If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:01:51 -0700, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote: P. Cox wrote: The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Of course you are devastated, but perhaps you should stop and think of what the cat would choose, if he could speak? You may remember I had to make a similar decision last summer, when my Patches was put to sleep. He had developed a skin cancer (I'm told white cats - especially outdoor cats - are prone to such, as are fair-skinned humans). I have never believed in putting an animal through the horrors of chemotherapy, etc. (I don't REALLY believe in putting humans through it, either, but they are at least able to weigh the factors and choose for themselves.) Fortunately I was spared that decision, because he developed an apparent respiratory infection which didn't respond to antibiotics, the assumption was that the cancer had metasticized, and euthanasia was really the only option (other than letting hinm suffer until he died of "natural causes"). It's not just a matter of the expense - I know most of us are perfectly willing to spend whatever is necessary to keep our cats healthy, whether we can "afford" it or not. But if the ultimate prognosis is poor, and the animal is being subjected to uncomfortable treatments that may or may not work (and without being able to understand WHY it is being made to suffer)..... It's a difficult decison, and I suspect we all feel guilty when we make it, but animals accept death much more readily than humans do - it is, after all, a natural part of existence, and they don't carry all the intellectual baggage about it that we do. Purrs and prayers for you and Crackles, whatever you decide to do. (I'm sure you know that you have the support of all of us, most of whom have outlived one or more of our furry companions.) You are so right. I remind myself occasionally that we cannot save them all. Crackers cancer is so close to the brain that the prognosis probably is poor. I hope he is not allowed to suffer. On the other hand, think of what that thousand dollars could do for other needy kitties. We all grieve for those we lost, but life goes on. Purrs for all those needing comfort. MLB |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:01:51 -0700, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote: P. Cox wrote: The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Of course you are devastated, but perhaps you should stop and think of what the cat would choose, if he could speak? You may remember I had to make a similar decision last summer, when my Patches was put to sleep. He had developed a skin cancer (I'm told white cats - especially outdoor cats - are prone to such, as are fair-skinned humans). I have never believed in putting an animal through the horrors of chemotherapy, etc. (I don't REALLY believe in putting humans through it, either, but they are at least able to weigh the factors and choose for themselves.) Fortunately I was spared that decision, because he developed an apparent respiratory infection which didn't respond to antibiotics, the assumption was that the cancer had metasticized, and euthanasia was really the only option (other than letting hinm suffer until he died of "natural causes"). It's not just a matter of the expense - I know most of us are perfectly willing to spend whatever is necessary to keep our cats healthy, whether we can "afford" it or not. But if the ultimate prognosis is poor, and the animal is being subjected to uncomfortable treatments that may or may not work (and without being able to understand WHY it is being made to suffer)..... It's a difficult decison, and I suspect we all feel guilty when we make it, but animals accept death much more readily than humans do - it is, after all, a natural part of existence, and they don't carry all the intellectual baggage about it that we do. Purrs and prayers for you and Crackles, whatever you decide to do. (I'm sure you know that you have the support of all of us, most of whom have outlived one or more of our furry companions.) You are so right. I remind myself occasionally that we cannot save them all. Crackers cancer is so close to the brain that the prognosis probably is poor. I hope he is not allowed to suffer. On the other hand, think of what that thousand dollars could do for other needy kitties. We all grieve for those we lost, but life goes on. Purrs for all those needing comfort. MLB |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:01:51 -0700, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"
wrote: P. Cox wrote: The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Of course you are devastated, but perhaps you should stop and think of what the cat would choose, if he could speak? You may remember I had to make a similar decision last summer, when my Patches was put to sleep. He had developed a skin cancer (I'm told white cats - especially outdoor cats - are prone to such, as are fair-skinned humans). I have never believed in putting an animal through the horrors of chemotherapy, etc. (I don't REALLY believe in putting humans through it, either, but they are at least able to weigh the factors and choose for themselves.) Fortunately I was spared that decision, because he developed an apparent respiratory infection which didn't respond to antibiotics, the assumption was that the cancer had metasticized, and euthanasia was really the only option (other than letting hinm suffer until he died of "natural causes"). It's not just a matter of the expense - I know most of us are perfectly willing to spend whatever is necessary to keep our cats healthy, whether we can "afford" it or not. But if the ultimate prognosis is poor, and the animal is being subjected to uncomfortable treatments that may or may not work (and without being able to understand WHY it is being made to suffer)..... It's a difficult decison, and I suspect we all feel guilty when we make it, but animals accept death much more readily than humans do - it is, after all, a natural part of existence, and they don't carry all the intellectual baggage about it that we do. Purrs and prayers for you and Crackles, whatever you decide to do. (I'm sure you know that you have the support of all of us, most of whom have outlived one or more of our furry companions.) You are so right. I remind myself occasionally that we cannot save them all. Crackers cancer is so close to the brain that the prognosis probably is poor. I hope he is not allowed to suffer. On the other hand, think of what that thousand dollars could do for other needy kitties. We all grieve for those we lost, but life goes on. Purrs for all those needing comfort. MLB |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
P. Cox wrote in message ... The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Entirely understandable. I'm so sorry you got bad news back. It's so hard to balance the lives of the animals we love with other legitimate demands on our time and finances. Give Crackles lots of love. Melissa |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
P. Cox wrote in message ... The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Entirely understandable. I'm so sorry you got bad news back. It's so hard to balance the lives of the animals we love with other legitimate demands on our time and finances. Give Crackles lots of love. Melissa |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
P. Cox wrote in message ... The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Entirely understandable. I'm so sorry you got bad news back. It's so hard to balance the lives of the animals we love with other legitimate demands on our time and finances. Give Crackles lots of love. Melissa |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"P. Cox" wrote in message
... The results of Crackles biopsy has came back and he has cancer. He has only one option which is a very expensive surgery on his ear and only if it hasn't spread to his lungs. An xray would determine if its gone to the lungs. The operation would have to be done by a specialist and I was told would be $1000 and would have to be done very soon. I didn't get to talk to the main vet that did the biopsy operation but one of the vets that fills in for her so I don't know what his chaces are if he has the surgery. Ok I gotta stop writting now I am crying again. Da*n! Awful news. Pain-relieving purrs on the way for Crackles and comforting purrs for you to help you through this terrible time. Sam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Crackles update | P. Cox | Cat anecdotes | 25 | July 15th 04 09:08 AM |
Crackles update for those not on Yahoo | Steve Touchstone | Cat anecdotes | 8 | July 10th 04 02:22 AM |