If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
Yowie wrote:
Disagreement is fine, healthy even. But ad hominem is never necessary in a healthy and robust debate between intelligent grown ups. It is the mark of those who have no better way to put their argument across. Unfortunately, some people who are quite good at putting their argument across also indulge in ad hominem attacks. Just because someone is smart, well-informed, and a logical thinker, that doesn't preclude them from being a plain ol' a$$h*l*. I've seen it plenty on Usenet. The problem as I see it is people being jerks, not whether they're good or bad at formulating arguments. I do think everyone's entitled to have an opinion, and to express it, even if they're not particularly bright. Or if they are bright, but tend to think in non-linear ways, so aren't articulate in presenting their arguments. What they're not entitled to do is slam other people in personal ways. Imagine what discussions would be like if *nobody* ever insulted anyone else personally. Some people would be brilliant, some, not so brilliant, but all would be engaged in lively but peaceful debate. Joyce -- The sun rose slowly, like a fiery furball coughed up uneasily onto a sky-blue carpet by a giant unseen cat. -- Michael McGarel |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
wrote in message
... Yowie wrote: Disagreement is fine, healthy even. But ad hominem is never necessary in a healthy and robust debate between intelligent grown ups. It is the mark of those who have no better way to put their argument across. Unfortunately, some people who are quite good at putting their argument across also indulge in ad hominem attacks. Just because someone is smart, well-informed, and a logical thinker, that doesn't preclude them from being a plain ol' a$$h*l*. I've seen it plenty on Usenet. The problem as I see it is people being jerks, not whether they're good or bad at formulating arguments. I do think everyone's entitled to have an opinion, and to express it, even if they're not particularly bright. Or if they are bright, but tend to think in non-linear ways, so aren't articulate in presenting their arguments. What they're not entitled to do is slam other people in personal ways. Imagine what discussions would be like if *nobody* ever insulted anyone else personally. Some people would be brilliant, some, not so brilliant, but all would be engaged in lively but peaceful debate. Joyce -- The sun rose slowly, like a fiery furball coughed up uneasily onto a sky-blue carpet by a giant unseen cat. -- Michael McGarel Wouldn't it be loverly? Actually, I have been involved in discussions like that - not many, especially not lately, but it can happen. It is delightful. Joy |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
In ,
Joy typed: wrote in message ... Yowie wrote: Disagreement is fine, healthy even. But ad hominem is never necessary in a healthy and robust debate between intelligent grown ups. It is the mark of those who have no better way to put their argument across. Unfortunately, some people who are quite good at putting their argument across also indulge in ad hominem attacks. Just because someone is smart, well-informed, and a logical thinker, that doesn't preclude them from being a plain ol' a$$h*l*. I've seen it plenty on Usenet. The problem as I see it is people being jerks, not whether they're good or bad at formulating arguments. I do think everyone's entitled to have an opinion, and to express it, even if they're not particularly bright. Or if they are bright, but tend to think in non-linear ways, so aren't articulate in presenting their arguments. What they're not entitled to do is slam other people in personal ways. Imagine what discussions would be like if *nobody* ever insulted anyone else personally. Some people would be brilliant, some, not so brilliant, but all would be engaged in lively but peaceful debate. Joyce -- The sun rose slowly, like a fiery furball coughed up uneasily onto a sky-blue carpet by a giant unseen cat. -- Michael McGarel Wouldn't it be loverly? Actually, I have been involved in discussions like that - not many, especially not lately, but it can happen. It is delightful. yes, when they occur, I always feel that I've learnt a good deal - more often about myself and my own biases than anything else, but its always a learning experience. And a loverly one at that. Where one can still shake hands and sincerely wish the opposing side 'all the best'. Yowie |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
wrote in message ... Christina Websell wrote: All vegetarians I know are slim. Except the one in my team at work. It was quite difficult keeping N fed when she was here. If we went out for a few hours we'd have to take things to eat. 5 ft 10 - 8 stone - she needed it. It probably has nothing to do with her being a vegetarian. It sounds like she has an exceptionally high metabolism. If she needs to eat every few hours, that means she's burning up calories at a high rate. I wonder if she suffers from a bit of hyperthyroidism? Or some other metabolic condition? It's one thing to be thin due to a high metabolism. But if she really gets so hungry she's practically fainting every few hours, something's going on. Has she ever had it checked out? She's a doctor herself. She has an extra-high metabolism, and it was, if we went out "are we taking provisions..? I've never met anyone who can eat twice as much as I do and remain so slender. One breakfast was not enough - there had to be "second breakfast" two hours later - and every few hours "I think I need a little something" She says it's quite a nuisance to have to eat so often. Tweed |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
"Christina Websell" wrote in message
... wrote in message ... Christina Websell wrote: All vegetarians I know are slim. Except the one in my team at work. It was quite difficult keeping N fed when she was here. If we went out for a few hours we'd have to take things to eat. 5 ft 10 - 8 stone - she needed it. It probably has nothing to do with her being a vegetarian. It sounds like she has an exceptionally high metabolism. If she needs to eat every few hours, that means she's burning up calories at a high rate. I wonder if she suffers from a bit of hyperthyroidism? Or some other metabolic condition? It's one thing to be thin due to a high metabolism. But if she really gets so hungry she's practically fainting every few hours, something's going on. Has she ever had it checked out? She's a doctor herself. She has an extra-high metabolism, and it was, if we went out "are we taking provisions..? I've never met anyone who can eat twice as much as I do and remain so slender. One breakfast was not enough - there had to be "second breakfast" two hours later - and every few hours "I think I need a little something" She says it's quite a nuisance to have to eat so often. Tweed I'm sure it must be. It must also be rather expensive. Joy |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
"Joy" wrote in message . .. "Christina Websell" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... Christina Websell wrote: All vegetarians I know are slim. Except the one in my team at work. It was quite difficult keeping N fed when she was here. If we went out for a few hours we'd have to take things to eat. 5 ft 10 - 8 stone - she needed it. It probably has nothing to do with her being a vegetarian. It sounds like she has an exceptionally high metabolism. If she needs to eat every few hours, that means she's burning up calories at a high rate. I wonder if she suffers from a bit of hyperthyroidism? Or some other metabolic condition? It's one thing to be thin due to a high metabolism. But if she really gets so hungry she's practically fainting every few hours, something's going on. Has she ever had it checked out? She's a doctor herself. She has an extra-high metabolism, and it was, if we went out "are we taking provisions..? I've never met anyone who can eat twice as much as I do and remain so slender. One breakfast was not enough - there had to be "second breakfast" two hours later - and every few hours "I think I need a little something" She says it's quite a nuisance to have to eat so often. Tweed I'm sure it must be. It must also be rather expensive. Joy Germany is not really set up for vegetarians, especially in the remote place she lives. Despite what Joyce said she was delighted to gain weight here with all the nice veggie options we have, like Quorn. If Quorn travelled well I'd be sending her some every week. It doesn't help that she hates to cook. Her stance is "I like to eat, not to cook!" Well, we all do, but as I have carefully explained, if I don't cook, I don't eat ;-) Tweed |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
Christina Websell wrote:
Germany is not really set up for vegetarians, especially in the remote place she lives. From what I've seen of German cooking (not much, but I have gone to one or two German restaurants), it is very meat-oriented, so what you say makes sense to me. Despite what Joyce said she was delighted to gain weight here with all the nice veggie options we have, like Quorn. I don't think I said she didn't want to gain weight, only that her metabolism must be very high, for her to get hungry so often. It sounds like she might not get enough calories in her usual diet, and maybe she finally did get enough in the UK? Joyce -- I want freedom, the right to self expression, everyone's right to beautiful radiant things. -- Emma Goldman |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
I'm so awdul (OT)
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|