If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Jean,
I'll try to answer below. s/d is for temporary feeding only, and dissolves the crystals. How frequently should a cat be monitored on s/d? If the original stone was confirmed by analysis, then monthly should be enough. c/d-s (now just c/d-and what does this change imply?) is for long-term prevention and maintenance. How frequently does a cat on c/d need to be monitored? The name was changed due to the confusion that existed by having two different forms of c/d - c/d-s for struvite and c/d-oxl for oxalates. The new names are c/d and x/d. Cat's on c/d do not need to be monitored any more frequently than being fed any other diet. Once the vet initially confirms that urine pH is appropriate and no signs of crystals are observed, then annual exams shouold be sufficient. There are questions about Hill's composition. While I can understand why a lower-protein diet might be indicated (even though cats are carnivores, and this seems odd), why does Hill's use such low-quality meat? I have not seen any denial of that, and it would be nice if the meat in the formulas was human-grade and not "floor sweepings". The protein protion of c/d is 90.1% digestible. The objective of a therapeutic diet is to resolve disease issues, not meet Madison Ave marketing requirements. Now is not the time to engage in internet fantasies about "human grade" meats. In regards to "human grade" there is no such thing. I could package horse manure and used engine oil and call it "human grade" with complete immunity. There is no legal definition of "human grade" - it is merely Madison Ave marketing hype. In therapeutic diets the nutrients must take first place on the decision tree, not what "sounds good" and matches Madison Ave marketing glitz. Specific nutrients allow a food of this nature to pass APR studies which prove the food will nto induce struvite crystals in cats. Add a bit (1/8 tsp or so) of vitamin C to food. (Another person says 250-mg pills [smallest possible] two times per day. NOT the chewable type. BUT cats don't like it and it may be dangerous to do this, and some question whether or not that actually acidifies the urine. You couldn't get a cat to eat enough of this to alter the urine pH one tenth of a point. Even force feeding massive amounts failed to move the urine pH half a point. Cranberry-Blueberry extract. While there is data on this in humans, it has nothign to do with urine Ph but ratehr with the ability of certain parts of cranberries to inhibit the attachment of bacteria to the bladder wall. Ther is NO data that suggests this will be the same in cats. Further cats typically have _sterile_ crystals and unlike dogs the issue of bacteria is not the primary driver. Methio-form tablets, which cat may think are a treat. If you use this - do so only under veterinary supervision and do NOT feed an acidifying diet at the same time. You will likely push urine pH into the sub 6.0 range and risk forming CaOX stones. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Jean B." wrote in message ... I have started going back over the posts made on this topic and thought I would post some of my jottings here for comment and for other people's benefit. Food Composition recommended ranges: phosphorous 0.5-0.9 sodium 0.2-0.6* magnesium 0.04-0.10 Hill's s/d: phosphorous 0.52 sodium 0.86* magnesium 0.041 *Moderate sodium is not a problem for cats with struvite crystals (but IS a problem for cats with oxalate crystals) What We Want to Achieve: Urine pH needs to be between 6.2 and 6.3 or 6.4 for maintenance. Needs to be about 6.0 to dissolve crystals that are already present. BUT note that very acidic diets can promote calcium oxalate crystals and uroliths, which are much more dangerous than struvite crystals. Jean, If he's not taking to s/d- c/d - you can try other similarly formulated diets. Iams Low pH/S, Purina UR, or Walthams S/O Control pH. Phil |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Crane wrote:
Jean, I'll try to answer below. s/d is for temporary feeding only, and dissolves the crystals. How frequently should a cat be monitored on s/d? If the original stone was confirmed by analysis, then monthly should be enough. When I asked why I was not given s/d, the vet said that was for stones and Mingy had crystals. As far as the crystals go, I think they just did a quick microscopic analysis. c/d-s (now just c/d-and what does this change imply?) is for long-term prevention and maintenance. How frequently does a cat on c/d need to be monitored? The name was changed due to the confusion that existed by having two different forms of c/d - c/d-s for struvite and c/d-oxl for oxalates. The new names are c/d and x/d. Ah. Well that makes sense. Cat's on c/d do not need to be monitored any more frequently than being fed any other diet. Once the vet initially confirms that urine pH is appropriate and no signs of crystals are observed, then annual exams shouold be sufficient. Okay. We were initially told to go have that checked in 1-2 months. I think I would tend to go sooner, rather than later. There are questions about Hill's composition. While I can understand why a lower-protein diet might be indicated (even though cats are carnivores, and this seems odd), why does Hill's use such low-quality meat? I have not seen any denial of that, and it would be nice if the meat in the formulas was human-grade and not "floor sweepings". The protein protion of c/d is 90.1% digestible. The objective of a therapeutic diet is to resolve disease issues, not meet Madison Ave marketing requirements. Now is not the time to engage in internet fantasies about "human grade" meats. In regards to "human grade" there is no such thing. I could package horse manure and used engine oil and call it "human grade" with complete immunity. There is no legal definition of "human grade" - it is merely Madison Ave marketing hype. In therapeutic diets the nutrients must take first place on the decision tree, not what "sounds good" and matches Madison Ave marketing glitz. Specific nutrients allow a food of this nature to pass APR studies which prove the food will nto induce struvite crystals in cats. But you can also have high-quality meat in a therapeutic diet. Why is this not the case? Why would I want to use "floor-sweepings", meat from possibly diseased organs, etc.? Now here's a possible tip: if you used really high-grade meats in addition to the formula that is (to a newbie to all of this, anyway) scientifically designed to help such cats, then you would have a winning product, which would get less flak. Add a bit (1/8 tsp or so) of vitamin C to food. (Another person says 250-mg pills [smallest possible] two times per day. NOT the chewable type. BUT cats don't like it and it may be dangerous to do this, and some question whether or not that actually acidifies the urine. You couldn't get a cat to eat enough of this to alter the urine pH one tenth of a point. Even force feeding massive amounts failed to move the urine pH half a point. Okay, I've read this more than once. Cranberry-Blueberry extract. While there is data on this in humans, it has nothign to do with urine Ph but ratehr with the ability of certain parts of cranberries to inhibit the attachment of bacteria to the bladder wall. Ther is NO data that suggests this will be the same in cats. Further cats typically have _sterile_ crystals and unlike dogs the issue of bacteria is not the primary driver. And Mingy's culture was negative. Note that I was just putting together notes based on my reading. I was trying NOT to take sides. Methio-form tablets, which cat may think are a treat. If you use this - do so only under veterinary supervision and do NOT feed an acidifying diet at the same time. You will likely push urine pH into the sub 6.0 range and risk forming CaOX stones. That's the problem, isn't it? Seems like one is looking at a small desirable range of urine pH. Now back to the s/d, how low does that push the pH? I assume that is the issue and why cats need to be checked frequently when on that diet. Also, did you see the three different comments I got from three different vets re the use of s/d? What IS the story here? Maybe you answered that elsewhere, so I will continue reading. Thanks for your comments. -- Jean B. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil P." wrote:
If he's not taking to s/d- c/d - you can try other similarly formulated diets. Iams Low pH/S, Purina UR, or Walthams S/O Control pH. Phil Yes, I now have some Eukanuba. It's good to know there are options. -- Jean B. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
But you can also have high-quality meat in a therapeutic diet.
Why is this not the case? Why would I want to use "floor-sweepings", meat from possibly diseased organs, etc.? Now here's a possible tip: if you used really high-grade meats in addition to the formula that is (to a newbie to all of this, anyway) scientifically designed to help such cats, then you would have a winning product, which would get less flak. I guess we need to step back and define what "high quality" meat is? Is it a meat source that is extremely digestible? (90.1%) Is it a meat source that provides a very broad spectrum of amino acids? Is it a meat source that contains very specific levels of nutrients designed to meet the nutrient needs of the cat in any given disease stage? Or is quality defined by Madison Ave marketing glitz about nonsense like "human grade"? The comment about "floor sweepings" is simply Madison Ave marketing glitz in another form. No meats used at Hill's or any other major manufacturer are "floor sweepings" or derived from "diseased organs". I highly doubt that ANY of the larger premium manufacturers would fit in this category. You would have to drop down to the Ol Roy level to find such ingredients. That's simply more catch phrase internet fantasy. The meats used in Hill's products are all USDA graded meats. Many may be parts of the animal that we in our western civilization do not prefer to eat, lungs, pork livers, other internal organs etc. Have you noticed any specials at the grocery store on pork hearts lately? None of these ingredients are "floor sweepings", that's just nonsense used by scaremongers. It makes for great press and gets your attention, but it's patent nonsense. The choice is to provide the right nutrients to resolve disease issues or provide the "right" ingredients to satisfy Madison Ave marketing glitz. In the case of animals with some disease condition, providing the right nutrients MUST always take precedence over Madison Ave marketing hype. Now back to the s/d, how low does that push the pH? I assume that is the issue and why cats need to be checked frequently when on that diet. Also, did you see the three different comments I got from three different vets re the use of s/d? What IS the story here? Maybe you answered that elsewhere, so I will continue reading. Prescription Diet s/d is designed to drive urine pH down to the 5.9-6.1 range. For that reason is can only be fed on a short term basis and must be monitored carefully by a veterinarian. Understanding risks must also be taken into account. Struvite crystal formation is common in cats between 2-5 years of age, after age 7 Calcium Oxalate are more common. Certain breeds - Persian, Himalyan and Burmese are more prone to CaOx stones at any age. For these reasons a vet needs to be involved. Suppose you have a 9 year old Persian presented with crystals - would s/d be a good choice? Absolutely not, unless the stone was analyzed as struvite, the vet found urine pH around 7+ etc. It is interesting to note that all the cat foods on the market which make claims about "urinary tract health" are required to drive urine pH down below 6.0 for one year in order to use that claim. These foods hit the grocery store shelves in the early 80's - at about the same time that CaOx stones began to become more prevalent and common in cats. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Crane wrote:
But you can also have high-quality meat in a therapeutic diet. Why is this not the case? Why would I want to use "floor-sweepings", meat from possibly diseased organs, etc.? Now here's a possible tip: if you used really high-grade meats in addition to the formula that is (to a newbie to all of this, anyway) scientifically designed to help such cats, then you would have a winning product, which would get less flak. I guess we need to step back and define what "high quality" meat is? Is it a meat source that is extremely digestible? (90.1%) Is it a meat source that provides a very broad spectrum of amino acids? Is it a meat source that contains very specific levels of nutrients designed to meet the nutrient needs of the cat in any given disease stage? Or is quality defined by Madison Ave marketing glitz about nonsense like "human grade"? The comment about "floor sweepings" is simply Madison Ave marketing glitz in another form. No meats used at Hill's or any other major manufacturer are "floor sweepings" or derived from "diseased organs". I highly doubt that ANY of the larger premium manufacturers would fit in this category. You would have to drop down to the Ol Roy level to find such ingredients. That's simply more catch phrase internet fantasy. The meats used in Hill's products are all USDA graded meats. Many may be parts of the animal that we in our western civilization do not prefer to eat, lungs, pork livers, other internal organs etc. Have you noticed any specials at the grocery store on pork hearts lately? None of these ingredients are "floor sweepings", that's just nonsense used by scaremongers. It makes for great press and gets your attention, but it's patent nonsense. The choice is to provide the right nutrients to resolve disease issues or provide the "right" ingredients to satisfy Madison Ave marketing glitz. In the case of animals with some disease condition, providing the right nutrients MUST always take precedence over Madison Ave marketing hype. Okay. Thank you for clarifying. That's exactly what I want to know. Now back to the s/d, how low does that push the pH? I assume that is the issue and why cats need to be checked frequently when on that diet. Also, did you see the three different comments I got from three different vets re the use of s/d? What IS the story here? Maybe you answered that elsewhere, so I will continue reading. Prescription Diet s/d is designed to drive urine pH down to the 5.9-6.1 range. For that reason is can only be fed on a short term basis and must be monitored carefully by a veterinarian. Understanding risks must also be taken into account. Struvite crystal formation is common in cats between 2-5 years of age, after age 7 Calcium Oxalate are more common. Certain breeds - Persian, Himalyan and Burmese are more prone to CaOx stones at any age. For these reasons a vet needs to be involved. Suppose you have a 9 year old Persian presented with crystals - would s/d be a good choice? Absolutely not, unless the stone was analyzed as struvite, the vet found urine pH around 7+ etc. It is interesting to note that all the cat foods on the market which make claims about "urinary tract health" are required to drive urine pH down below 6.0 for one year in order to use that claim. These foods hit the grocery store shelves in the early 80's - at about the same time that CaOx stones began to become more prevalent and common in cats. Yes, I have read that. :-( BYW, Mingy is a color-point Persian. He was diagnosed with struvite crystals/blockage. They appear to have decided that just on the basis of a quick microscopic examination. I have been told the following by the three vets (in case you didn't see all of this): 1. Put him on c/d kibble. Vet preferred kibble. No mention of s/d 2. Vet strongly urges use of canned food. 3. Vet seems to prefer canned food and gives me cans of s/d, c/d, and Eukanuba. Says something like s/d is higher grade. This is not only confusing, but ill-advised and just plain sloppy advice. No wonder I am trying to figure out my approach here and doing as much research as I can stand online. -- Jean B. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Jean B. at wrote on
1/29/05 8:20 PM: Steve Crane wrote: But you can also have high-quality meat in a therapeutic diet. Why is this not the case? Why would I want to use "floor-sweepings", meat from possibly diseased organs, etc.? Now here's a possible tip: if you used really high-grade meats in addition to the formula that is (to a newbie to all of this, anyway) scientifically designed to help such cats, then you would have a winning product, which would get less flak. I guess we need to step back and define what "high quality" meat is? Is it a meat source that is extremely digestible? (90.1%) Is it a meat source that provides a very broad spectrum of amino acids? Is it a meat source that contains very specific levels of nutrients designed to meet the nutrient needs of the cat in any given disease stage? Or is quality defined by Madison Ave marketing glitz about nonsense like "human grade"? The comment about "floor sweepings" is simply Madison Ave marketing glitz in another form. No meats used at Hill's or any other major manufacturer are "floor sweepings" or derived from "diseased organs". I highly doubt that ANY of the larger premium manufacturers would fit in this category. You would have to drop down to the Ol Roy level to find such ingredients. That's simply more catch phrase internet fantasy. The meats used in Hill's products are all USDA graded meats. Many may be parts of the animal that we in our western civilization do not prefer to eat, lungs, pork livers, other internal organs etc. Have you noticed any specials at the grocery store on pork hearts lately? None of these ingredients are "floor sweepings", that's just nonsense used by scaremongers. It makes for great press and gets your attention, but it's patent nonsense. The choice is to provide the right nutrients to resolve disease issues or provide the "right" ingredients to satisfy Madison Ave marketing glitz. In the case of animals with some disease condition, providing the right nutrients MUST always take precedence over Madison Ave marketing hype. Okay. Thank you for clarifying. That's exactly what I want to know. Now back to the s/d, how low does that push the pH? I assume that is the issue and why cats need to be checked frequently when on that diet. Also, did you see the three different comments I got from three different vets re the use of s/d? What IS the story here? Maybe you answered that elsewhere, so I will continue reading. Prescription Diet s/d is designed to drive urine pH down to the 5.9-6.1 range. For that reason is can only be fed on a short term basis and must be monitored carefully by a veterinarian. Understanding risks must also be taken into account. Struvite crystal formation is common in cats between 2-5 years of age, after age 7 Calcium Oxalate are more common. Certain breeds - Persian, Himalyan and Burmese are more prone to CaOx stones at any age. For these reasons a vet needs to be involved. Suppose you have a 9 year old Persian presented with crystals - would s/d be a good choice? Absolutely not, unless the stone was analyzed as struvite, the vet found urine pH around 7+ etc. It is interesting to note that all the cat foods on the market which make claims about "urinary tract health" are required to drive urine pH down below 6.0 for one year in order to use that claim. These foods hit the grocery store shelves in the early 80's - at about the same time that CaOx stones began to become more prevalent and common in cats. Yes, I have read that. :-( BYW, Mingy is a color-point Persian. He was diagnosed with struvite crystals/blockage. They appear to have decided that just on the basis of a quick microscopic examination. I have been told the following by the three vets (in case you didn't see all of this): 1. Put him on c/d kibble. Vet preferred kibble. No mention of s/d 2. Vet strongly urges use of canned food. 3. Vet seems to prefer canned food and gives me cans of s/d, c/d, and Eukanuba. Says something like s/d is higher grade. This is not only confusing, but ill-advised and just plain sloppy advice. No wonder I am trying to figure out my approach here and doing as much research as I can stand online. I will tell you that I had a red persian that got crystals and would eliminate inappropriately. I fed him the c/d we would go off of it ocassionally but he did VERY well with it. You can *also* over worry which will stress Mingy. I would add a high quality canned food he likes and supplement with the low pH food (whichever he likes best). Add a Feliway diffuser. This is basically what I;ve done with Grant. It has worked very well. I do keep an eye on potty habits but he only had one slight relapse about 3 mmonths after the first and it was such that it was just a sludgy plug that my vet worked out manually, quickly and he has never had a problem since. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
----------------------
High phos foods???? I didn't see any mention of high phos f=ADoods. I see you're here once again to defend your employer, Hills. You should =ADspend more of your time trying to teach them that dry food is not an appropriat=ADe diet for a carnivore. Isn't it funny that many people who switch to a food like We=ADllness report how much better their cats are doing? Sorry that it upsets you =ADso much -------------------------- Hey Lauren....Does OMH recommend their products for FLUTD or is that just the opinion of an internet hack like yourself? Seems to me that if the company that makes the stuff doesn't even recommend it for FLUTD, then YOU shouldn't either! Also, why do you continue to persist in falsely maintaining that a "dry food" is not "appropriate" for cats? Millions and millions of cats have thrived on dry diets and continue to do so. For someone who works for/with lawyers, it continues to amuse me that the truth doesn't seem to hold much sway over you! As for Steve defending Hill's, why does that "upset you so much"? He wasn't defending them, he was explaining to the OP what the difference was between c/d-s and c/d (just a name change). He then provided additional info. For the thousandth time, I'll ask you: Why are you such a Hill's Hater?? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need more info on FLUTD/FUS. | Mike | Cat health & behaviour | 12 | April 6th 04 12:23 AM |
Need suggestions on a New food | Mike | Cat health & behaviour | 46 | March 10th 04 05:27 PM |
Liz's Food recommendations | Steve Crane | Cat health & behaviour | 454 | October 20th 03 08:20 PM |
Before commercial cat food..... | Kitten M | Cat health & behaviour | 716 | October 18th 03 02:04 AM |
Just read about what is really in cat food | kate | Cat health & behaviour | 422 | September 3rd 03 01:18 AM |