If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Forensics: Veterinarian blazes medical trail
This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I
thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html Article copied from AJC.com: Forensics: Veterinarian blazes medical trail Fulton County vet plays crime detective in cases of animal abuse By PAUL KAPLAN The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 03/13/05 The kitten was 8 weeks old, and already it had been to hell and back. There was blood in its lungs, and one side of its head was smashed. The young couple that brought the little white Persian to the veterinarian said it was hurt in a fall from a countertop. No way, Dr. Melinda Merck said to herself. First of all, cats are nimble and usually land on all fours. But even if it had fallen, a 2-pound kitten would not generate enough force to cause such severe injuries. As she examined the cat, Merck ruled out the possibility of a car having hit it because it had no abrasions. As soon as the couple left, she called animal control. An officer went to interview the couple, and the young man finally admitted he'd slammed the kitten into a wall. That was Merck's first experience in medical sleuthing, back in 1990. Fifteen years later, she's a leading authority in the emerging field of animal forensics. Fulton and Cobb counties bring her in regularly to help investigate and treat abused and neglected animals. She got the call last month when 205 cats were found inside a house in Alpharetta. All but 26 were dead. Merck could not have handled a case of that magnitude a decade ago. Back then, she was teaching herself animal forensics because nobody else was doing it. It was like fishing off the end of the world. In those days, even the worst cases of animal abuse could be prosecuted only as a misdemeanor in Georgia and most other states. As a result, many prosecutors were uninterested. Claudine Wilkins, a former Cobb County prosecutor now in private practice, recalls the time she was visiting a judge in his chambers to discuss an animal abuse case when he told her: "If I can't sit on it or eat it, an animal is useless to me." "That's the mentality we're dealing with," said Wilkins, who does legal advocacy work for abused animals. Then, in 2000, the Georgia Legislature passed the state Animal Protection Act, which turned the worst cases of abuse into felonies. That changed things. A nonprofit called Georgia Legal Professionals for Animals was formed, mainly by volunteer lawyers and paralegals willing to help prosecute animal abusers. They were badly needed because felony convictions are harder to win. They require proof of abuse that was "knowingly and maliciously" com- mitted. "To reach that higher standard, you need good science," said Randy Lockwood, vice president of the Humane Society of the United States and an animal forensics expert. "Dr. Merck and a couple of other people are on the cutting edge of trying to move that field along." It's been a slow process, but animal forensics has advanced significantly since Merck got started. She had to learn by hanging out with crime scene investigators (CSIs) at human crime scenes and with coroners during autopsies. With virtually no animal forensics or legal help back then, it was open season on animal abuse. When cases were so horrific that charges were filed, Merck said, "It was just he said/she said." Now, with forensic specialists involved, it's he said/she presents the evidence. One reason animal forensics remains in its infancy is that veterinary schools don't teach it. Merck and Dr. Paige Carmichael, a pathologist at the University of Georgia Veterinary School, have put together a proposal to teach a course as an elective at UGA. It would be the first in the nation. A growth industry What has been growing much faster than animal forensics is animal law. "Eight years ago, when I got out of law school, there weren't any animal lawyers," Wilkins said. "Now they're all over the place." A big reason is that more than 20 law schools have courses in animal law, including Harvard, Lockwood said. Wilkins predicted that animal forensics will have a similar growth spiral when vet schools start teaching the course. What the students will learn is that there are similarities between human and animal forensics. The study of bullet trajectories and stab wound angles are similar in both, for example. And there are major differences. Animals have completely different blood types than humans, and they don't bruise externally like humans do because their skin is built for life in the wild and for fighting. The biggest difference is that there's only one human species compared with countless animal species. As the species change, so do the forensics. That's fine with Merck. "I like challenges," she said. "I like puzzles." She also likes animals, of course, and is not shy about it. The bumper sticker on the back of her Lexus says "I (heart) cats" and her cellphone ring is the theme from "The Pink Panther." Animals, Merck said, "don't give you grief, they return affection, and they listen well." She gives the love right back by helping the authorities make cases against people who intentionally hurt animals. She just might be a dog's best friend. When she was growing up in Lubbock, Texas, Merck would bring home injured cats and birds, "much to my parents' dismay." Now she's a veteran of the animal abuse wars who recalls horrible cases in a detached clinical monotone, as if she were dictating the list of wounds to a tape recorder. But suddenly she'll pause in midsentence and become teary-eyed. She'll turn away reflexively, reach into her purse for a Marlboro Ultra Light, and fire it up. Then she'll turn back and calmly resume the monotone. "We deal with very sad cases, very nasty things done by very violent people," Lockwood said. "Melinda offers a good blend of the heart and the head. She gets emotionally involved in the issues but doesn't let that disable her." Abuse breeds abuse Since she started working in forensics, Merck has come across animals that had been shot, beaten, burned, skinned, stabbed and sexually assaulted. What possesses someone to do that sort of work? The obvious reason is not the initial one that people like Merck and Lockwood cite. Yes, they care about animals, but first, they say, they care about humans. Study after study has shown that people who abuse animals are much more likely to later abuse humans. The connection between animal cruelty and child abuse is especially clear-cut. "One out of every five cases of animal abuse typically had a domestic abuse or child abuse case attached to it," said Wilkins, the former Cobb prosecutor. "Whenever we got a case of animal abuse we asked if there were small children in the home. If there were, [the Department of Family and Children's Services] was called in." Children and pets can't defend themselves, so they're easy marks for abusers, the wide majority of whom are males. They often hurt a pet to control their wife or female partner, experts say. A study at a shelter for battered women in Utah found that more than 70 percent of their partners had threatened, hurt or killed a family pet. Serial murderers typically start out as animal abusers, studies have found. From the Boston Strangler to Jeffrey Dahmer and many of the big-time killers in between, early animal abuse was a common thread. The house of dead cats When Merck was summoned to the house in Alpharetta with 179 dead cats, she took note of the investigative team on the scene. There were police investigators, animal control officers, a county prosecutor and police officers to secure the site. "It was just like a regular crime scene," Merck said. "It was like 'CSI' and 'Law & Order' and 'Third Watch' all in one. Everyone who should have been there was there." To Merck, that spoke volumes about how far the movement to protect animals has come. Animal hoarding, as the Alpharetta situation is called, is different from traditional abuse cases. The devastation comes from neglect instead of violence. And whereas animal cruelty is almost always done by males, hoarding is usually done by females. In the Alpharetta case, homeowner Lauri Lockwood, 45, has been charged with aggravated cruelty to animals — a felony punishable by up to five years in prison and $15,000 in fines. Other charges are possible after evidence is presented to the grand jury. Hoarding has become "extremely common," said the Humane Society's Lockwood (no relation to the suspect). "We see 5,000 to 7,000 new cases each year." The worst he's seen had more than 1,000 animals at one residence. Lockwood said he considers animal hoarding a form of mental illness. Merck thinks it's "too complex to just say, 'They're crazy' " In any case, she does not think neglect is less of a crime than violence. "What's more horrific," she said, "someone who shoots a dog or someone who starves a dog over several months?" After she completed her CSI work in Alpharetta, Merck took the 26 surviving cats back to her clinic. All are improving, she said. Meanwhile, Fulton County Animal Services is busy arranging adoptions — screening applicants, accepting letters of recommendation, even visiting prospective homes. "They're making people who want to adopt them jump through hoops because of what these cats have been through," Merck said. "They want to make sure they'll never be traumatized again." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:29:57 -0500, Julie Cook
yodeled: This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html Thank you for posting this. I am always glad to see it when someone somewhere smartens up about cruelty to animals, and understands that it co-exists with, or is the first step towards, abominable cruelty to humans. Theresa Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kreisleriana wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:29:57 -0500, Julie Cook yodeled: This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html Thank you for posting this. I am always glad to see it when someone somewhere smartens up about cruelty to animals, and understands that it co-exists with, or is the first step towards, abominable cruelty to humans. Theresa Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com I am ashamed to say this. No, let this be a lesson to people. My ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for pooping on the floor and he hit him and then flung him onto the cement balcony where he'd constructed sort of an enclosure for him. A few minutes later he was yelling, "Jill! Something's wrong with Sampson!" He made me drive him with the dog to the emergency vet without me even getting my glasses. I'm blind as a bat and there I was driving in the dark unable to see. The man examining him said, "Oh my, was he hit by a car?" My husband said, "Yes!" I was so ****ed, I said, "Oh no, he wasn't! You hit him and threw him down on the pavement because he pooped on the carpet!" My ex was appropriately ashamed. After we got home he made an excuse, left and didn't come back for 48 hours. As far as I'm concerned he should *never* have come back. I got the dog in the property settlement. Jill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-03-14, jmcquown penned:
I am ashamed to say this. No, let this be a lesson to people. My ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for pooping on the floor and he hit him and then flung him onto the cement balcony where he'd constructed sort of an enclosure for him. A few minutes later he was yelling, "Jill! Something's wrong with Sampson!" He made me drive him with the dog to the emergency vet without me even getting my glasses. I'm blind as a bat and there I was driving in the dark unable to see. The man examining him said, "Oh my, was he hit by a car?" My husband said, "Yes!" I was so ****ed, I said, "Oh no, he wasn't! You hit him and threw him down on the pavement because he pooped on the carpet!" My ex was appropriately ashamed. After we got home he made an excuse, left and didn't come back for 48 hours. As far as I'm concerned he should *never* have come back. I got the dog in the property settlement. Jill Poor Sampson! Poor you! Reading this story, I have to wonder, were you afraid your ex would retaliate for telling the truth? I remember one time when my ex got angry at a computer game and punched his keyboard so hard that he broke it (and nearly broke his hand). It upset me so much that I was crying and truly scared, especially when I saw the expression on his face. We didn't last much longer. He never raised a hand to me, but after that experience I never quite trusted him. Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game) myself, and I wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to others' violence when I did the same thing myself. It's not logical or fair. Is breaking an object an acceptable way to vent anger, or is it one step on the way to letting loose on people? I think it's a bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who think it's normal. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
On 2005-03-14, jmcquown penned: I am ashamed to say this. No, let this be a lesson to people. My ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for pooping on the floor and he hit him and then flung him onto the cement balcony where he'd constructed sort of an enclosure for him. A few minutes later he was yelling, "Jill! Something's wrong with Sampson!" He made me drive him with the dog to the emergency vet without me even getting my glasses. I'm blind as a bat and there I was driving in the dark unable to see. The man examining him said, "Oh my, was he hit by a car?" My husband said, "Yes!" I was so ****ed, I said, "Oh no, he wasn't! You hit him and threw him down on the pavement because he pooped on the carpet!" My ex was appropriately ashamed. After we got home he made an excuse, left and didn't come back for 48 hours. As far as I'm concerned he should *never* have come back. I got the dog in the property settlement. Jill Poor Sampson! Poor you! Thanks. The pup was okay but he had contusions and a little internal bleeding. They kept him a couple of days. Sampson lived to be nearly 18 under my loving care Reading this story, I have to wonder, were you afraid your ex would retaliate for telling the truth? I was, but I was so angry he'd hurt a defenseless puppy for doing what not-yet-housebroken puppies do - poop - I didn't care at that point. No way could he hit me in front of the vet tech and he was so ashamed it didn't even occur to him to seek revenge. I remember one time when my ex got angry at a computer game and punched his keyboard so hard that he broke it (and nearly broke his hand). It upset me so much that I was crying and truly scared, especially when I saw the expression on his face. We didn't last much longer. He never raised a hand to me, but after that experience I never quite trusted him. My ex-husband never actually hit me. He was good at slamming things around and yelling. And lying. The night I left him he knocked over a bookcase which prompted the downstairs neighbor to call the cops; she thought he was killing me. The police pulled up just after I'd gathered some of my things and the dog and he'd agreed to drive me to my parents house. I explained to the police we'd had a fight and he was driving me and requested they follow if they could. They could and they did. I think they appreciated the fact that I wasn't making excuses for him... my tear-stained face must have been a dead giveaway. Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game) myself, and I wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to others' violence when I did the same thing myself. It's not logical or fair. Is breaking an object an acceptable way to vent anger, or is it one step on the way to letting loose on people? I think it's a bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who think it's normal. I don't know that it's normal to break objects in order to vent anger. When I worked in a restaurant years ago I'd go into the walk-in cooler, shut the door and yell! (They are pretty much sound-proof.) Then I'd go back and wait on the annoying as heck customer who had tripped my trigger Grab a pillow and yell into it rather than hurt your hand on a hard object. Or hug Oscar until your blood pressure goes down. NOTE: 2 years after the divorce I had my ex-husband imprisoned for stalking and threatening me, harrassing phone calls at work, threatening my co-workers and vandalizing my car. Jill |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Julie Cook wrote: This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html This is fantastic news! It's about time legislators began to take animal abuse and neglect seriously. These poor, defenseless animals deserve as much of a voice as we can give them. And kudos to those lawyers who are working as animal advocates! Gives me hope about the lot of them (just kidding, no offense to any lawyers out there ;-) I am just so happy to see this and I hope this spreads quickly to the rest of the nation. Maybe someday we'll see declawing outlawed as a result? Kerrie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I had to skim most of the article, just too emotional right now. Just want
to say, good for her! I'm glad someone is out there sticking up for the animals and taking animal cruelty seriously. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net "Wake up, and smell the cat food" -TMBG "Julie Cook" wrote in message ... This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html Article copied from AJC.com: Forensics: Veterinarian blazes medical trail Fulton County vet plays crime detective in cases of animal abuse By PAUL KAPLAN The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 03/13/05 The kitten was 8 weeks old, and already it had been to hell and back. There was blood in its lungs, and one side of its head was smashed. The young couple that brought the little white Persian to the veterinarian said it was hurt in a fall from a countertop. No way, Dr. Melinda Merck said to herself. First of all, cats are nimble and usually land on all fours. But even if it had fallen, a 2-pound kitten would not generate enough force to cause such severe injuries. As she examined the cat, Merck ruled out the possibility of a car having hit it because it had no abrasions. As soon as the couple left, she called animal control. An officer went to interview the couple, and the young man finally admitted he'd slammed the kitten into a wall. That was Merck's first experience in medical sleuthing, back in 1990. Fifteen years later, she's a leading authority in the emerging field of animal forensics. Fulton and Cobb counties bring her in regularly to help investigate and treat abused and neglected animals. She got the call last month when 205 cats were found inside a house in Alpharetta. All but 26 were dead. Merck could not have handled a case of that magnitude a decade ago. Back then, she was teaching herself animal forensics because nobody else was doing it. It was like fishing off the end of the world. In those days, even the worst cases of animal abuse could be prosecuted only as a misdemeanor in Georgia and most other states. As a result, many prosecutors were uninterested. Claudine Wilkins, a former Cobb County prosecutor now in private practice, recalls the time she was visiting a judge in his chambers to discuss an animal abuse case when he told her: "If I can't sit on it or eat it, an animal is useless to me." "That's the mentality we're dealing with," said Wilkins, who does legal advocacy work for abused animals. Then, in 2000, the Georgia Legislature passed the state Animal Protection Act, which turned the worst cases of abuse into felonies. That changed things. A nonprofit called Georgia Legal Professionals for Animals was formed, mainly by volunteer lawyers and paralegals willing to help prosecute animal abusers. They were badly needed because felony convictions are harder to win. They require proof of abuse that was "knowingly and maliciously" com- mitted. "To reach that higher standard, you need good science," said Randy Lockwood, vice president of the Humane Society of the United States and an animal forensics expert. "Dr. Merck and a couple of other people are on the cutting edge of trying to move that field along." It's been a slow process, but animal forensics has advanced significantly since Merck got started. She had to learn by hanging out with crime scene investigators (CSIs) at human crime scenes and with coroners during autopsies. With virtually no animal forensics or legal help back then, it was open season on animal abuse. When cases were so horrific that charges were filed, Merck said, "It was just he said/she said." Now, with forensic specialists involved, it's he said/she presents the evidence. One reason animal forensics remains in its infancy is that veterinary schools don't teach it. Merck and Dr. Paige Carmichael, a pathologist at the University of Georgia Veterinary School, have put together a proposal to teach a course as an elective at UGA. It would be the first in the nation. A growth industry What has been growing much faster than animal forensics is animal law. "Eight years ago, when I got out of law school, there weren't any animal lawyers," Wilkins said. "Now they're all over the place." A big reason is that more than 20 law schools have courses in animal law, including Harvard, Lockwood said. Wilkins predicted that animal forensics will have a similar growth spiral when vet schools start teaching the course. What the students will learn is that there are similarities between human and animal forensics. The study of bullet trajectories and stab wound angles are similar in both, for example. And there are major differences. Animals have completely different blood types than humans, and they don't bruise externally like humans do because their skin is built for life in the wild and for fighting. The biggest difference is that there's only one human species compared with countless animal species. As the species change, so do the forensics. That's fine with Merck. "I like challenges," she said. "I like puzzles." She also likes animals, of course, and is not shy about it. The bumper sticker on the back of her Lexus says "I (heart) cats" and her cellphone ring is the theme from "The Pink Panther." Animals, Merck said, "don't give you grief, they return affection, and they listen well." She gives the love right back by helping the authorities make cases against people who intentionally hurt animals. She just might be a dog's best friend. When she was growing up in Lubbock, Texas, Merck would bring home injured cats and birds, "much to my parents' dismay." Now she's a veteran of the animal abuse wars who recalls horrible cases in a detached clinical monotone, as if she were dictating the list of wounds to a tape recorder. But suddenly she'll pause in midsentence and become teary-eyed. She'll turn away reflexively, reach into her purse for a Marlboro Ultra Light, and fire it up. Then she'll turn back and calmly resume the monotone. "We deal with very sad cases, very nasty things done by very violent people," Lockwood said. "Melinda offers a good blend of the heart and the head. She gets emotionally involved in the issues but doesn't let that disable her." Abuse breeds abuse Since she started working in forensics, Merck has come across animals that had been shot, beaten, burned, skinned, stabbed and sexually assaulted. What possesses someone to do that sort of work? The obvious reason is not the initial one that people like Merck and Lockwood cite. Yes, they care about animals, but first, they say, they care about humans. Study after study has shown that people who abuse animals are much more likely to later abuse humans. The connection between animal cruelty and child abuse is especially clear-cut. "One out of every five cases of animal abuse typically had a domestic abuse or child abuse case attached to it," said Wilkins, the former Cobb prosecutor. "Whenever we got a case of animal abuse we asked if there were small children in the home. If there were, [the Department of Family and Children's Services] was called in." Children and pets can't defend themselves, so they're easy marks for abusers, the wide majority of whom are males. They often hurt a pet to control their wife or female partner, experts say. A study at a shelter for battered women in Utah found that more than 70 percent of their partners had threatened, hurt or killed a family pet. Serial murderers typically start out as animal abusers, studies have found. From the Boston Strangler to Jeffrey Dahmer and many of the big-time killers in between, early animal abuse was a common thread. The house of dead cats When Merck was summoned to the house in Alpharetta with 179 dead cats, she took note of the investigative team on the scene. There were police investigators, animal control officers, a county prosecutor and police officers to secure the site. "It was just like a regular crime scene," Merck said. "It was like 'CSI' and 'Law & Order' and 'Third Watch' all in one. Everyone who should have been there was there." To Merck, that spoke volumes about how far the movement to protect animals has come. Animal hoarding, as the Alpharetta situation is called, is different from traditional abuse cases. The devastation comes from neglect instead of violence. And whereas animal cruelty is almost always done by males, hoarding is usually done by females. In the Alpharetta case, homeowner Lauri Lockwood, 45, has been charged with aggravated cruelty to animals — a felony punishable by up to five years in prison and $15,000 in fines. Other charges are possible after evidence is presented to the grand jury. Hoarding has become "extremely common," said the Humane Society's Lockwood (no relation to the suspect). "We see 5,000 to 7,000 new cases each year." The worst he's seen had more than 1,000 animals at one residence. Lockwood said he considers animal hoarding a form of mental illness. Merck thinks it's "too complex to just say, 'They're crazy' " In any case, she does not think neglect is less of a crime than violence. "What's more horrific," she said, "someone who shoots a dog or someone who starves a dog over several months?" After she completed her CSI work in Alpharetta, Merck took the 26 surviving cats back to her clinic. All are improving, she said. Meanwhile, Fulton County Animal Services is busy arranging adoptions — screening applicants, accepting letters of recommendation, even visiting prospective homes. "They're making people who want to adopt them jump through hoops because of what these cats have been through," Merck said. "They want to make sure they'll never be traumatized again." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yes indeed, good for her! I'm glad the guy responsible was induced to admit it. And that Animal Forensics are becoming more respectable in legal circles. (That poor little kitten...=o( I hope it found a better home after it was well.) Melissa KellyH wrote in message ... I had to skim most of the article, just too emotional right now. Just want to say, good for her! I'm glad someone is out there sticking up for the animals and taking animal cruelty seriously. -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net "Wake up, and smell the cat food" -TMBG SNIp |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Years ago my husband was really angry at something, I forget what after all
these years, but he put his fist through the kitchen wall, fortunately it was an inside wall so it was probably plasterboard, or he would have broken his hand, but once when we were first married I was sweeping the hearthwith the little hearth brush and shovel and we were arguing about something I was on my haunches and he poked me in the shoulder knocking me over as I was unbalanced and I let fly with the brush, it hit him on the forehead and brought blood I thinkit floored him cause he just pointed to the blood and said look what you've done to me. It stopped the argument anyway. Jean.P. Monique Y. Mudama wrote in message ... On 2005-03-14, jmcquown penned: I am ashamed to say this. No, let this be a lesson to people. My ex-husband (divorced 21 years ago, thank Bast) got angry at our puppy for pooping on the floor and he hit him and then flung him onto the cement balcony where he'd constructed sort of an enclosure for him. A few minutes later he was yelling, "Jill! Something's wrong with Sampson!" He made me drive him with the dog to the emergency vet without me even getting my glasses. I'm blind as a bat and there I was driving in the dark unable to see. The man examining him said, "Oh my, was he hit by a car?" My husband said, "Yes!" I was so ****ed, I said, "Oh no, he wasn't! You hit him and threw him down on the pavement because he pooped on the carpet!" My ex was appropriately ashamed. After we got home he made an excuse, left and didn't come back for 48 hours. As far as I'm concerned he should *never* have come back. I got the dog in the property settlement. Jill Poor Sampson! Poor you! Reading this story, I have to wonder, were you afraid your ex would retaliate for telling the truth? I remember one time when my ex got angry at a computer game and punched his keyboard so hard that he broke it (and nearly broke his hand). It upset me so much that I was crying and truly scared, especially when I saw the expression on his face. We didn't last much longer. He never raised a hand to me, but after that experience I never quite trusted him. Since then, I've punched a door (also angry at a computer game) myself, and I wonder how I could have such a negative reaction to others' violence when I did the same thing myself. It's not logical or fair. Is breaking an object an acceptable way to vent anger, or is it one step on the way to letting loose on people? I think it's a bad thing, but I've spoken to other people who think it's normal. -- monique, who spoils Oscar unmercifully pictures: http://www.bounceswoosh.org/rpca |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry the page was unavailable I'll have to read the posts to see if I can
get the information that way Jean.P. Kreisleriana wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:29:57 -0500, Julie Cook yodeled: This is an interesting article, that was in ajc.com today, that I thought might interest some of you. You can find the article at: http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/met...305/13vet.html Thank you for posting this. I am always glad to see it when someone somewhere smartens up about cruelty to animals, and understands that it co-exists with, or is the first step towards, abominable cruelty to humans. Theresa Stinky Pictures: http://community.webshots.com/album/125591586JWEFwh My Blog: http://www.humanitas.blogspot.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|