If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"KellyH" wrote in message news:7UN4b.325042$Ho3.47689@sccrnsc03...
Just curious, as I missed a lot of this thread, Ann, are you against the whole, natural pet foods, such as California Natural and Wellness? Both state they use human-grade ingredients. I just started feeding my cats the Wellness canned cat food, and I have to say, it smells much better than most commercial cat food, and I have noticed the litterbox is less stinky. What about the prescription pet foods? What is a pet owner supposed to do if their cat or dog requires a prescription food? Kelly, I think there are some foods, the ones you mentioned, that do contain quality ingredients and I have often told people that if they don't have time to cook for their pets that these would be good choices. With regard to the prescription diets, one of my cats was on one for five years and it did not help at all. On a homemade diet, which he has been on for fourteen years, the problem was resolved. There is an excellent book written by a very knowledgeable veterinarian, Donald Strombeck, "Home Prepared Dog and Cat Diets," which deals with special diets for many health problems that dogs and cats experience. Ann -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net Check out www.snittens.com "Ann Martin" wrote in message om... olitter (PawsForThought) wrote in message ... From: pam (Mary) http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/consumer/petfoodflier.html "The Act does require that pet foods, like human foods, be pure and wholesome, contain no harmful or deleterious substances, and be truthfully labeled." That's about it. Yeah, that's about it. But I see nothing about pet food be regulated at all. You're right, no one regulates the ingredients in these foods. Contact the FDA/CVM and ask them outright if they, or any agencey, inspects or tests the raw materials used in commercial pet foods. One person in this news group stated that the USDA/FSIS regulated pet food. In an e-mail I received from this department they made it very clear ""NO" FSIS does not inspects or oversees any ingredients used in commercial pet food." I believe this same person stated that it was illegal to use euthanized dogs and cats in commercial pet foods. Again I quoted from a letter I received from Christine Richmond of the FDA/CVM who wrote "CVM has not acted to specifically prohibit the rendering of pets. However, that is not to say that the practice of using this material in pet food is condoned by the CVM." First of all, it is not illegal. Second, the FDA/CVM is aware that this is happening but will take no step to prohibit this practice. I also have letters from a number of people associated with the AAFCO, various states across the U.S.. I asked all of them if any testing is undertaken on any of the raw materials used in commercial pet foods. The reply from all was "NO." I have asked the people who over and over again tell us this industry is regulated to provide some proof of this and not one of them has been able to do this. They ramble on about calcium, phosphorus, nutrients in the food, all of which can be sourced from garbage, and then we are told we should be more concerned about kidney disease etc. in pets then basically what we are feeding them. Why on earth do they think the pets are suffering from so many ills. Could it be from the garbage we are feeding them? Sorry that this has been a rather lengthy reply to your statement, Lauren but I think people should find out for themselves how regulated this industry actually is. Ann Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"KellyH" wrote in message news:7UN4b.325042$Ho3.47689@sccrnsc03...
Just curious, as I missed a lot of this thread, Ann, are you against the whole, natural pet foods, such as California Natural and Wellness? Both state they use human-grade ingredients. I just started feeding my cats the Wellness canned cat food, and I have to say, it smells much better than most commercial cat food, and I have noticed the litterbox is less stinky. What about the prescription pet foods? What is a pet owner supposed to do if their cat or dog requires a prescription food? Kelly, I think there are some foods, the ones you mentioned, that do contain quality ingredients and I have often told people that if they don't have time to cook for their pets that these would be good choices. With regard to the prescription diets, one of my cats was on one for five years and it did not help at all. On a homemade diet, which he has been on for fourteen years, the problem was resolved. There is an excellent book written by a very knowledgeable veterinarian, Donald Strombeck, "Home Prepared Dog and Cat Diets," which deals with special diets for many health problems that dogs and cats experience. Ann -- -Kelly kelly at farringtons dot net Check out www.snittens.com "Ann Martin" wrote in message om... olitter (PawsForThought) wrote in message ... From: pam (Mary) http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/consumer/petfoodflier.html "The Act does require that pet foods, like human foods, be pure and wholesome, contain no harmful or deleterious substances, and be truthfully labeled." That's about it. Yeah, that's about it. But I see nothing about pet food be regulated at all. You're right, no one regulates the ingredients in these foods. Contact the FDA/CVM and ask them outright if they, or any agencey, inspects or tests the raw materials used in commercial pet foods. One person in this news group stated that the USDA/FSIS regulated pet food. In an e-mail I received from this department they made it very clear ""NO" FSIS does not inspects or oversees any ingredients used in commercial pet food." I believe this same person stated that it was illegal to use euthanized dogs and cats in commercial pet foods. Again I quoted from a letter I received from Christine Richmond of the FDA/CVM who wrote "CVM has not acted to specifically prohibit the rendering of pets. However, that is not to say that the practice of using this material in pet food is condoned by the CVM." First of all, it is not illegal. Second, the FDA/CVM is aware that this is happening but will take no step to prohibit this practice. I also have letters from a number of people associated with the AAFCO, various states across the U.S.. I asked all of them if any testing is undertaken on any of the raw materials used in commercial pet foods. The reply from all was "NO." I have asked the people who over and over again tell us this industry is regulated to provide some proof of this and not one of them has been able to do this. They ramble on about calcium, phosphorus, nutrients in the food, all of which can be sourced from garbage, and then we are told we should be more concerned about kidney disease etc. in pets then basically what we are feeding them. Why on earth do they think the pets are suffering from so many ills. Could it be from the garbage we are feeding them? Sorry that this has been a rather lengthy reply to your statement, Lauren but I think people should find out for themselves how regulated this industry actually is. Ann Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
E. Kunze wrote
There will be no more shouting as I will not be responding to these people again. I'd very much regret that. Though I'm not quite sure yet as to how far I agree with you, I feel that some provocative voices might be beneficial to all our pets, even if the only effect would be to encourage more people responsible for pets to acquire more knowledge. Eb, I agree, and I have been able to carry on a non-hostile dialogue with a number of people in the news group. Unfortunately, there are a few, some who claim to be professional, that chose to take the position that they are right and with anything a person says which is against their beliefs, they resort to derogitory remarks and name calling. Totally childish. They have asked for documentation, I've provided it. Have they reciprocated when I have asked for their documentation which would dispute my findings ..... no, and this is when, to apparently avoid admitting they are wrong, the totally nasty remarks begin. As we often find ourselves in the David against Goliath role, rather than in a fair discussion between benevolent partners, occasional shouting is certainly well understood, though tough and persuasive argumentation invariably is more successful :-). With some, there is no fair discussion and with those people I don't bother reading their posts and therefore do not respond. Ann Eb |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
E. Kunze wrote
There will be no more shouting as I will not be responding to these people again. I'd very much regret that. Though I'm not quite sure yet as to how far I agree with you, I feel that some provocative voices might be beneficial to all our pets, even if the only effect would be to encourage more people responsible for pets to acquire more knowledge. Eb, I agree, and I have been able to carry on a non-hostile dialogue with a number of people in the news group. Unfortunately, there are a few, some who claim to be professional, that chose to take the position that they are right and with anything a person says which is against their beliefs, they resort to derogitory remarks and name calling. Totally childish. They have asked for documentation, I've provided it. Have they reciprocated when I have asked for their documentation which would dispute my findings ..... no, and this is when, to apparently avoid admitting they are wrong, the totally nasty remarks begin. As we often find ourselves in the David against Goliath role, rather than in a fair discussion between benevolent partners, occasional shouting is certainly well understood, though tough and persuasive argumentation invariably is more successful :-). With some, there is no fair discussion and with those people I don't bother reading their posts and therefore do not respond. Ann Eb |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know about pentobarbital toxiciity but I do know that in the
cats that I've had I think I've had a very bad record and I sure do want to know why. Allergies, megacolon, IBD... something is wrong here. What EXACTLY have you been feeding them all of these years? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know about pentobarbital toxiciity but I do know that in the
cats that I've had I think I've had a very bad record and I sure do want to know why. Allergies, megacolon, IBD... something is wrong here. What EXACTLY have you been feeding them all of these years? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Eb, I agree, and I have been able to carry on a non-hostile dialogue
with a number of people in the news group. Yes, only those that agree w/ you. The rest that don't agree w/ you are hit w/ your venomous verbiage. Do you have a short temper in "real life?" Unfortunately, there are a few, some who claim to be professional, that chose to take the position that they are right and with anything a person says which is against their beliefs, they resort to derogitory remarks and name calling. LOL! This is fabulous. You JUST described what you've done here!! Totally childish. Yep. They have asked for documentation, I've provided it. uh, no you haven't. That's the problem. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Eb, I agree, and I have been able to carry on a non-hostile dialogue
with a number of people in the news group. Yes, only those that agree w/ you. The rest that don't agree w/ you are hit w/ your venomous verbiage. Do you have a short temper in "real life?" Unfortunately, there are a few, some who claim to be professional, that chose to take the position that they are right and with anything a person says which is against their beliefs, they resort to derogitory remarks and name calling. LOL! This is fabulous. You JUST described what you've done here!! Totally childish. Yep. They have asked for documentation, I've provided it. uh, no you haven't. That's the problem. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Ann Martin" wrote in message om... There will be no more shouting as I will not be responding to these people again. That's the only way you can weasel out of answering questions you can't answer and don't want to answer! LOL! Lauren uses the same routine when I ask her to back up one of her scare tactics and rumors.... Now I know where she gets it from... along with most of her other bullsh!t... You're not as slick as you think you are (although you think everyone else is stupid), at least you know when you're outmatched... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|