If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
Malcolm wrote: In article , Pat Gardiner writes "©¿©" wrote in message .. . In the meantime the rest of us will just get on with telling the world what's going on, you'll never change that Thank you, whoever you are ;o)) He's a troll, a serial liar and regularly defames people. No wonder you agree with him, as you are all of those, too. Just ignore us all Malcolm. I've given you your rightful credit for telling the world that I was telling the truth when I said that I had given evidence to a Select Committee of the House of Commons about blood test faking by SVS vets during the Swine Fever epidemic. You were really helpful I don't suppose it will impact on your relationship with Maff-Defra, the SVS or the RSPB in the long term. If they are a bit sniffy with you, you can always take some time off to look at that new highland bird. By the time you have found one, DNA'd it and got home. They will all have forgotten all about your intervention and be knee deep in the next crisis. Regards Pat Gardiner www.go-self-sufficient.com -- Malcolm |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:41:18 +0100, "Old Codger"
wrote: Pat Gardiner wrote: "Oh No" wrote in message oups.com... Pat Gardiner wrote: The whole thing needs a thorough investigation, not covering up, merely because Britain has cocked up yet another animal health problem through civil sevice corruption. I do think you should say incompetence rather than corruption. You might even find people round here start agreeing with you. If you make charges of corruption you should actually be able to produce documented evidence of people receiving bribes, or equivalent, that would stand up in court. Otherwise you are yourself open to charges of slander. Unless you have a solicitor's opinion that your evidence is solid, you should reduce your accusations to a level that people can take seriously, otherwise you are merely inviting the sort of treatment you often get round here. No, I said corruption and I meant it. The latest one uncovered is the small slaughterhouse scam, where the SVS "adapted" the EU regulations to ensure the employment of their fellow vets when cheaper non-vets were all that was needed. Evidence for that accusation? Without credible evidence you could be found guilty of libel. I do not think any of the government organisations I have criticised would dare take any action. They have too much to hide. You can't go suing people when hiding your own crimes behind crown immunity. I suspect they realise you are just another crackpot who is best ignored. With the greatest respect (genuine!) much of what most people believe of libel and slander is simply wrong. As one small example, I could not be guilty of slander, my comments are with one exception, when I called the SVS a bunch of crooks, I think, on BBC radio and got invited back as a result, are always in writing - hence potentially libellous - not slanderous. You got that right, even if "potentially" is rather understating it. In practice, of course, it doesn't matter if the wrong term is used, *until* legal action is contemplated. Both terms refer to defamation. However, when it comes to legal action it is important to get the term right. Not only does it prevent the action being summarily thrown out there are also differences in the assumptions made by the court and, to a limited extent, the defences that can be used. I say potentially because in almost every case they are not libellous in the legal sense, and even where they may be a bit sharp, all of the usual defences to libel apply. Do you know what the defences are? Check. Off the top of my head I can think of five and I doubt you could use any of them successfully should you try to sue any of the regulars here for statements they have made about you. Of the statements that I can readily recall, they are either obviously true or they are fair comment resulting from your posts to this group. Conversely, a number of the regulars could sue you, almost certainly successfully, LOL wouldn't stand a chance in hell, or the idiots would have done it. To all of us who call a spade, a spade. Also, one thing you learn in business is that irrespective of the letter of the law, practicality rules. The practical day to day rules of commonsense will always come into play and mitigate against casual defamation actions. Indeed, example above. Charles, there was nothing I could do to make myself popular on uk.business.agriculture. The politburo decided on an all out gang attack. There is no "politburo" and there was no "gang attack", "all out" or otherwise. Yes there was. I am another victim of the spineless bullies. As they/you found out to your cost, my bite is bigger than my bark. I'd like to think that you, an old fart, were just being taken advantage of by the bullies. Who, in case you hadn't noticed are quite content, to let you fight their battles for them, whilst failing to support you in any way, shape or form. You owe the dicks nothing. Condemn them while you can. snip groveling for the benefit of the bullies |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:35:31 +0100, Malcolm
wrote: In article .com, writes Malcolm wrote: In article , Pat Gardiner writes "©¿©" wrote in message .. . In the meantime the rest of us will just get on with telling the world what's going on, you'll never change that Thank you, whoever you are ;o)) He's a troll, a serial liar and regularly defames people. No wonder you agree with him, as you are all of those, too. Just ignore us all Malcolm. I've given you your rightful credit for telling the world that I was telling the truth when I said that I had given evidence to a Select Committee of the House of Commons about blood test faking by SVS vets during the Swine Fever epidemic. You were really helpful Why thank you, Pat, you patronising twerp. By the way, you keep saying that the alleged blood test faking was by "SVS vets", in the plural. Yet in your letter to the Select Committee you state that it was a single vet. Would the Select Committee be pleased to know that you have changed your evidence? I don't suppose it will impact on your relationship with Maff-Defra, the SVS or the RSPB in the long term. No, it won't, you silly little man. I have no relationship with Defra, though I do with Seerad. The only vets I know, or have ever known, are hard-working, decent and honest. My relationship with the RSPB is in exactly the same excellent state that it has been for a great many years. You're a bum. No longer employed by the RSPB as you are untouchable, because you're a fat twerp, who's obsessive stalking has cost you dearly, very dearly. Still, now you're on state benefits, you may lose some weight. If they are a bit sniffy with you, you can always take some time off to look at that new highland bird. They are much more likely to thank me for exposing you for the lying defamer that you are. I've already seen the Scottish Crossbill, thank you. By the time you have found one, DNA'd it and got home. They will all have forgotten all about your intervention and be knee deep in the next crisis. Now you call it my "intervention". A few hours ago you were claiming that the only way I could have seen your letter was to have gone to London, or sent someone else, to look at it at the House of Lords library. Do you finally accept that your claim was wrong? Even though I told you months ago that I received a copy of your letter in the post, you still had to repeat your lying claim again yesterday, didn't you? You sound like a very angry old man. LOL By the way, take note that your lying, trolling, defaming "friend" has just proved how right I was about him by repeating lies and defamation about me. You and he are two of a kind. Why! Because I posted this truth about you lying, stealing others works? So much for the old kill filter huh! Guilty as charged...lol %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%% Malcolm Ogilvie of on the suggestion he copied Konters book. " You are making yourself look foolish. The book on Grebes by Andre Konter that was published in 2001 was entitled 'Grebes of OUR World'. My book, published only this month, is entitled 'Grebes of THE World', and as such is entirely different. The similarity of the front covers is quite coincidental. My book IS the first ever devoted to Grebes. Malcolm Ogilivie." ............................................... KONTER (Andre) - Grebes of our World. Visiting all Species on Five Continents - 2001, 8vo. 187pp. Colour photographs, line drawings. A description of the 22 species of grebes, their natural history, ecology and behaviour. Grebes of the World Malcolm Ogilvie The book starts with an authoritative introduction on the origin, evolution, distribution, physiology and behaviour of grebes, followed by accounts of each of the 22 species Malcolm it looks as though Konter might dispute that statement! Rob "Yes, indeed, what I said was wrong and I apologise to Andre Konter, Malcolm Ogilvie" ................................................ The error I made was in a chatty piece about the actual writing of the book which I posted to a non-birdwatching newsgroup M Ogilvie You clearly and explicitly stated that yours was the first book on the subject, in the full knowledge that the topic had recently been covered very thoroughly in Konter's book. The facts speak for themselves. You are a liar who only had the grace to own up when you had been found out - you even persisted in giving the impression that you were the first to write it *after* I had drawn attention to your untruth. Your apology comes a little late. You do yourself no credit in introducing other, wholly irrelevant matters in order to deflect criticism from your behaviour. Shame on you. Paul |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
©¿© wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:41:18 +0100, "Old Codger" wrote: Off the top of my head I can think of five and I doubt you could use any of them successfully should you try to sue any of the regulars here for statements they have made about you. Of the statements that I can readily recall, they are either obviously true or they are fair comment resulting from your posts to this group. Conversely, a number of the regulars could sue you, almost certainly successfully, LOL wouldn't stand a chance in hell, or the idiots would have done it. To all of us who call a spade, a spade. You snipped the bit that gave the reason why it would be pointless suing, either Pat or you. Just like him you are a troll and have no credibility. With apologies to the good folks in the cats groups who have had to put up with all this rubbish. -- Old Codger e-mail use reply to field What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
Malcolm wrote: In article .com, writes Malcolm wrote: In article , Pat Gardiner writes "©¿©" wrote in message .. . In the meantime the rest of us will just get on with telling the world what's going on, you'll never change that Thank you, whoever you are ;o)) He's a troll, a serial liar and regularly defames people. No wonder you agree with him, as you are all of those, too. Just ignore us all Malcolm. I've given you your rightful credit for telling the world that I was telling the truth when I said that I had given evidence to a Select Committee of the House of Commons about blood test faking by SVS vets during the Swine Fever epidemic. You were really helpful Why thank you, Pat, you patronising twerp. By the way, you keep saying that the alleged blood test faking was by "SVS vets", in the plural. Yet in your letter to the Select Committee you state that it was a single vet. Would the Select Committee be pleased to know that you have changed your evidence? Don't get so upset. I hope your bird books have a higher standard of accuracy that your comments here. Anyway, you give me the chance to explain again. At the time when I gave evidence to the Select Committee, there had been only one blood test faking. After I complained I was visited by a senior official from the SVS, who threatened us and faked up a record of the meeting. I complained to Mr Speaker and he was sent home. An investigation team arrived from Scotland. There was a third faking of the records.You can find the details of this horrendous and worrying series of incidents on my site. Read "Stop the World" http://pages.britishlibrary.net/patg.../stopworld.htm I don't suppose it will impact on your relationship with Maff-Defra, the SVS or the RSPB in the long term. No, it won't, you silly little man. I have no relationship with Defra, though I do with Seerad. The only vets I know, or have ever known, are hard-working, decent and honest. My relationship with the RSPB is in exactly the same excellent state that it has been for a great many years. Don't be so gratuitouslly abusive. People might get the impression you are worried. You are right, it is Seerad and indeed I was getting Scottish Executive letterheads dealing with complaints of criminal offences that were committed by Scottish vets in England. They seem to have trouble understanding their role in Britain stops at the border. If they are a bit sniffy with you, you can always take some time off to look at that new highland bird. They are much more likely to thank me for exposing you for the lying defamer that you are. I've already seen the Scottish Crossbill, thank you. Good for you. That must be a big moment for any twitcher. I wonder they did not name it after you? Wouldn't that have been fun? By the time you have found one, DNA'd it and got home. They will all have forgotten all about your intervention and be knee deep in the next crisis. Now you call it my "intervention". A few hours ago you were claiming that the only way I could have seen your letter was to have gone to London, or sent someone else, to look at it at the House of Lords library. Do you finally accept that your claim was wrong? I have no idea. That was most certainly the position when the incident occured. Maybe the rules of the House were changed in the meantime. Anyway, by whatever means, you got a copy and were able to confirm that part of the story. Thank You! Even though I told you months ago that I received a copy of your letter in the post, you still had to repeat your lying claim again yesterday, didn't you? Yes, well, I don't actually know how you received it and was being a bit discrete in case accidentally any of the rules of the House were broken in its aquisition. I got two separate stories as to why it was not published with the other evidence, so things can go wrong. There probably was a change in the rules and to be honest how you got it, with or without actually visiting the House of Lords, is not material to anything. By the way, take note that your lying, trolling, defaming "friend" has just proved how right I was about him by repeating lies and defamation about me. You and he are two of a kind. I don't even know who he is Malcolm, but perhaps you should be more careful about needlessly upsetting people. Regards Pat Gardiner www.go-self-sufficient.com -- Malcolm |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:34:12 +0100, "Old Codger"
wrote: ©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:41:18 +0100, "Old Codger" wrote: Off the top of my head I can think of five and I doubt you could use any of them successfully should you try to sue any of the regulars here for statements they have made about you. Of the statements that I can readily recall, they are either obviously true or they are fair comment resulting from your posts to this group. Conversely, a number of the regulars could sue you, almost certainly successfully, LOL wouldn't stand a chance in hell, or the idiots would have done it. To all of us who call a spade, a spade. You snipped the bit that gave the reason why it would be pointless suing, either Pat or you. You seem to have forgotten who the victims are, bullies usually do. If there is to be any suing, it should be us doing it. You and your bully boy friends don't have a leg to stand on. Just like him you are a troll and have no credibility. Don't hurt me please. You can be so cruel. With apologies to the good folks in the cats groups who have had to put up with all this rubbish. So snip the cross posts you troll. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:08:40 GMT, "Matthew"
wrote: "©¿©" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:34:12 +0100, "Old Codger" wrote: ©¿© wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:41:18 +0100, "Old Codger" wrote: Off the top of my head I can think of five and I doubt you could use any of them successfully should you try to sue any of the regulars here for statements they have made about you. Of the statements that I can readily recall, they are either obviously true or they are fair comment resulting from your posts to this group. Conversely, a number of the regulars could sue you, almost certainly successfully, LOL wouldn't stand a chance in hell, or the idiots would have done it. To all of us who call a spade, a spade. You snipped the bit that gave the reason why it would be pointless suing, either Pat or you. You seem to have forgotten who the victims are, bullies usually do. If there is to be any suing, it should be us doing it. You and your bully boy friends don't have a leg to stand on. Just like him you are a troll and have no credibility. Don't hurt me please. You can be so cruel. With apologies to the good folks in the cats groups who have had to put up with all this rubbish. So snip the cross posts you troll. why don't you so the cat people won't have to put up with this I don't know how. Ask the old codger, he seems to have all the answers. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
©¿© wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:08:40 GMT, "Matthew" wrote: "©¿©" wrote in message ... So snip the cross posts you troll. why don't you so the cat people won't have to put up with this I don't know how. Ask the old codger, he seems to have all the answers. You really are a liar and a Troll Pete. -- Old Codger e-mail use reply to field What matters in politics is not what happens, but what you can make people believe has happened. [Janet Daley 27/8/2003] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
toxoplasma gondii
You're a ****** for dragging this crap onto the cat newsgroups.
*plonk* "Pat Gardiner" wrote in message ... garbage snipped |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cats and mental illness - brief analysis of the research | Juls | Cat health & behaviour | 10 | November 16th 05 07:45 PM |
BEWARE !...Cat Owners !.. | Bigbazza | Cat anecdotes | 10 | June 24th 05 03:05 PM |
Cat predation studies | Alison | Cat health & behaviour | 48 | February 5th 04 03:17 AM |
Steatitis | S. Gass | Cat health & behaviour | 66 | August 3rd 03 12:54 AM |