted for these a$$holes?

Gaubster for one (like that's a surprise. He makes Bush look like a
rocket scientist.)

Megan, you don't even know me, so why make a comment like that? Did I ever say
I voted for Bush? Hmm? Please "link" where I said that? You are such a
shrill. Another knee-jerk reaction from you. Figures. Why you must act so
immature is something I'll probably never figure out.

From:
Date: 10/12/03 12:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

Who voted for these a$$holes?

Gaubster for one (like that's a surprise. He makes Bush look like a
rocket scientist.)

Megan, you don't even know me, so why make a comment like that? Did I ever say
I voted for Bush? Hmm? Please "link" where I said that? You are such a
shrill. Another knee-jerk reaction from you. Figures. Why you must act so
immature is something I'll probably never figure out.

"Philip ®" wrote:

Agreed. The NY Times, The LA Times, The Chicago Tribune, the San
Fransico Chronicle, and ALL the newspapers who get their news feed
and articles from these papers are very suspect these days as all of
them are politically LEFT of center to a considerable degree.


It seems that revealing the truth will be branded as left of center
these days by some.

-mhd

"Philip ®" wrote:

Agreed. The NY Times, The LA Times, The Chicago Tribune, the San
Fransico Chronicle, and ALL the newspapers who get their news feed
and articles from these papers are very suspect these days as all of
them are politically LEFT of center to a considerable degree.


It seems that revealing the truth will be branded as left of center
these days by some.

-mhd

In news
being of bellicose mind posted:
"Philip ®" wrote:

Agreed. The NY Times, The LA Times, The Chicago Tribune, the San
Fransico Chronicle, and ALL the newspapers who get their news
feed and articles from these papers are very suspect these days
as all of them are politically LEFT of center to a considerable
degree.


It seems that revealing the truth will be branded as left of center
these days by some.

-mhd

Sensationalism (yellow journalism) from sources that prefer BEING the
news instead of reporting the news appeals to those who have
underdeveloped critical thinking skills and difficulty with
discernment.
--

~~Philip "Never let school interfere
with your education - Mark Twain"