If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
You are a sick person to think it was funny. I found it disgusting. Anyone
who thinks it is hilarious only says that they support animal cruelty and those who do it. Is anyone else getting that weird deja-moo feeling? Sherry |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
This wasn't the first time they've stooped this low.... http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_819254.html An advert for a self-proclaimed 'evil' car featuring a pigeon-bashing bonnet has been slammed by animal charities. The advert shows a pigeon about to swoop down from a tree to deposit its load on a newly-polished Ford Sportka. As it gets close to the car the bonnet springs up, strikes the bird and catapults it across the road to its death. Pigeon fanciers have been quick to condemn the advert, which appears on the Ford UK website. Brian Tattersall, president of the Royal Pigeon Racing Association, has called for the advert to be banned. "It is in incredibly bad taste," he said. "The pigeon finishes up dead in the middle of the road - it's black humour which we don't find amusing. "We have written to the Advertising Standards Agency and to Ford UK and are hoping for an apology." The RSPCA has also joined the battle to ban the advert, claiming that the use of shock tactics to cause offence and gain publicity is just "very, very bad taste." Spokeswoman Katy Geary said: "There surely must be better ways of describing a car's capabilities than this. "It's about time that these companies stop these shock tactics, start acting responsibly and think carefully about the messages they are giving out." A spokeswoman for Ford said that the advert was aimed at young men and was intended to be humorous. "We do take the public's concerns very seriously but we believe that people will understand that we would not hurt an animal in the making of an advert. "The car is most certainly not designed to hurt animals." |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
This wasn't the first time they've stooped this low.... http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_819254.html An advert for a self-proclaimed 'evil' car featuring a pigeon-bashing bonnet has been slammed by animal charities. The advert shows a pigeon about to swoop down from a tree to deposit its load on a newly-polished Ford Sportka. As it gets close to the car the bonnet springs up, strikes the bird and catapults it across the road to its death. Pigeon fanciers have been quick to condemn the advert, which appears on the Ford UK website. Brian Tattersall, president of the Royal Pigeon Racing Association, has called for the advert to be banned. "It is in incredibly bad taste," he said. "The pigeon finishes up dead in the middle of the road - it's black humour which we don't find amusing. "We have written to the Advertising Standards Agency and to Ford UK and are hoping for an apology." The RSPCA has also joined the battle to ban the advert, claiming that the use of shock tactics to cause offence and gain publicity is just "very, very bad taste." Spokeswoman Katy Geary said: "There surely must be better ways of describing a car's capabilities than this. "It's about time that these companies stop these shock tactics, start acting responsibly and think carefully about the messages they are giving out." A spokeswoman for Ford said that the advert was aimed at young men and was intended to be humorous. "We do take the public's concerns very seriously but we believe that people will understand that we would not hurt an animal in the making of an advert. "The car is most certainly not designed to hurt animals." |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Priscilla Ballou" wrote in message ... I think they weighed the pros and cons and decided that idiots who buy on name recognition outweighed the friends of animals. Then there is no reason for a commercial. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Priscilla Ballou" wrote in message ... I think they weighed the pros and cons and decided that idiots who buy on name recognition outweighed the friends of animals. Then there is no reason for a commercial. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Cat Protector" wrote in message news:w21hc.59325$ec1.37024@okepread01... You are a sick person to think it was funny. I found it disgusting. Anyone who thinks it is hilarious only says that they support animal cruelty and those who do it. Quit spewing such screwy logic. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Cat Protector" wrote in message news:w21hc.59325$ec1.37024@okepread01... You are a sick person to think it was funny. I found it disgusting. Anyone who thinks it is hilarious only says that they support animal cruelty and those who do it. Quit spewing such screwy logic. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter Ryan? Afraid I am right? It is you that is not logical.
-- Panther TEK: Staying On Top Of All Your Computer Needs! www.members.cox.net/catprotector/panthertek Cat Galaxy: All Cats, All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com "Ryan Robbins" wrote in message ... Quit spewing such screwy logic. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
What's the matter Ryan? Afraid I am right? It is you that is not logical.
-- Panther TEK: Staying On Top Of All Your Computer Needs! www.members.cox.net/catprotector/panthertek Cat Galaxy: All Cats, All The Time! www.catgalaxymedia.com "Ryan Robbins" wrote in message ... Quit spewing such screwy logic. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Cat Protector" wrote in message news:w21hc.59325$ec1.37024@okepread01... You are a sick person to think it was funny. I found it disgusting. Anyone who thinks it is hilarious only says that they support animal cruelty and those who do it. -- I think this is being blow way out of proportion. If you think about this logically, I would have thought that it would be pretty difficult to actually decapitate a cat using a sun roof. I don't doubt that some lunatic might try, but I'm sure that if a person is that way inclined, they would also be equally able to think up any number of gruesome activities all on their own. What's more concerning to me is the suggestion from some, that things should be censored or banned because they MIGHT influence SOMEONE to do SOMETHING. Now that IS offensive. Big Brother anyone.. It's an advert, it's make-believe, it's not real!. If you don't like it, engage brain, don't watch it, (especially if your only watching it just to be offended) and don't buy a SportKa. Simple really Jeannie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adopted stray cat problems (continued) | Calvin Rice | Cat health & behaviour | 12 | July 12th 03 04:26 PM |