To The Group

writes
It is clear, though, from your defensive response.."

Actually, no. There has never been a time in the decade I've been on AOL and
the newsgroups - this or other 'groups - that there hasn't been accusations
that someone has posted under other nicknames or someone is hiding behind a
phoney email address..etc.

wrote in message ...
Cheryl wrote:

Curious how you must be getting so
much **** on Usenet that you have to
have alias's for your cats. That dear, does
speak volumes about you. I'm finished
replying to you now, you're just too angry
and unbalanced for me to waste anymore
time reading.

Unbalanced is an understatement. I don't believe for a minute that Mary
has posted since '96 , especially since she doesn't even know who SLK
is. Her claim is bull****, which is typical of her, and the fact that
when put on the spot she couldn't even come up with a username she
posted with in the past speaks volumes. She also has a history of using
not one, not two, but *three* different personalities to defend/talk to
herself. She got busted in the genealogy group awhile back for two of
them:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...%40comcast.net

She also slipped up and didn't cover her tracks which gave her away on
the third addy, which was . Somebody caught that one
too and commented that it was interesting that she took criticism of
"Rhodes" so personally.

You have to be a pretty sick person to troll, and do it in a genealogy
newsgroup no less. *And* pretend to be three different people at the
same time. Sad.

Megan

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.

-L.

wrote in message ...
Cheryl wrote:

Curious how you must be getting so
much **** on Usenet that you have to
have alias's for your cats. That dear, does
speak volumes about you. I'm finished
replying to you now, you're just too angry
and unbalanced for me to waste anymore
time reading.

Unbalanced is an understatement. I don't believe for a minute that Mary
has posted since '96 , especially since she doesn't even know who SLK
is. Her claim is bull****, which is typical of her, and the fact that
when put on the spot she couldn't even come up with a username she
posted with in the past speaks volumes. She also has a history of using
not one, not two, but *three* different personalities to defend/talk to
herself. She got busted in the genealogy group awhile back for two of
them:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...%40comcast.net

She also slipped up and didn't cover her tracks which gave her away on
the third addy, which was . Somebody caught that one
too and commented that it was interesting that she took criticism of
"Rhodes" so personally.

You have to be a pretty sick person to troll, and do it in a genealogy
newsgroup no less. *And* pretend to be three different people at the
same time. Sad.

Megan

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.

-L.

In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav",
(-L. artfully composed this message within
. com on 03 Jul
2004:

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.


There doesn't have to be a payoff. Perhaps it is a way to blow off
steam, so to speak. A woman I worked with for a few years used to
treat her staff like ****, and management wouldn't take it
seriously because she got her work done. I know of her personal
life because she told me some, and a few others knew about her
emotionally-abusive husband, and her toddler who literally ran her
life. She'd come to work and "control" things because she had no
control in her home life. She was a miserable woman. She was fired
a couple of weeks ago when one of her staff got fed up and went to
have a heart-to-heart with the president of the company (who's PC's
he was entrusted to; at the office, his home and his beach house
PCs. They had a relationship that no one really knew about. lol).
There are all sorts of ways to "blow off steam" and maybe Usenet is
the way some do it. Yes, sad.

--
Cheryl

In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav",
(-L. artfully composed this message within
. com on 03 Jul
2004:

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.


There doesn't have to be a payoff. Perhaps it is a way to blow off
steam, so to speak. A woman I worked with for a few years used to
treat her staff like ****, and management wouldn't take it
seriously because she got her work done. I know of her personal
life because she told me some, and a few others knew about her
emotionally-abusive husband, and her toddler who literally ran her
life. She'd come to work and "control" things because she had no
control in her home life. She was a miserable woman. She was fired
a couple of weeks ago when one of her staff got fed up and went to
have a heart-to-heart with the president of the company (who's PC's
he was entrusted to; at the office, his home and his beach house
PCs. They had a relationship that no one really knew about. lol).
There are all sorts of ways to "blow off steam" and maybe Usenet is
the way some do it. Yes, sad.

--
Cheryl

Cheryl wrote in message ...
In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav",
(-L. artfully composed this message within
. com on 03 Jul
2004:

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.



There doesn't have to be a payoff. Perhaps it is a way to blow off
steam, so to speak. A woman I worked with for a few years used to
treat her staff like ****, and management wouldn't take it
seriously because she got her work done. I know of her personal
life because she told me some, and a few others knew about her
emotionally-abusive husband, and her toddler who literally ran her
life. She'd come to work and "control" things because she had no
control in her home life. She was a miserable woman. She was fired
a couple of weeks ago

Good God - did y'all throw a party?

when one of her staff got fed up and went to
have a heart-to-heart with the president of the company (who's PC's
he was entrusted to; at the office, his home and his beach house
PCs. They had a relationship that no one really knew about. lol).
There are all sorts of ways to "blow off steam" and maybe Usenet is
the way some do it. Yes, sad.

But making up aliases and signing people up for porn? That's much
more than blowing off steam. That's borderline psychotic. When the
line between Usenet and RL is crossed, there's something seriously
wrong. I can't imagine getting that worked up about someone that I
had to run off to sign them up for porn. I just laughed thinking
about it, actually.

-L.

Cheryl wrote in message ...
In the fine newsgroup "rec.pets.cats.health+behav",
(-L. artfully composed this message within
. com on 03 Jul
2004:

I seriously don't understand what the payoff is. Other than the
attention, possibly. Sad, indeed.



There doesn't have to be a payoff. Perhaps it is a way to blow off
steam, so to speak. A woman I worked with for a few years used to
treat her staff like ****, and management wouldn't take it
seriously because she got her work done. I know of her personal
life because she told me some, and a few others knew about her
emotionally-abusive husband, and her toddler who literally ran her
life. She'd come to work and "control" things because she had no
control in her home life. She was a miserable woman. She was fired
a couple of weeks ago

Good God - did y'all throw a party?

when one of her staff got fed up and went to
have a heart-to-heart with the president of the company (who's PC's
he was entrusted to; at the office, his home and his beach house
PCs. They had a relationship that no one really knew about. lol).
There are all sorts of ways to "blow off steam" and maybe Usenet is
the way some do it. Yes, sad.

But making up aliases and signing people up for porn? That's much
more than blowing off steam. That's borderline psychotic. When the
line between Usenet and RL is crossed, there's something seriously
wrong. I can't imagine getting that worked up about someone that I
had to run off to sign them up for porn. I just laughed thinking
about it, actually.

-L.