If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Phil P. wrote: Actually, you were quoting numbers from an outdated list- that's why I corrected you. You said only two Fancy Feast diets contained 0.80% phosphorus or less. I said you were wrong and showed you about 10 diets that 0.81% or less. You insisted the Katkarma list was up to date even though "Revised: 12-Oct-2003" was clearly printed at the bottom of the page. You also said "But Fancy Feast has not been updated probably because it's still the same,"- which of course is not true-- as you found out after reading the *current* Fancy Feast typical analyses on my site and receiving your own copies from Purina. That's about half true, not bad. I did make a mistake on 1/2 the site, the other part was updated to 2005 but did not include Fancy Feast. Bull****. Fancy Feast Diets are incorporated in the general list (with all the other brands). The list was last Revised: 12-Oct-2003. http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/canfood.htm There is no "other part" of the list- other than the dry cat food section- which is also outdated ( Revised: 05-Nov-2003) http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dryfood.htm Actually, I think you got the product lines mixed up-- and probably confused the person at Purina with all the trivial and extraneous babble you usually include. FF Turkey & Giblets Feast contains 0.45% phos. "As Fed" or 2.04% DMB. However, FF Turkey & Giblets Feast in the *Sliced* diet line contains 0.23% phos. "As Fed" which *indeed* translates into 1.04% phosphorus "DMB". So, Purina was probably correct and you simply confused the product lines. This is silly and presumptuous on your part. No, its a rational and prudent explanation for your blunder. Don't get too depressed and defensive over it; many people don't realize Fancy Feast makes different formulations of the same diets. There were not any product lines to mix up. More bull****. Fancy Feast makes *three* lines of the Turkey & Giblets diet: *Filet & Pate* Turkey & Giblets Feast, *Sliced* Turkey & Giblets Feast, and Turkey & Giblets Feast. Based on my experience with Purina, I think you probably transposed the numbers from one version to another or forgot which product line you were referring to because you were babbling incessantly trying to show them how much you know. LOL! |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Phil P. wrote:
Bull****. Fancy Feast Diets are incorporated in the general list (with all the other brands). The list was last Revised: 12-Oct-2003. http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/canfood.htm There is no "other part" of the list- other than the dry cat food section- which is also outdated ( Revised: 05-Nov-2003) http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dryfood.htm http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dry.htm This is the "other part" - try to comprehend. Look at it again, come on, you can read. DRY CAT FOOD DRY MATTER ANALYSIS (Updated 3/28/05) Numbers ordered by Phosphorus content for CRF cats All Original Mfg were contacted, these responded, see Old Dry Food Page More bull****. Fancy Feast makes *three* lines of the Turkey & Giblets diet: *Filet & Pate* Turkey & Giblets Feast, *Sliced* Turkey & Giblets Feast, and Turkey & Giblets Feast. Based on my experience with Purina, I think you probably transposed the numbers from one version to another or forgot which product line you were referring to because you were babbling incessantly trying to show them how much you know. LOL! You don't know because you were not there. They made mistakes. You make mistakes. We all make mistakes. But to assume something as ignorant as what you post above, concerning conversations with manufacturers and their talking heads - is arrogance on your part. In this case your arrogance supercedes your ignorance. Congratulations! I gather your knowledge is limited to textbooks and what hands-on experience you have? You seem completely out of water when it comes to the scientific literature. I'm surprised that you don't know more. If you do, post something about weights and long-term research concerning felines. I'm all ears, dude. Any reference, preferably a longitudinal cohort followed for at least 5 years that is prospective in design. If you don't know how to search Medline, that's okay, I'll do it later and don't worry I won't post anything on a cat newsgroup dealing with health and behavior. I mean, after all, what would the National Library of Medicine have to do with health? Anything. Let's see some real info for a change. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
This is the "other part" - try to comprehend. Look at it again, come
on, you can read. DRY CAT FOOD DRY MATTER ANALYSIS (Updated 3/28/05) Numbers ordered by Phosphorus content for CRF cats All Original Mfg were contacted, these responded, see Old Dry Food Page |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dry.htm
There's the URL that's on the original page for the other part. You probably missed it in your rush to diatribe. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
More bull****. Fancy Feast makes *three* lines of the Turkey & Giblets
diet: *Filet & Pate* Turkey & Giblets Feast, *Sliced* Turkey & Giblets Feast, and Turkey & Giblets Feast. Based on my experience with Purina, I think you probably transposed the numbers from one version to another or forgot which product line you were referring to because you were babbling incessantly trying to show them how much you know. LOL! You're quite wrong here too. There were not any numbers to transpose. So you are just plain wrong. When they told me the numbers over the phone, I pointed out that was logically impossible since the As Fed should be the Dry Matter Basis divided by the percentage which is always 0.22 or 22% for all their Fancy Feast. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Topaz wrote: Honestly, I tried to be gentle, but you really are an idiot, all your theories aside, Try to be accurate. They are not my theories. I appreciate the accolade but it's just not so. A scientist who did try to bring the theory to the public was Roy Walford, a pathologist at UCLA. The original research was presumably out of the vet research centers. Do you have bipolar episodes that render you incapable of comprehension? if only because you get aggressive when you make a mistake instead of just admitting it. We are all wrong at one time or another, "sixpack abs" and "scientific" training notwithstanding. Learn to shut up and move on when I never mentioned any scientific training. I think you and Phil P. are just assuming that because I used logic. Sorry about that. I'll try not to do that in the future. you are wrong. It will make you look less aggressively stupid. Aside from this topic you have had some good things to offer. If you have trouble following an argument, then yes, people will look stupid or idiotic to you. Is that why you change your screen name from time to time? Start over with a clean slate and give those a time to clue in. Interesting. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
foamed in message oups.com... This is the "other part" - try to comprehend. Look at it again, come on, you can read. Um. "Treeline?" If you are going to K00k out like this every time someone pokes you with a stick, there are going to be a lot of people poking you with sticks. It may be wrong but it is highly entertaining watching you foam at the mouth. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
5cats wrote:
wrote: I mean, after all, what would the National Library of Medicine have to do with health? The real question is, what's it got to do with *feline* health? If you decide to use the National Library of Medicine, you would find that feline studies are included. It's much better, as I alluded in that deleted post, to use the original resources than the textbooks. A text is not bad but it's never as thorough or as accurate as the real, original sources. It's more like Cliff Notes. FELINE! Your search request has found 10,561 REFERENCES through Level 1. So there are over 10,000 medical, scientific articles dealing with felines in the National Library of Medicine's data base. I just did a quick search using Feline! which is for truncation. So it would include feline and felines, for example. Since you are interested in the health of cats, you might want to use this resource. It is available to the public as: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed I find this a good starting point. For example, when I heard that canned food was helpful in preventing urinary problems with cats, I searched the data base. And there was an excellent article from Europe which detailed canned food and crystals in the urine. Apparently there was a complete absence of crystals in the urine in cats fed 100% canned diets. That's a good starting point in that particular debate. And those fed 1/2 and 1/2 had some crystals and so on. But it certainly grabs one attention when one reads 100% absence. You don't often see that in any scientific article. As I recall, and it's been quite a few years, they took into consideration storage and other possible contaminations that could occur in the testing. One could add that it's really the definitive source for humans. I can only wish that more doctors would use it. There is probably something just for vets but this is free and not a bad start, a START, not the finish. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... Phil P. wrote: Bull****. Fancy Feast Diets are incorporated in the general list (with all the other brands). The list was last Revised: 12-Oct-2003. http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/canfood.htm There is no "other part" of the list- other than the dry cat food section- which is also outdated ( Revised: 05-Nov-2003) http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dryfood.htm http://webpages.charter.net/katkarma/dry.htm This is the "other part" - try to comprehend. Look at it again, come on, you can read. Yes I saw that list when Noreen first uploaded it 6 months ago. Fancy Feast is not on that list. Look at it again - try to comprehend. The values for Fancy Feast that you posted were from an outdated list that clearly stated: "Revised: 12-Oct-2003" yet you insisted the list was not outdated. Surprising that an pedantic, anal retentive neurotic would miss such an obvious detail. More bull****. Fancy Feast makes *three* lines of the Turkey & Giblets diet: *Filet & Pate* Turkey & Giblets Feast, *Sliced* Turkey & Giblets Feast, and Turkey & Giblets Feast. Based on my experience with Purina, I think you probably transposed the numbers from one version to another or forgot which product line you were referring to because you were babbling incessantly trying to show them how much you know. LOL! You don't know because you were not there. Yeah, but I know how you babble on and on about trivial and extraneous details trying to show off what a 'scientist' you are and that's enough from which to draw a likely conclusion. The person on the phone either forgot what the hell you were actually talking about or she dosed off from boredom while you were babbling incessantly. Your posts could be used as therapy for insomniacs that don't respond to strong drugs. LOL! I gather your knowledge is limited to textbooks and what hands-on experience you have? Yeah, limited to about 45 years of experience working with thousands of stray, feral, shelter and pet cats and dozens of vets, pathologists and labs. And limited to operating a clinic for cats that have special needs and cats that require rehabilitation before they can be adoptable. And, as a matter of fact, I do have a rather extensive veterinary medical library-- more extensive than most general practioners. Where exactly does your "fountain of wisdom" about cats come from? The web! LOL! You clearly have no or very, very little experience or practical knowledge. You seem completely out of water when it comes to the scientific literature. Quite the contrary. My library consists of tens of thousands of dollars in veterinary medical texts and I subscribe to several veterinary medical journals. I just don't babble on about it- I used to-- but I learned that it only confuses people and puts them off-- as you're learning- or hopefully learning. However, I know how to blend 'scientific literature' with practical real life experience-- which you don't. If you read the studies that say cats are asocial and solitary animals, you'd believe them because they're 'scientific literature" regardless of reality! LOL! But fret not, if you stop babbling long enough, I'll educate you some more about real life cats. You've already learned more about feline nutrition from me than you ever knew before. Consider this advice and constructive criticism- and learn from it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
it should recommend lean frames in front of the sick polite square, whilst Gilbert sadly departs them too | Angelo | Cat anecdotes | 0 | September 11th 05 02:10 PM |
lots of gardners fully recommend the shallow house | I. I. Stahl-Nice | Cat anecdotes | 0 | September 11th 05 01:17 PM |
these days, raindrops recommend outside dark deserts, unless they're sour | Vincent Imbruglia | Cat anecdotes | 0 | September 11th 05 01:15 PM |
a lot of hens rigidly recommend the lean morning | Endora | Cat anecdotes | 0 | September 10th 05 01:29 PM |
i was covering to recommend you some of my dull films | Jeremy | Cat anecdotes | 0 | September 10th 05 12:56 PM |