Gaubster is Steve Crane's sock puppet -- it's now official!!!

in thread : shelly
whittled the following words:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:01:26 -0600, diddy
wrote:

Because it's on company time?

or so you assume.

actually, i do spend a good bit of time Googling and searching Usenet
and reading various mail lists, as well as searching a buttload of
on-line resources. it's a boring-as-hell part of my j-o-b. HTH!

And it's not just an occassional occurance.

really? why don't you go total up all those posts that i've made on
"company time."

I'll leave that up to

mgagoATindiana.edu, cviersATindiana.edu, mwailesATindiana.edu,
ecoryATindiana.edu, mwailesATindiana.edu
Now go do some damage control! have a nice day!

On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:15:52 -0600, diddy
wrote:

mgagoATindiana.edu, cviersATindiana.edu, mwailesATindiana.edu,
ecoryATindiana.edu, mwailesATindiana.edu

what peculiar and interesting choices. Mechael might be able to help
you out. she's quite nice. be sure to tell her i said hi! as for
the rest, i really have to wonder at your thought processes.

--
shelly
http://home.bluemarble.net/~scouvrette || http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com

We are asleep with compasses in our hands.
-- W.S. Merwin

"shelly" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:28:13 -0600, diddy
wrote:

Well they might be interested in how much PAID time you spent posting.

believe it or not, some paid time is my own to do with as i see fit.

It shouldn't be hard to prove considering that rhetoric flows from you
like
an overflowing stool. Simply compare your postings to your work hours.
Should
be interesting

knock yourself out. however, i really doubt my boss is going to waste
her time comparing my posting times with my work schedule. she's
quite happy with my job performance and, i suspect, has much better
things to do.


Kind of like Steve Crane's boss, eh? I think she should be
held accountable for your actions. I mean, after all, it takes
everyone all of three seconds to connect you with the
University.

"shelly" wrote in message
arble.net...
on 2005-03-13 at 14:06 wrote:

I think they should try, I mean really.

good luck with that! seriously, what possible interest could
they have in this post?

--

It doesn't matter if they do or don't. If anyone THINKS they
should, they can complain, just as you complained to Steve's
boss. Are you *thunk* getting it *slap* through your thick
skull *whap* yet? We are trying to make a point here.
Going RL on people and copping them sucks, sunshine.

"shelly" wrote in message
arble.net...
on 2005-03-13 at 14:05 wrote:

I think someone should complain to her boss.

if you'd like her e-mail addy, e-mail me privately and i'll be
more than happy to give it to you. i'm not sure what you hope
to accomplish by bitching to her, but knock yourself out!

I'm an entirely different type of asshole.

yes, well, that's painfully obvious.


Oh I don't know, it's kind of fun. For me.

equalizer wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:07:15 -0500, "Mary"
wrote:


equalizer wrote in message
.. .


In what way?

Let me edit it a little differently:



On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:47:46 -0600, diddy
wrote:

I don't THINK



The root of the problem surfaces.......

eq

Ahhhh. Okay, I get you.

"shelly" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:13:31 -0500, "Mary"
wrote:

You don't know that. You assume that. It's a false conclusion.

no, i can't know for 100% certain that they are aware of his actions.
however, i think it's a safe enough assumption that i'm willing to
make it.

What if he is the one who handles the email? lol

i really doubt that he works in their complaints department.
lololololol!


Shelly, you jumped to a conclusion. And you went too far
when you went RL on Steve and complained to his boss.
What happens in Usenet should stay in Usenet--unless you
think you would like everyone in your RL to know all about
everything you post about. What's good for the goose, and all
that? I have no interest in you, your boss, or your opinions for
that matter. I was just making a point. Don't do that **** to
people unless you want it done to you.

"KellyH" wrote in message
...
wrote
It is. Go to this page and scroll down to the executive officer bio:
http://www.ksdemolay.org/info.html

It makes it even *more* scummy that someone who supposedly lives a faith
based life engages in such fraud. It's the ultimate hypocrisy.

Megan

I thought it was odd that the only topic Gaubster responded to, besides
cat
food discussions, was school prayer and politics.


I want to know where this stupid "Gaubster " nym came from.

In article 1110749045.61965f4b5ec311cdf1be3abbf9474e09@teran ews,
Mary wrote:
I want to know where this stupid "Gaubster " nym came from.

Last name "Gaub."
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis -

George Bush's proposed budget will create $1.6 trillion in additional
federal debt, compared to just tracking inflation, according to the CBO.

"shelly" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:48:04 -0500, "Mary"
wrote:

You asked how diddy decided you worked at IU, and I told you.

no, that's not what i asked Diddy. i asked her which parts of my
headers indicate i'm posting from IU. that sort of thing might become
important if she intends to bitch to my employer.

Yes, well, split hairs all you want. I then looked at your headers
and noticed that between your posting name and your email,
"voila" we have your real name. Not too ingenious, really.


Before you start
netcopping people to their bosses, uh, it might be best
for you to remove your full name from your posts.

why? what possible interest could my employer have in my posting to
Usenet?


People can MAKE them interested, doll. Take the larger
point--don't go RL on people.