If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
Time to make sure those vaccinations are all up to date!!
http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbc...NEWS/709010310 Sheelagh"o" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:50:43 -0700, "Sheelagh o"
wrote: Time to make sure those vaccinations are all up to date!! http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbc...NEWS/709010310 Sheelagh"o" Why the HELL aren't incoming animals being PROMPTLY immunized? THis is negligence in their practices. Feline distemper is known to be highly transmissible, with the virus being able to survive for approx. 1-2 *YEARS* in the environment. One sick cat, months ago, could have been responsible for the source of the virus. But by choosing NOT to quickly immunize cats on intake, the facility is directly responsible for the deaths of sick cats, and for the 'deaths' of the innocent, probably non-infected cats they murdered, to try to stem this preventible disease in their facility. IMHO. There is NO EXCUSE for allowing this to happen. Those responsible should be investigated, and fired. IMHO. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
On Sat 01 Sep 2007 09:46:07p, cindys wrote in
rec.pets.cats.health+behav : Why the HELL aren't incoming animals being PROMPTLY immunized? ---------- They may very well be, but I think the vaccination takes a while to work, and it's not going to help a cat who already has the disease. When I boarded my cat this past spring, I did not want him immunized because he is elderly and has renal disease and I felt the risk of complications from the vaccination were greater than the risk of his getting distemper. The director argued with me a little but then let it go. Our veterinarian subsequently explained that even if I had had him vaccinated, he would not have been protected since it takes a while for the cat to build up the antibodies in response to the vaccine. Friends of mine with dogs tell me they have to have them up to date on vacs a month before boarding them if they have to, or they aren't able to board them there. On the problem with the shelters, I've seen a case where they just don't have the correct quarentine spaces, and one litter of kittens wiped out a lot of semi-healthy kittens, and even adult cats, with panleuk. That incident made me quit that rescue group. I couldn't deal with it. I couldn't change it, so I had to step back. I prefer now to help others who have the guts to deal with the heartbreak. I admit I close my eyes to some of it. I just can't........................ -- Cheryl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
On 2 Sep, 04:14, "cindys" wrote:
"Cheryl" wrote in message ... On Sat 01 Sep 2007 09:46:07p, cindys wrote in rec.pets.cats.health+behav : Why the HELL aren't incoming animals being PROMPTLY immunized? ---------- They may very well be, but I think the vaccination takes a while to work, and it's not going to help a cat who already has the disease. When I boarded my cat this past spring, I did not want him immunized because he is elderly and has renal disease and I felt the risk of complications from the vaccination were greater than the risk of his getting distemper. The director argued with me a little but then let it go. Our veterinarian subsequently explained that even if I had had him vaccinated, he would not have been protected since it takes a while for the cat to build up the antibodies in response to the vaccine. Friends of mine with dogs tell me they have to have them up to date on vacs a month before boarding them if they have to, or they aren't able to board them there. -------- It was interesting because the place where we boarded our cat (which is a large veterinary office/hospital where we were clients for 15 years) ostensibly has the policy that all animals which are boarded there must be vaccinated. If an animal is not vaccinated, they will vaccinate it at the time of intake, which is quite useless, as both of us have said. The way the events went down regarding Alex were rather interesting. As I am remembering this... I misspoke (or miswrote) when I said I was unwilling to have him vaccinated. I was actually willing to have him vaccinated (although I wasn't happy with the idea). What I was really objecting to was that I didn't want him to have the $40 medical exam before the vaccination since had already been examined two times in the preceding six months at that facility and once at their sister facility for a second opinion. So, when I phoned in the reservation, I told the secretary that I really didn't want the cat vaccinated but if that were the policy I would go along with it, but I was mostly unwilling to pay $40 for his fourth medical exam in six months. She told me I would have to speak to the director when the time came. When the day arrived, we dropped off the cat, and we had another conversation with the secretary where again we were told that we would need to speak with the director, but the cat was accepted for boarding. Several hours later, the director phoned us at home and told us that the $40 exam was required before they could vaccinate the cat. We said no because our cat had already been examined three times in the preceding six months, twice at that facility and once at the sister facility. Then, he started questioning us about why we had taken the cat to the sister facility. After some discussion on that topic, he finally said "Well...how about the mini-exam?" We said "How much will that cost?" He said "$33." We said no. Then, he got mad and said that if we didn't agree to an exam, he would not vaccinate the cat. We said that was fine by us since we never wanted the cat vaccinated in the first place. Then, he was insisting that he couldn't take responsibility if our cat got distemper. We asked him how could our cat get distemper if all the other cats were vaccinated? He then babbled something about how our cat could pick up other respiratory diseases. We told him we would take our chances. It was obviously just a money-making thing because, as you stated, even if we had gone along with the vaccination, our cat would not have developed the antibodies until a month later, but we would have been out an extra $75 in the meantime ($40 for the exam and $35 for the vaccination). I am happy to report that our cat did not develop distemper or any other respiratory diseases. FTR, we now see a vet at the much smaller, more personal sister facility, and we are much happier. Best regards, ---Cindy S.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Excellent. I am ever so pleased to hear this. when you are boarding your cat, you want to know that your cat is in the best possible situation whilst you are away, so that you have a stress free break. Trying to wring you out for another $75, which is no measely some when you count that together with the prior 3 examinations too. now, that really is a money spinning idea, & the director should have known their facts before launching into conscience - control with you! it's your cat & your decision ultimately, isn't it? I am so glad that you held out in the end. If there was nothing to be gained in the short term, it would have been a total waste of money. as for admitting there was next to no chance that your cat could contract the disease during the cats stay there. Ridiculous really!! Sheelagh "o" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
On 2 Sep, 00:10, (Gandalf) wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:50:43 -0700, "Sheelagh o" wrote: Time to make sure those vaccinations are all up to date!! http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbc...20070901/NEWS/... Sheelagh"o" Why the HELL aren't incoming animals being PROMPTLY immunized? THis is negligence in their practices. Feline distemper is known to be highly transmissible, with the virus being able to survive for approx. 1-2 *YEARS* in the environment. One sick cat, months ago, could have been responsible for the source of the virus. But by choosing NOT to quickly immunize cats on intake, the facility is directly responsible for the deaths of sick cats, and for the 'deaths' of the innocent, probably non-infected cats they murdered, to try to stem this preventable disease in their facility. IMHO. There is NO EXCUSE for allowing this to happen. Those responsible should be investigated, and fired. IMHO. Whilst I agree with you, if it is the case that the injection wouldn't have caught the offending cat/ kitten somewhere along the line, one wonders if there was anything that could have been done to prevent it? I would like to think that all cats were immunized the moment they reached the safety of the door, but if this one cat had the disease up to 6 months ago, is there any point in recriminations? I have a feeling that this should serve as a reminder to all, to insure that if their cats are outdoor cats as well, then they should be immunized the moment that they are old enough to be, unless of course there is a valid reason not to inject of course!? I feel so sorry or the animals that suffered as a consequence of this terrible tragedy. Purrs to them all, shelter staff & cats, & cat slaves alike! It is entirely possible that the scenario that you portray is most probably the cat responsible has affected no end of other cats- who knows? ( Or, to view it from another point, @ least they came clean about it asap! ( then again, who would we know if they didn't?) Sheelagh "o" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
"Sheelagh o" wrote in message ups.com... On 2 Sep, 00:10, (Gandalf) wrote: On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:50:43 -0700, "Sheelagh o" wrote: Time to make sure those vaccinations are all up to date!! http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbc...20070901/NEWS/... Sheelagh"o" Why the HELL aren't incoming animals being PROMPTLY immunized? THis is negligence in their practices. Feline distemper is known to be highly transmissible, with the virus being able to survive for approx. 1-2 *YEARS* in the environment. One sick cat, months ago, could have been responsible for the source of the virus. But by choosing NOT to quickly immunize cats on intake, the facility is directly responsible for the deaths of sick cats, and for the 'deaths' of the innocent, probably non-infected cats they murdered, to try to stem this preventable disease in their facility. IMHO. There is NO EXCUSE for allowing this to happen. Those responsible should be investigated, and fired. IMHO. Whilst I agree with you, if it is the case that the injection wouldn't have caught the offending cat/ kitten somewhere along the line, one wonders if there was anything that could have been done to prevent it? I would like to think that all cats were immunized the moment they reached the safety of the door, but if this one cat had the disease up to 6 months ago, is there any point in recriminations? I have a feeling that this should serve as a reminder to all, to insure that if their cats are outdoor cats as well, then they should be immunized the moment that they are old enough to be, unless of course there is a valid reason not to inject of course!? I feel so sorry or the animals that suffered as a consequence of this terrible tragedy. Purrs to them all, shelter staff & cats, & cat slaves alike! It is entirely possible that the scenario that you portray is most probably the cat responsible has affected no end of other cats- who knows? ( Or, to view it from another point, @ least they came clean about it asap! ( then again, who would we know if they didn't?) Sheelagh "o" Our local animal shelter (not the rescue group with Adopt-a-Thons that I have been discussing in another thread) immunizes all cats and dogs, and they also have a "sick room" where animals are quarantined for awhile before bringing them into the viewing room where the "general population" is kept. This reduces the probability of spreading disease but cannot completely eliminate it. Ironically, it also reduces the number of cats and dogs that can be accepted because that takes more space and personnel. MaryL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
On 2 Sep, 06:39, "cindys" wrote:
"Sheelagh o" wrote in message ps.com... snip Excellent. I am ever so pleased to hear this. when you are boarding your cat, you want to know that your cat is in the best possible situation whilst you are away, so that you have a stress free break. Trying to wring you out for another $75, which is no measely some when you count that together with the prior 3 examinations too. now, that really is a money spinning idea, & the director should have known their facts before launching into conscience - control with you! it's your cat & your decision ultimately, isn't it? I am so glad that you held out in the end. If there was nothing to be gained in the short term, it would have been a total waste of money. as for admitting there was next to no chance that your cat could contract the disease during the cats stay there. Ridiculous really!! ---------- Oh, let me tell you, Sheelagh, when I asked that guy how could my cat get distemper if all the other cats were vaccinated?...he started sputtering and spewing because I caught him completely off-guard, and he really didn't have an answer. But the best part was when he was questioning me about why the cat had been seen at the other facility. We had been clients at his facility for 15 years (as I stated). The vet we had been seeing for most of that time (whom we loved) went to a different practice for reasons she didn't divulge, but after speaking to her, I think she simply didn't like the way he was doing business. She said that the first place was just "too big and too busy." (At any given time, there are at least a dozen veterinarians on staff). So, then, we were lucky enough to find another vet in the same facility whom we also liked a lot. She was our vet for about a year and a half. She was the one who diagnosed Alex's renal disease, but we sought a second opinion (on Phil's advice) because we were questioning some aspects of the treatment plan. The second opinion was from a sister facility (which we didn't know at the time), and we really liked the veterinarian and the fact that it was only a two-person practice. When our vet at the big facility suddenly quit ("for personal reasons"), we were over at the two-person practice almost instantly. Getting the records transferred took quite a bit of effort too. It involved two phone calls and my signing a consent form, and then they transferred only Alex's record (not the other cats' records) and only a few pages of it. We have five cats, two of whom are seniors, and one of whom has a heart murmur, diabetes in remission, and renal dysfunction. Of the younger ones, one of them needed a lot of expensive dental work, and another needed a routine cleaning. Add all of this to annual checkups for five cats, not to mention any other medical needs they find along the way, and this amounts to big bucks flying out the window. The way I finally got the records was that I gave them a choice (it's always good to give people choices): They needed to have ALL the records for ALL five cats photocopied and ready to be transferred to the new practice by the following afternoon. They could either send them via messenger service or I could pick them up and hand carry them. And if they weren't ready, then I wanted the originals to make photocopies myself to hand carry. They agreed to photocopy everything and send it by messenger. The new practice confirmed that they were in receipt of the records the following day. Best regards, ---Cindy S. Oh, let me tell you, Sheelagh, when I asked that guy how could my cat get distemper if all the other cats were vaccinated?...he started sputtering and spewing because I caught him completely off-guard, and he really didn't have an answer. But the best part was when he was questioning me about why the cat had been seen at the other facility. We had been clients at his facility for 15 years (as I stated). The vet we had been seeing for most of that time (whom we loved) went to a different practice for reasons she didn't divulge, but after speaking to her, I think she simply didn't like the way he was doing business. She said that the first place was just "too big and too busy." (At any given time, there are at least a dozen veterinarians on staff). ROFLOL I can just imagine you with hands on hips, doing the naughty boy look @ him. I bet he was stumped & stuck to the spot umming & Erring?!! Lesson one in spouting, is : "Be ready to take it if you throw it"!! Also, if you had been with the practise for over 15 years, you would think that they had got to know you personally & know each of your cats by name too.... So, then, we were lucky enough to find another vet in the same facility whom we also liked a lot. She was our vet for about a year and a half. She was the one who diagnosed Alex's renal disease, but we sought a second opinion (on Phil's advice) because we were questioning some aspects of the treatment plan. The second opinion was from a sister facility (which we didn't know at the time), and we really liked the veterinarian and the fact that it was only a two-person practice. When our vet at the big facility suddenly quit ("for personal reasons"), we were over at the two-person practice almost instantly. That is reasonable of course, & I would have done the same too. What I find astounding, is the fact that the director of the facility had absolutely no idea what you were talking about?!! It is a bit like a doctor's practise with Doctors who don't speak to one another. Hasn't this practise worked out what case conferences are all about yet? It's almost unbelievable isn't it? Getting the records transferred took quite a bit of effort too. It involved two phone calls and my signing a consent form, and then they transferred only Alex's record (not the other cats' records) and only a few pages of it. We have five cats, two of whom are seniors, and one of whom has a heart murmur, diabetes in remission, and renal dysfunction. Of the younger ones, one of them needed a lot of expensive dental work, and another needed a routine cleaning. Add all of this to annual checkups for five cats, not to mention any other medical needs they find along the way, and this amounts to big bucks flying out the window. How gracious of them! This practise sounds like a brewery that couldn't organise a drinks party!! I am so pleased that you got away from the place. It doesn't sound like a place where I would like to leave my cats in their care either. The notes transfer fiasco is a farce really. This could potentially have cost the cats, their life had the wrong thing happened at the wrong time & you would have had grounds for a law suit there. I know that you wouldn't do that unless you were pushed right up against the wall, but, the point is that they knowingly dragged their feet over the whole process. I guess they didn't like to see that profit margin jumping ship. It is entirely their own fault here though. Had he not questioned the silly fee in the first place, this would never have come o this. Having said that, things sound like you were becoming slowly disenchanted with them over a space of time, would that be right to say? The way I finally got the records was that I gave them a choice (it's always good to give people choices): They needed to have ALL the records for ALL five cats photocopied and ready to be transferred to the new practice by the following afternoon. They could either send them via messenger service or I could pick them up and hand carry them. And if they weren't ready, then I wanted the originals to make photocopies myself to hand carry. They agreed to photocopy everything and send it by messenger. The new practice confirmed that they were in receipt of the records the following day. This is one of the worst excuses of sour grape syndrome that I have ever heard. I had a similar experience when we rescue Lilly & transferred all of the cats to a practise 10 miles away. It is infuriating isn't it? Such a simple task, yet the sour grapes must have turned to vinegar in their mouths?!!! Hardly a friendly nice environment to leave your cats with, & also confirms your feelings of incompetence to the first degree... I'm pleased you took your cats out of their care Cindy. I think you did the right thing there. It allows you to sleep @ night when they are in their care, doesn't it? It's good to hear that all went right in the end & we do have a happy ending here. Way to go Cindy, (high five) Sheelagh "o" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Deadly virus @ Munroe County SPCA
"Cheryl" wrote I prefer now to help others who have the guts to deal with the heartbreak. I admit I close my eyes to some of it. I just can't........................ We're the same this way. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPCA videos | Takayuki | Cat anecdotes | 12 | January 6th 07 05:17 PM |
Smokey's Explicit images of a deadly sin | Enfilade | Cat anecdotes | 27 | June 11th 06 09:57 PM |
HOUSTON SPCA | (WebElder) | Cat health & behaviour | 0 | September 2nd 05 08:13 PM |
deadly virus hits Chicago area shelter | Karen | Cat health & behaviour | 1 | August 25th 05 07:47 AM |