A cat forum. CatBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CatBanter forum » Cat Newsgroups » Cat health & behaviour
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

food...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #44  
Old November 25th 03, 01:21 PM
PawsForThought
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Steve Crane)

(PawsForThought) wrote in message
...

I don't know what's in their product but evidently has the VOHC approval,

for
what it's worth. The problem with these kibble dental diets is the way

cats
chew. Their teeth are meant for ripping and tearing and from my

understanding
cats don't always chew kibble in a beneficial way for a dental diet. Also,

SD
dental is a dry food and it's been proven that canned cat food is much
healthier for cats.


Some caution here. The ONLY thing that has been "proven" is that cat
fed a wet food will excrete more water in the urine, in contrast cats
fed a dry food excrete more water in the feces. The thinking is that
excreting additional water in the urine dilutes the urine and reduces
the risk if FLUTD in cats. Considering that FLUTD affects a much
smaller percentage of cats than does periodontal disease, one needs to
weigh the risks and make an informed decision. All other claims for
wet foods are mere hypothesis and remain unproven.


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember, cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as 45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?

http://www.avma.org/convention/recap/news/tuesday16.asp

http://home.earthlink.net/~jacm2/id1.html


http://www.felinefuture.com/nutrition/bpo_ch4.php

Lauren
________
See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm
  #45  
Old November 25th 03, 01:21 PM
PawsForThought
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Steve Crane)

(PawsForThought) wrote in message
...

I don't know what's in their product but evidently has the VOHC approval,

for
what it's worth. The problem with these kibble dental diets is the way

cats
chew. Their teeth are meant for ripping and tearing and from my

understanding
cats don't always chew kibble in a beneficial way for a dental diet. Also,

SD
dental is a dry food and it's been proven that canned cat food is much
healthier for cats.


Some caution here. The ONLY thing that has been "proven" is that cat
fed a wet food will excrete more water in the urine, in contrast cats
fed a dry food excrete more water in the feces. The thinking is that
excreting additional water in the urine dilutes the urine and reduces
the risk if FLUTD in cats. Considering that FLUTD affects a much
smaller percentage of cats than does periodontal disease, one needs to
weigh the risks and make an informed decision. All other claims for
wet foods are mere hypothesis and remain unproven.


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember, cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as 45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?

http://www.avma.org/convention/recap/news/tuesday16.asp

http://home.earthlink.net/~jacm2/id1.html


http://www.felinefuture.com/nutrition/bpo_ch4.php

Lauren
________
See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm
  #46  
Old November 25th 03, 01:21 PM
PawsForThought
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Steve Crane)

(PawsForThought) wrote in message
...

I don't know what's in their product but evidently has the VOHC approval,

for
what it's worth. The problem with these kibble dental diets is the way

cats
chew. Their teeth are meant for ripping and tearing and from my

understanding
cats don't always chew kibble in a beneficial way for a dental diet. Also,

SD
dental is a dry food and it's been proven that canned cat food is much
healthier for cats.


Some caution here. The ONLY thing that has been "proven" is that cat
fed a wet food will excrete more water in the urine, in contrast cats
fed a dry food excrete more water in the feces. The thinking is that
excreting additional water in the urine dilutes the urine and reduces
the risk if FLUTD in cats. Considering that FLUTD affects a much
smaller percentage of cats than does periodontal disease, one needs to
weigh the risks and make an informed decision. All other claims for
wet foods are mere hypothesis and remain unproven.


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember, cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as 45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?

http://www.avma.org/convention/recap/news/tuesday16.asp

http://home.earthlink.net/~jacm2/id1.html


http://www.felinefuture.com/nutrition/bpo_ch4.php

Lauren
________
See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm
  #47  
Old November 25th 03, 04:13 PM
Mary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
From: (Steve Crane)


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite

a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember,

cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small

amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural

diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as

45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a

cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the

carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of

obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?


Not taking sides in the general debate, I would still like to offer my
experience into the mix. My 20-year-old received nothing but dry food
(SD regular and later for Srs) for a good 16 years. She was a really
easy cat--I just kept the bowl full at all times--and she was never in
any way overweight. She weighed 8-9 pounds her whole life. I think a
lot of this has to do with genetics. (The fat factor, that is, or the
propensity for overeating.)

What I think is very significant is that her daughter, also a
blue-cream tortoiseshell domestic shorthair, and necessarily quite
similar genetically had lost nearly all of her teeth by age 19 while
her mother had all of her teeth at age 20.

The only difference is that the daughter was fed wet food exclusively
and the mother dry.

Seems significant to me.

I still feed my current kitties a mix of wet and dry, and some plain
people meat as treats.


  #48  
Old November 25th 03, 04:13 PM
Mary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
From: (Steve Crane)


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite

a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember,

cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small

amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural

diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as

45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a

cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the

carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of

obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?


Not taking sides in the general debate, I would still like to offer my
experience into the mix. My 20-year-old received nothing but dry food
(SD regular and later for Srs) for a good 16 years. She was a really
easy cat--I just kept the bowl full at all times--and she was never in
any way overweight. She weighed 8-9 pounds her whole life. I think a
lot of this has to do with genetics. (The fat factor, that is, or the
propensity for overeating.)

What I think is very significant is that her daughter, also a
blue-cream tortoiseshell domestic shorthair, and necessarily quite
similar genetically had lost nearly all of her teeth by age 19 while
her mother had all of her teeth at age 20.

The only difference is that the daughter was fed wet food exclusively
and the mother dry.

Seems significant to me.

I still feed my current kitties a mix of wet and dry, and some plain
people meat as treats.


  #49  
Old November 25th 03, 04:13 PM
Mary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
From: (Steve Crane)


That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite

a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember,

cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small

amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural

diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as

45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a

cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the

carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of

obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?


Not taking sides in the general debate, I would still like to offer my
experience into the mix. My 20-year-old received nothing but dry food
(SD regular and later for Srs) for a good 16 years. She was a really
easy cat--I just kept the bowl full at all times--and she was never in
any way overweight. She weighed 8-9 pounds her whole life. I think a
lot of this has to do with genetics. (The fat factor, that is, or the
propensity for overeating.)

What I think is very significant is that her daughter, also a
blue-cream tortoiseshell domestic shorthair, and necessarily quite
similar genetically had lost nearly all of her teeth by age 19 while
her mother had all of her teeth at age 20.

The only difference is that the daughter was fed wet food exclusively
and the mother dry.

Seems significant to me.

I still feed my current kitties a mix of wet and dry, and some plain
people meat as treats.


  #50  
Old November 25th 03, 04:31 PM
PawsForThought
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Mary"

"PawsForThought" wrote in message
...
From:
(Steve Crane)

That may be, but I believe these articles written by vets say quite

a lot about
feeding cats kibble that is diluted with lots of grains. Remember,

cats are
carnivores and aren't meant to eat grain based foods. A small

amount of grains
is fine, but not in the high amounts in kibble. The cat's natural

diet would
consist of about 1 to 2% carbs whereas kibble can contain as much as

45% carbs.
I've never seen it proven where a dry kibble is healthier for a

cat. Since a
cat metabolizes primarily fat and protein for energy, most of the

carbohydrates
in the diet are then stored as body fat. Look at the high number of

obese cats
there are. You can't tell me that's healthy, now can you?


Not taking sides in the general debate, I would still like to offer my
experience into the mix. My 20-year-old received nothing but dry food
(SD regular and later for Srs) for a good 16 years. She was a really
easy cat--I just kept the bowl full at all times--and she was never in
any way overweight. She weighed 8-9 pounds her whole life. I think a
lot of this has to do with genetics. (The fat factor, that is, or the
propensity for overeating.)

What I think is very significant is that her daughter, also a
blue-cream tortoiseshell domestic shorthair, and necessarily quite
similar genetically had lost nearly all of her teeth by age 19 while
her mother had all of her teeth at age 20.

The only difference is that the daughter was fed wet food exclusively
and the mother dry.

Seems significant to me.

I still feed my current kitties a mix of wet and dry, and some plain
people meat as treats.


I'm sure there are lots of cats that do great on dry food. But from reading
these articles, it seems there are quite a few that do become obese, or have
other problems from eating a dry food diet. They had an updated figure that
came out I wish I could remember. It was quite high though. I'll see if I can
find it. Also, as to the dental benefits to dry, it seems it depends a lot on
how the particular cat chews his food. I don't know, I guess it depends on
what a person thinks the trade off is by feeding kibble as the main diet as
opposed to canned. I think what you're doing, by feeding both, sounds good.
With my last cats, I fed them about 75% canned and about 25% dry food.

Lauren
________
See my cats:
http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe
Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html
http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html
Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
feed Nutro? Tamara Cat health & behaviour 90 November 19th 03 12:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CatBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.