If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
If you got the FELV shots then it is possibly a false negative since I have
heard this happen before with it. I've heard that, too. If the cat really is positive, though, I would still keep both of them at this point. If he's had the vaccine, then he has some protection (not total, by any means) and, as you say, he may already be infected at this point. Keep both of them and continue to vaccinate the male as long as he continues to test negative. Keep them as healthy as possible with a stress-free life. Some cats never get sick from FeLV and some do but recover. I think it's best that they are kept together. You're probably right that no one would take either now, under these circumstances. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace "One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
He stated the shelter said the test was negative while the vet says it is
positive. Both run pretty much the same test. As for the money, try telling that to the vet. Sometimes the vets charge just as much for the tests as they do the shots. I take my cats to the clinics because they can get the same thing (shots, etc.) for half the cost. "KellyH" wrote in message news:rzQVc.17668$9d6.15831@attbi_s54... He said the shelter is running a different test, which IS the correct thing to do. The "snap" test can produce a false positive sometimes. There really isn't much money to be made in running a test. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
He stated the shelter said the test was negative while the vet says it is
positive. Both run pretty much the same test. As for the money, try telling that to the vet. Sometimes the vets charge just as much for the tests as they do the shots. I take my cats to the clinics because they can get the same thing (shots, etc.) for half the cost. "KellyH" wrote in message news:rzQVc.17668$9d6.15831@attbi_s54... He said the shelter is running a different test, which IS the correct thing to do. The "snap" test can produce a false positive sometimes. There really isn't much money to be made in running a test. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I would get a second opinion though regarding the FELV test. It's very
possible the shelter is correct and they are negative. I know at the Humane Society they are able to tell as soon as the blood is taken what the results are. They also have vets on staff. I know to save money I prefer to take my cats to the clinics because a lot of vets are outrageous in prices and will even charge for another test just to make money. You are right that some cats never get sick from FELV and even if they have it, they can live long lives with the right treatment. I too think it is best to keep them together and if the original OP is really uneasy then she should take the cat to a different vet and clinic and have them re-tested. "MacCandace" wrote in message I've heard that, too. If the cat really is positive, though, I would still keep both of them at this point. If he's had the vaccine, then he has some protection (not total, by any means) and, as you say, he may already be infected at this point. Keep both of them and continue to vaccinate the male as long as he continues to test negative. Keep them as healthy as possible with a stress-free life. Some cats never get sick from FeLV and some do but recover. I think it's best that they are kept together. You're probably right that no one would take either now, under these circumstances. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace "One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I would get a second opinion though regarding the FELV test. It's very
possible the shelter is correct and they are negative. I know at the Humane Society they are able to tell as soon as the blood is taken what the results are. They also have vets on staff. I know to save money I prefer to take my cats to the clinics because a lot of vets are outrageous in prices and will even charge for another test just to make money. You are right that some cats never get sick from FELV and even if they have it, they can live long lives with the right treatment. I too think it is best to keep them together and if the original OP is really uneasy then she should take the cat to a different vet and clinic and have them re-tested. "MacCandace" wrote in message I've heard that, too. If the cat really is positive, though, I would still keep both of them at this point. If he's had the vaccine, then he has some protection (not total, by any means) and, as you say, he may already be infected at this point. Keep both of them and continue to vaccinate the male as long as he continues to test negative. Keep them as healthy as possible with a stress-free life. Some cats never get sick from FeLV and some do but recover. I think it's best that they are kept together. You're probably right that no one would take either now, under these circumstances. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) See my cats: http://photos.yahoo.com/maccandace "One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human." (Loren Eisely) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Cat Protector" wrote in message
news:H7RVc.123560$sh.101048@fed1read06... He stated the shelter said the test was negative while the vet says it is positive. Both run pretty much the same test. As for the money, try telling that to the vet. Sometimes the vets charge just as much for the tests as they do the shots. I take my cats to the clinics because they can get the same thing (shots, etc.) for half the cost. From the original post: They are indoor cats and have not come in contact with other cats since leaving the shelter so my assumption is that she was infected at the shelter so I contacted them. They want to run their own ELIZA blood test and if that comes back postive then run a IFA test (free of charge). I'm not sure what would happen after that. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Cat Protector" wrote in message
news:H7RVc.123560$sh.101048@fed1read06... He stated the shelter said the test was negative while the vet says it is positive. Both run pretty much the same test. As for the money, try telling that to the vet. Sometimes the vets charge just as much for the tests as they do the shots. I take my cats to the clinics because they can get the same thing (shots, etc.) for half the cost. From the original post: They are indoor cats and have not come in contact with other cats since leaving the shelter so my assumption is that she was infected at the shelter so I contacted them. They want to run their own ELIZA blood test and if that comes back postive then run a IFA test (free of charge). I'm not sure what would happen after that. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net www.kelltek.com Check out www.snittens.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I would get a second opinion though regarding the FELV test. It's very
possible the shelter is correct and they are negative. I know at the Humane Society they are able to tell as soon as the blood is taken what the results are. They also have vets on staff. I know to save money I prefer to take my cats to the clinics because a lot of vets are outrageous in prices and will even charge for another test just to make money. 1. The OP has already said the shelter has offered to do another ELISA test. 2. If positive, the shelter is going to run an IFA test FREE OF CHARGE. To better understand the difference, and differences in reliability, here is a graph taken from http://www.neighborhoodcats.org/info/releasing.htm "For FIV, most veterinarians use the ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay) test, which detects whether FIV antibodies are present in the blood - not whether the virus itself is present. As a result, the test is completely unreliable for cats under six months of age who may have received FIV antibodies from their nursing mother, but may never have been exposed to the actual virus. For adult cats, because of the recent introduction of the FIV vaccine, there is now the possibility a positive test result means a cat has been vaccinated, not infected. For FeLV, again the ELISA test is almost always the initial test used. In contrast to FIV, the FeLV ELISA does not detect antibodies, but whether the antigen of the virus is present in the blood. In other words, a positive test result indicates the presence of the actual FeLV virus in the blood. But, the test is extremely sensitive and is prone to false positives from improper handling. In addition, a cat in the early stages of FeLV infection can still fight it off. The disease does not take permanent hold until it enters the cat's white blood cells, which only another type of test, the IFA test (Immunofluoresence Assay, also known as the Hardy test) can determine. The IFA test must be performed at a lab and is more expensive. Consequently, if a cat appears otherwise healthy, a positive ELISA test should always be confirmed with an IFA test. Only if other severe pathological symptoms of FeLV are present should an initial positive ELISA ever be relied upon alone." |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I would get a second opinion though regarding the FELV test. It's very
possible the shelter is correct and they are negative. I know at the Humane Society they are able to tell as soon as the blood is taken what the results are. They also have vets on staff. I know to save money I prefer to take my cats to the clinics because a lot of vets are outrageous in prices and will even charge for another test just to make money. 1. The OP has already said the shelter has offered to do another ELISA test. 2. If positive, the shelter is going to run an IFA test FREE OF CHARGE. To better understand the difference, and differences in reliability, here is a graph taken from http://www.neighborhoodcats.org/info/releasing.htm "For FIV, most veterinarians use the ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay) test, which detects whether FIV antibodies are present in the blood - not whether the virus itself is present. As a result, the test is completely unreliable for cats under six months of age who may have received FIV antibodies from their nursing mother, but may never have been exposed to the actual virus. For adult cats, because of the recent introduction of the FIV vaccine, there is now the possibility a positive test result means a cat has been vaccinated, not infected. For FeLV, again the ELISA test is almost always the initial test used. In contrast to FIV, the FeLV ELISA does not detect antibodies, but whether the antigen of the virus is present in the blood. In other words, a positive test result indicates the presence of the actual FeLV virus in the blood. But, the test is extremely sensitive and is prone to false positives from improper handling. In addition, a cat in the early stages of FeLV infection can still fight it off. The disease does not take permanent hold until it enters the cat's white blood cells, which only another type of test, the IFA test (Immunofluoresence Assay, also known as the Hardy test) can determine. The IFA test must be performed at a lab and is more expensive. Consequently, if a cat appears otherwise healthy, a positive ELISA test should always be confirmed with an IFA test. Only if other severe pathological symptoms of FeLV are present should an initial positive ELISA ever be relied upon alone." |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
1) Take the shelter up on their offer of IFA--absolutely necessary to verify
Elissa test results--remember, Elissa can test + while cat is fighting off infection... 2) talke a look at http://www.felineleukemia.org join their 'Talk List" & you can get some real concrete advice about this condition... 3) don't seperate them---the little guy's already been exposed--if he is -, make sure he has FELV vaccine... I just found out that my 5 1/2 year old indorr (from rescued outdoor kitten) is +--she is basically asymptomatic "Morac" wrote in message om... 3 weeks ago I adopted two 4-5 month old kittens (male and female from same litter) from an animal shelter. They had already been spayed/neutered and the shelter said that the tests for all 3 deadly cat virus (includ FeLV) came back negative. At the time the cats were sniffling a little, but I was told they were getting over a "cold" (I later learned cats don't get colds and that they were getting a respitory infection but I digress). I took the 2 cats to the vet for a checkup but since they had just gotten shots a short time ago and they were sick I was told to bring them back in two weeks. During the two weeks the female's stools were constantly soft and both were sneezing. The male's sneezing was more violent (often shooting out bloody snot) and more often and he had congestion problems (especially when the AC was on). Today I brought them to the vet and the vet decided to do a blood test even though both cats had previously tested negative. Well the FeLV ELIZA test came back positive on the female, but negative on the male. The vet recommended a retest in a month. Well, the male and female have been sharing food, water and litter boxes since I got them (and probably before that). They have been (playfully) biting each other and sneezing on each other a lot. This means most likely that the male is already infected and will become positive at some point. So now I'm stuck with a problem. The vet officially recommended separating the two in my house, but he and I both agreed that isn't feasible. The alternative is to get rid of one of the cats, but because they've been together so long neither of them could be placed in another house with cats nor could they go back to the shelter (where the positive cat would most likely be killed). Remember both were already sick to begin with. So my question is, what should I do now? Should I give up the positive cat (which might recover) to save the negative cat (which may already be infected) or just stick to the norm and hope things work out? Or is there another solution that I'm not seeing? Any suggestions? P.S. - They are indoor cats and have not come in contact with other cats since leaving the shelter so my assumption is that she was infected at the shelter so I contacted them. They want to run their own ELIZA blood test and if that comes back postive then run a IFA test (free of charge). I'm not sure what would happen after that. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about a vax | Cheryl | Cat health & behaviour | 29 | March 4th 05 02:37 AM |
feed Nutro? | Tamara | Cat health & behaviour | 90 | November 19th 03 01:57 AM |