If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How Much to Feed Cat?
I usually give Mico one half of a tuna sized can of food a day. Lately he's
been eating it all, and then wanting more. Mico is almost one and a half years old, and is Siamese. I don't want him to become obese. Due to hunger he's taken to ugly habits like licking the floor when there's no more food left. Ugh. Should I feed him more? What is 'normal' for a cat like him? Thanks in advance, - Ruby Tuesday |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Ruby Tuesday" wrote in message
... I usually give Mico one half of a tuna sized can of food a day. Lately he's been eating it all, and then wanting more. Mico is almost one and a half years old, and is Siamese. I don't want him to become obese. Due to hunger he's taken to ugly habits like licking the floor when there's no more food left. Ugh. Should I feed him more? What is 'normal' for a cat like him? When mine were on tinned food they used to get a tin each a day & were still hungry. I've been feeding scienceplan dried food for the last 10 or so years and just leave a bowl out for them to help themselves. Initially they binged because I assume they were used to eating food while it was there when I fed them twice a day but quickly they realised that there would always be food when they were peckish and just nibbled all through the day. Unlike dogs, cats are able to excercise self control and not eat everything within their line of sight and therefore shoud not really get obese. Of course there are rare exceptions but it also depends on what they are fed, high fat human food might taste nice and be cute to feed them but is basically bad for them. If you feed a good quality dried food and leave it available all the time your cat shoud not need to binge and will eat to suit. -- I.P.Freely |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-11-22, I.P.Freely penned:
"Ruby Tuesday" wrote in message ... I usually give Mico one half of a tuna sized can of food a day. Lately he's been eating it all, and then wanting more. Mico is almost one and a half years old, and is Siamese. I don't want him to become obese. Due to hunger he's taken to ugly habits like licking the floor when there's no more food left. Ugh. Should I feed him more? What is 'normal' for a cat like him? When mine were on tinned food they used to get a tin each a day & were still hungry. I've been feeding scienceplan dried food for the last 10 or so years and just leave a bowl out for them to help themselves. Initially they binged because I assume they were used to eating food while it was there when I fed them twice a day but quickly they realised that there would always be food when they were peckish and just nibbled all through the day. Unlike dogs, cats are able to excercise self control and not eat everything within their line of sight and therefore shoud not really get obese. Hey now, watch the gross generalizations! My dog "grazed" for his entire life. The bowl of food was always there for him, but he tended to only eat when we were eating. It probably helped that he had no other dogs to contend with for food. Anyway, I also leave dry food out for my cat. I think most animals can handle this sort of approach, especially if they become accustomed to it while young. I use Nutro Natural Choice, as an aside, because it seems to produce the least noxious litterbox offerings. Of course there are rare exceptions but it also depends on what they are fed, high fat human food might taste nice and be cute to feed them but is basically bad for them. If you feed a good quality dried food and leave it available all the time your cat shoud not need to binge and will eat to suit. -- monique |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-11-22, kaeli penned:
They don't just eat when they're hungry. Neither do most humans. I still haven't figured out how Oscar is more than skin and bones, since she seems to eat one kibble at a time. She never parks herself at the bowl and just eats. Maybe she read somewhere that many small meals are better than 2-3 large ones? Still, one kibble at a time ... it's just weird. She seems to drink more often than she eats. Of course, she deals with tuna entirely differently! And cats can have very low thirst drives. Eating nothing but dry food is a known risk factor in having kidney problems later in life because of chronic dehydration. Some cats will drink plenty to make up for the lack of water in their food. Others will not. If a cat doesn't drink enough, their urine gets too concentrated and they can develop stones, infections, and be constipated. So if you choose to free-feed, be aware of how much your cat drinks. If it isn't enough, you NEED to add wet. A cat's natural diet consists of all the water they need, so in the wild, they wouldn't need to drink at all. If I had known this earlier in my life, I really think I wouldn't have lost the cats I lost at early ages due to bladder and kidney problems. We always free-fed dry, too. I now feed a combo of portioned dry in the morning and wet at night. (If they'd eat decent quality wet food, I'd only feed them that.) I didn't know this. As with human care, it seems that good advice for one goal conflicts with good advice for another goal. Isn't constant wet food bad for their teeth? (Oscar eats entirely dry food except for a small portion of the can when I'm having tuna, and her breath is daisy-fresh! Well, maybe not daisy, but it's not smelly at all.) -- monique |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... I didn't know this. As with human care, it seems that good advice for one goal conflicts with good advice for another goal. Isn't constant wet food bad for their teeth? I don't know about that, but I *do* know that dry food is bad for them period, according to this article: http://www.catsincanada.com/articles/feeding.html - Ruby Tuesday |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-11-22, Ruby Tuesday penned:
"Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... I didn't know this. As with human care, it seems that good advice for one goal conflicts with good advice for another goal. Isn't constant wet food bad for their teeth? I don't know about that, but I *do* know that dry food is bad for them period, according to this article: http://www.catsincanada.com/articles/feeding.html - Ruby Tuesday Interesting. It makes some intuitive sense, but I'm reluctant to believe anything I see based on only one opinion (not that sheer volume of opinion guarantees accuracy, either!). I'm trying to find more such opinions online, without much luck. Can't seem to find the right search criteria. Oscar is also getting some shots in a week; I can ask our vet what she thinks then. (Not that vets and doctors can't be wrong! We talked to a doctor while Eric was in the hospital who had "never heard of" cat saliva being involved in cat allergies, and gave us that condescending "I'll humor your silly layman's ideas" look that I really, really hate.) -- monique |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Ruby Tuesday" wrote in message ...
"Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message ... I don't know about that, but I *do* know that dry food is bad for them period, according to this article: http://www.catsincanada.com/articles/feeding.html - Ruby Tuesday Dry food is not "bad" for cats - such a claim is utter nonsense and totally unsupported anywhere in the literature. Neither are canned foods "bad" for cats either. Current hysterical carbo-phobic claims not withstanding. Every one of the individuals currently pushing carbo-phobia in pet foods have consistently failed to answer the biggest question of all. Feeding canned foods, particularly some of the ones currently on the market, _vastly_ increases the intake of calcium and phosphorus. Take Pro Plan Adult Ocean Fish & Crab Entree for an example. Here's a zero carbohydrate food - perfect for the carbo-phobics. What happens when you take away energy provided by carbohydrates and substitute energy provided by fats and proteins? In almost every case the levels of various minerals _greatly_ increase. The Pro Plan product is typical example. Calcium at a whopping 2.72%, phosphorus at a whopping 2.07% DMB. Way in excess of what even a grwoing kittens needs, much less an adult. The carbo-phobics consistently ignore the number two killer of cats in this country - renal failure. Nobody can determine which cat will die from this disease. Nobody has a crystal ball capable of determining which kitty will be the next victim. Unfortunately we cannot tell if a cat has renal failure until 70+% of the kidney is destroyed and the cat is on a uninterruptable spiral to death. Feeding a diet with phos levels as high as the majority of the carbo-phobics preferred diets, to a cat with undetected sub clinical renal failure would unquestionably speed that cat toward death. What would happen to the cat population which contains literally thousands upon thousands of cats with currently undetected sub clinical renal failure, if we suddenly dumped all these cats on the carbo-phobics diet plan? This is the hard question that the carbo-phobics never want to answer. If the current crop of hyperbolic carbo-phobics at least had the common sense to caution prospective cat owners of the dangers involved it would be one thing. If that had the common sense to at least caution pet owners with older cats to check phos levels in a diet it would be one thing. But instead they launch off on a hyperbolic fantasy trip and alledge, without any proof whatsoever, that every disease known to cats is the result of feeding a carbohydrate based diet. An allegation for which they have zero clinical trials or peer reviewed published data to support. The website you quoted is typical example of carbo-phobia hysterics. Below are a few errors from the website. "Cats have a physiological decrease in the ability to utilize carbohydrates due to the lack of specific enzymatic pathways that are present in other mammals, and the lack a salivary enzyme called amylase." Nonsense – cats can and do utilize carbohydrates quite well. Cows lack salivary amylase as well – following this nonsensical logic cows must also eat a meat diet. While not recommended, cats can and do survive quite well on a pure vegetarian diet. UC Davis currently has a colony of cats that have survived quite well for generations on a corn gluten based diet without any meat of any kind for many years. "Diabetes: "Diabetes is a very serious - and difficult to manage - disease that is very common in cats. Why is it so common? The species-inappropriate high level of carbohydrates in dry food wreaks havoc on the blood sugar level of an obligate carnivore. The blood sugar level rises significantly upon ingestion of dry food. With chronic hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) the insulin producing cells in the pancreas down-regulate, or "burn out," leading to diabetes." Again nonsense. Cats that already have diabetes may be better served with a low carb diet, or even a high fiber diet. There are lots of peer reviewed published data to support either method. To make the fantasy jump in logic that dry foods _cause_ diabetes is just plain nonsense. Using this same logic - cats with renal failure must eat a low phosphorus food, therefore high phosphorus _causes_ renal failure. The proof of this logical fault is as follows: "My father ate green peas as a child, he died of colon cancer at age 34, therefore green peas cause colon caner" While the first two parts of the argument are true, they in no way make the last part of the statement true. About time for the legalese I suppose: While I have been an employee of Hill's Pet Nutrition for over 20 years, any comment I make here is my opinion and my opinion alone and should in no way be construed as representative of the company I work for. It is my opinion and my opinion alone. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Ruby Tuesday"
Date: 11/22/04 2:15 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: "Monique Y. Mudama" wrote in message . .. I didn't know this. As with human care, it seems that good advice for one goal conflicts with good advice for another goal. Isn't constant wet food bad for their teeth? I don't know about that, but I *do* know that dry food is bad for them period, according to this article: http://www.catsincanada.com/articles/feeding.html Dry cat food is not "bad" per se. There is a certain segment of the population that is fanatical in their beliefs. Since most cats in the US are fed dry, wouldn't "most" cats in the US be sick? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
I didn't know this. As with human care, it seems that good advice for one goal conflicts with good advice for another goal. Isn't constant wet food bad for their teeth? It used to be believed that dry food was better for their teeth (not that canned was bad for teeth), but that opinion didn't consider the fact that most cats either gobble dry without chewing, or chew it very little. Meanwhile, if they do chew, it's grain-based dry foods that tend to leave a starchy coating on teeth to cause plaque, while a low-carb canned leaves less debris in the mouth. -- jamie ) "There's a seeker born every minute." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FDA to rethink animal feed rule due to mad cow | Steve | Cat health & behaviour | 38 | December 29th 03 11:26 PM |