If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#821
|
|||
|
|||
|
#822
|
|||
|
|||
|
#823
|
|||
|
|||
|
#825
|
|||
|
|||
From: (GAUBSTER2)
First of all you aren't addressing the fact that she has admitted an anti-Hills agenda and doesn't even try to appear fair. What's up w/ that? I've explained several times that I fed my previous cats Science Die tnot my current cats. I was forced to dig out my deceased cats medical records because you couldn't accept the fact that my cats did poorly on Science Diet food. This was something I did not relish doing, as it brought up painful memories. But still I went through one of the cat's records and I even quoted the vet's notes. You know, you really come off as someone totally unhinged and out of touch with reality. You take such offense when someone posts that their previous cats did poorly on Science Diet. I don't understand why you would take something like that so seriously to heart. You come off as someone with the agenda here, not me. You seem to have a very serious problem, unless off course you, or perhaps a member of your family works for Hill's. I have never seen a typical pet owner defend a pet food with the veracity that you have. It's really bizarre, to say the least. You did the exact same thing in the dog groups. One has to really wonder about you. I have never seen you post in any other threads or have one original thought. Have you considered psycbotherapy? Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#826
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Cathy Friedmann"
"GAUBSTER2" wrote in message ... It's somewhat telling that the females can't or won't see it and the males point out the inconsistencies Whoa - two for two in one post. Another hint: Quit while you're behind. Cathy LOL, and he IS behind. Seems he has nothing useful to say so he resorts to putting women down. Small mind, small words, small..... Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#827
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Cathy Friedmann"
"GAUBSTER2" wrote in message ... It's somewhat telling that the females can't or won't see it and the males point out the inconsistencies Whoa - two for two in one post. Another hint: Quit while you're behind. Cathy LOL, and he IS behind. Seems he has nothing useful to say so he resorts to putting women down. Small mind, small words, small..... Lauren ________ See my cats: http://community.webshots.com/album/56955940rWhxAe Raw Diet Info: http://www.holisticat.com/drjletter.html http://www.geocities.com/rawfeeders/ForCatsOnly.html Declawing Info: http://www.wholecat.com/articles/claws.htm |
#828
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil P." wrote in message
... "GAUBSTER2" wrote in message ... From: "Cathy Friedmann" I missed that one by over 3 years. I'm not sure what you mean by that. Long story... nefarious/"iffy" method by which Phil introduced himself to this ng. Bullsh!t! I was already here for a few months..... Funny how I have no recollection of you, at all, before the PR posts. Perhaps by "already here", you mean reading, not posting?? He supposedly just happened to meet a Vietnam buddy, "Phoenix Rising" here one day - they showed up at the same time - & they jabbbered on & on in a long thread about their old times in Vietnam. People asked them to take it to PEM & they said, "No". PR eventually left (never to return) & Phil stayed. It was just plain weird. Thanks for the update. I don't know how many times I posted that PR finally admitted the meeting was arraigned by a mutual friend.... It boggles the mind that Cathy remembers everything else but that... I do remember that; however, you only admitted to it, much much later, when people nailed you on the whole PR thing. It was all "innocent" when the PR thread/posts were actually going on. (And whether or not PR was actually another real person is still open to debate... after that little stunt, it's difficult to take what you say with anything less than a grain of salt.) If this is of such great significance to her... she must lead a very dismal life... Did you notice how upset Cathy gets when someone agrees with me or even worse, defends me? ROTFL! She's definitely obsessed with showing the world I'm such a "bad boy"... I think there's a bit of pathology involved with her obsession... ROTFL! Hey, getting back to old form - some ROTFLs, instead of miserly little LOLs. Could you imagine going on a date with her! Instead of a goodnight kiss, she'd give you a report card on your behavior! LOL! Well, you'll certainly never have the chance to find out, that's for sure. :-Þ Cathy -- "Staccato signals of constant information..." ("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon |
#829
|
|||
|
|||
"Phil P." wrote in message
... "GAUBSTER2" wrote in message ... From: "Cathy Friedmann" I missed that one by over 3 years. I'm not sure what you mean by that. Long story... nefarious/"iffy" method by which Phil introduced himself to this ng. Bullsh!t! I was already here for a few months..... Funny how I have no recollection of you, at all, before the PR posts. Perhaps by "already here", you mean reading, not posting?? He supposedly just happened to meet a Vietnam buddy, "Phoenix Rising" here one day - they showed up at the same time - & they jabbbered on & on in a long thread about their old times in Vietnam. People asked them to take it to PEM & they said, "No". PR eventually left (never to return) & Phil stayed. It was just plain weird. Thanks for the update. I don't know how many times I posted that PR finally admitted the meeting was arraigned by a mutual friend.... It boggles the mind that Cathy remembers everything else but that... I do remember that; however, you only admitted to it, much much later, when people nailed you on the whole PR thing. It was all "innocent" when the PR thread/posts were actually going on. (And whether or not PR was actually another real person is still open to debate... after that little stunt, it's difficult to take what you say with anything less than a grain of salt.) If this is of such great significance to her... she must lead a very dismal life... Did you notice how upset Cathy gets when someone agrees with me or even worse, defends me? ROTFL! She's definitely obsessed with showing the world I'm such a "bad boy"... I think there's a bit of pathology involved with her obsession... ROTFL! Hey, getting back to old form - some ROTFLs, instead of miserly little LOLs. Could you imagine going on a date with her! Instead of a goodnight kiss, she'd give you a report card on your behavior! LOL! Well, you'll certainly never have the chance to find out, that's for sure. :-Þ Cathy -- "Staccato signals of constant information..." ("The Boy in the Bubble") Paul Simon |
#830
|
|||
|
|||
"Yngver" wrote in message ... "Phil P." wrote: "Yngver" wrote in message ... (GAUBSTER2) wrote: I have read Lauren's posts on this and other boards for a long time. I don't see any reason to suspect her of constantly lying or making things up. Nothing gets past your lightening quick perception, does it! For example: From: "PawsForThought" Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:33 AM Subject: "Science Diet" Hairball Control Sensitivity "However, one of my cats anal glands became very badly impacted and infected from eating Science Diet" From: Darnit7 ) Subject: Cat food and anal gland Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats.health+behav Date: 2001-01-05 18:50:10 PST "But I don't see how wet food would cause your kitty's [anal gland]problems. Seems like this vet wants to push Science Diet." She couldn't see how wet food would cause anal sac problems in the OP's cat.... but she had no doubt that SD "caused" anal sac disease in her cat.... So you assume the SD that "caused" anal sac problems in her cat was wet and not dry? If that's the case, okay, I see your point. But if you don't know whether she meant wet or dry SD, how can you insist it's a lie? ....because she's been vehemently against dry food since day one.... If you were following her posts about foods as close as you say you were, there would be no doubt in your mind either.... You're hardly impartial... ...and you can't see any reason to think she's a liar and conjures up bullsh!t stories....??? I think you should see an ophthalmologist... quick if not sooner! LOL! If she was feeding her cat SD kibble, there's no actual contradiction, is there? You're absolutely not "impartial" as you say you are or you're simply obtuse... Do you know for a fact she meant SD canned? Based on her posting history, absolutely *yes* -- although she can and probably will say no because it suits her agenda... like she usually does... Perhaps you can dig up a post to clarify. Her posting history from day one more than clarifies it... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|