If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"Ann Martin" wrote in message om... I've quote from letter received from the FDA/CVM as to their knowledge that pets ARE used in commercial pet foods According to the official FDA website,Miss-Leading Martin is stating *false* information. "CVM scientists, as part of their investigation, developed a test to detect dog and cat DNA in the protein of the dog food. All samples from the most recent dog food survey (2000) that tested positive for pentobarbital, as well as a subset of samples that tested negative, were examined for the presence of remains derived from dogs or cats. The results demonstrated a complete absence of material that would have been derived from euthanized dogs or cats. The sensitivity of this method is 0.005% on a weight/weight basis; that is, the method can detect a minimum of 5 pounds of rendered remains in 50 tons of finished feed. Presently, it is assumed that the pentobarbital residues are entering pet foods from euthanized, rendered cattle or even horses." http://www.fda.gov/cvm/efoi/DFreport.htm Is it really true that you keep rephrasing a question until you get the answer you want??? I suggest that you get your story straight the next time you post such inaccurate information. Good idea... You should follow your own advice.. but then you wouldn't sell many books... These three also continue to insist that the pentobarbital in pet food poses no danger. So does the FDA/CVM! "Thus, the results of the assessment led CVM to conclude that it is highly unlikely a dog consuming dry dog food will experience any adverse effects from exposures to the low levels of pentobarbital found in CVM's dog food surveys." FDA/CVM Report on the risk from pentobarbital in dog food http://www.fda.gov/cvm/efoi/DFreport.htm They measured ONE liver enzyme More innuenso! You're implying the test wasn't valid because the FDA tested one enzyme. But you *failed* to mention is that the enzyme that was tested is the *most sensitive" enzyme to pentobarbital! "In dogs, the most sensitive biological response to pentobarbital is an increase in the production of cytochrome P450 enzymes, which is why the scientists chose that as the best indicator of biological effect. If a low level of pentobarbital did not cause a dog to produce additional cytochrome P450 enzymes, then scientists could assume that the pentobarbital at that low level had no significant effect on the dog." I don't have the time to spend with people like you ...who you can't bullsh!t and don't fall for your innuendo! I'm *very* happy you posted to this group because now people can see your books are largely based on *your* conclusions, innuendo, conjecture and scare tactics which the real facts *do not* support You're a manipulator of the worst kind! You play and profit on peoples' fear! |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
So does the FDA/CVM!
You are so innocent! I wonder why documents in the FDA are NOT accessible to YOU, an American citizen, the one who they are supposed to protect. It´s all about money Phil. Pharmaceutical and chemical industry will have the FDA approve whatever they want approved. That holds for any such agency in the world, not just the FDA. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
So does the FDA/CVM!
You are so innocent! I wonder why documents in the FDA are NOT accessible to YOU, an American citizen, the one who they are supposed to protect. It´s all about money Phil. Pharmaceutical and chemical industry will have the FDA approve whatever they want approved. That holds for any such agency in the world, not just the FDA. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Liz, don't be paranoid. There is no big conspiracy. If you let yourself be
duped by people like Ann Martin, then you're setting yourself up to be taken advantage of for the rest of your life. Btw, that doesn't explain why the FDA doesn't approve some drugs. Why would pharmaceutical companies spend all the $$ only to have a developing drug not get approved? Beware those black helipcopters spying on you! There is no conspiracy. There´s making money. There´s public manipulation for economic reasons. Look at Monsanto. They had the FDA approve ethoxyquin for pet food. Now most manufacturers are taking it out of their food. The vet board suggested pet food should have no more than 75ppm when the FDA approved as much as 150 ppm. The same Monsanto had the FDA approve genetically modified seeds. NOBODY knows what environmental or health hazards these genetically engineered plants will cause in the long run. Then Bush backs up Monsanto saying that there are too many people starving in the world and this is reason enough to increase agricultural productivity through GEPs. Yeah right. As if Bush was going to go around distributing food to those starving. Growing crops has a cost and nobody is willing to plant for free. Look at vaccines. All the vaccines the FDA has approved. Many of them cause ADD (attention deficit disorder) and autism. The percentage of children with these disorders has risen dramatically over the last few years. I could give you many more examples but I´m sure with some reading you can find out what is going on in the world you live in. And some companies do not have their drugs approved either because they have a ´no bribe´ policy (yes, these companies exist), or they are unwilling to pay what it takes or it´s just a little theater: they ask for review and the FDA approves the product in the second round. I worked for the pharmaceutical industry for ten years and I sure know what it´s all about. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Liz, don't be paranoid. There is no big conspiracy. If you let yourself be
duped by people like Ann Martin, then you're setting yourself up to be taken advantage of for the rest of your life. Btw, that doesn't explain why the FDA doesn't approve some drugs. Why would pharmaceutical companies spend all the $$ only to have a developing drug not get approved? Beware those black helipcopters spying on you! There is no conspiracy. There´s making money. There´s public manipulation for economic reasons. Look at Monsanto. They had the FDA approve ethoxyquin for pet food. Now most manufacturers are taking it out of their food. The vet board suggested pet food should have no more than 75ppm when the FDA approved as much as 150 ppm. The same Monsanto had the FDA approve genetically modified seeds. NOBODY knows what environmental or health hazards these genetically engineered plants will cause in the long run. Then Bush backs up Monsanto saying that there are too many people starving in the world and this is reason enough to increase agricultural productivity through GEPs. Yeah right. As if Bush was going to go around distributing food to those starving. Growing crops has a cost and nobody is willing to plant for free. Look at vaccines. All the vaccines the FDA has approved. Many of them cause ADD (attention deficit disorder) and autism. The percentage of children with these disorders has risen dramatically over the last few years. I could give you many more examples but I´m sure with some reading you can find out what is going on in the world you live in. And some companies do not have their drugs approved either because they have a ´no bribe´ policy (yes, these companies exist), or they are unwilling to pay what it takes or it´s just a little theater: they ask for review and the FDA approves the product in the second round. I worked for the pharmaceutical industry for ten years and I sure know what it´s all about. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
"Liz" wrote in message om... So does the FDA/CVM! You are so innocent! You're so paranoid! Pharmaceutical and chemical industry will have the FDA approve whatever they want approved. Is that why the FDA is constantly refusing to approve drugs and why they pull drugs off the market? I was wondering when you were going to show up.... It looks like Lauren's calling in the reinforcements! LOL! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|